Conduct Committee
The conduct of Lord Ahmed

6th Report of Session 2019-21 - published 17 November 2020 - HL Paper 170

Contents

Report from the Conduct Committee

Introduction

The complaint

The Commissioner’s investigation and findings

Lord Ahmed’s appeal

The Committee’s deliberations

Appeal against the findings

Appeal against the recommended sanction

Annex A: Commissioner’s main report

Executive Summary

Chapter 1: Summary of allegations and investigation

Ms Zaman’s complaint

Lord Ahmed’s response

Chapter 2: Investigation and evidence

Key events

Key evidence

Letter to Commissioner Dick and the reply from DSupt Prins

Mobile phone data retrieved by Ms Zaman

Police interviews

Interviews during this investigation

Structure of this report

Chapter 3: 21 February–2 March 2017

Ms Zaman’s introduction to Lord Ahmed on 21 February 2017

Evidence

Finding

Whether Lord Ahmed was aware from the start that Ms Zaman was vulnerable

Evidence

Analysis

Finding

Dinner at the Sahara Grill and the letters to and from the Metropolitan Police

Evidence

Analysis

Findings

Ms Zaman’s alleged wish not to be identified to the police or to meet them

Evidence

Analysis

Finding

Chapter 4: 2 March–September 2017

Alleged sexual assault after the dinner at the Sahara Grill

Evidence

Analysis

Finding

Lord Ahmed’s communications with the police in 2017

Evidence

Analysis

Finding

Contact between Ms Zaman and Lord Ahmed between 2 March and 14 July 2017 and Lord Ahmed’s behaviour during this time

Evidence

Analysis

Finding

When did Ms Zaman see the reply from the police dated 3 May 2017?

Evidence

Analysis

Finding

When did Ms Zaman go to Lord Ahmed’s house?

Evidence

Analysis

Finding

Why did Ms Zaman go to Lord Ahmed’s house in September 2017?

Evidence

Analysis

Finding

Chapter 5: September–November 2017

How the sexual relationship began

Evidence

Analysis

Finding

Ms Zaman’s allegation that Lord Ahmed spiked her tea

Evidence

Analysis

Finding

The basis of their relationship until it ended in November 2017

Evidence

Analysis

Finding

Chapter 6: November–December 2017

Whether Ms Zaman was passed to X

Evidence

Finding

Deleting messages from Ms Zaman’s phone

Evidence

Analysis

Finding

Chapter 7: Lord Ahmed’s allegations that Ms Zaman’s account cannot be trusted

Allegations made in Lord Ahmed’s written statement of 23 July 2019

Ms Zaman’s doubts about whether Lord Ahmed had written to Commissioner Dick

WhatsApp messages confirming Lord Ahmed was taking up Ms Zaman’s case

Ms Zaman’s alleged claim that Lord Ahmed forced her to have sex with him when she first visited his house

Allegations made in Lord Ahmed’s written statement of 18 November 2019

Invitation to dinner at the Sahara Grill

When Lord Ahmed was out of the country

Ms Zaman’s recollection of the contents of the reply from the police

Ms Zaman having offered money for false statements

Allegations made in correspondence

Ms Zaman’s disagreement with the outcome of the police’s review of her case

Ms Zaman’s text to X

Allegations made in Lord Ahmed’s response to the revised draft factual report, sent to me on 13 March 2020

Ms Zaman lied to and deliberately concealed important information from Lord Ahmed

Ms Zaman’s allegations again Lord Ahmed are malicious

Ms Zaman lied when she said she had discussed the assault on 2 March 2017 with Lord Ahmed

Ms Zaman set up a fake Facebook account

Analysis

Finding

Ms Zaman’s mobile phone evidence

Lord Ahmed’s allegation

Analysis

Finding

Chapter 8: Conclusions

Application of the Code

Parliamentary duties and activities

Behaviour Code provisions and personal honour

Principles of conduct in public life

Application to this case

Was Lord Ahmed carrying out a parliamentary activity in relation to Ms Zaman from February to November 2017?

Allegation: Lord Ahmed put his hand on Ms Zaman’s upper thigh, which was unexpected, uninvited and unwelcome

Allegation: Lord Ahmed failed to progress Ms Zaman’s complaint and lied to her about his actions and intentions

Allegation: Lord Ahmed exploited Ms Zaman even though he knew she was receiving treatment for anxiety and depression

Co-operation with my investigation

Chapter 9: Overview and recommended sanction

Overview

Lord Ahmed’s submission in mitigation

Background and character

Any previous breaches of the Code

The effect of these findings

The length of time that has passed since the incident

The appropriateness of the sanction to the breach

Recommended sanction

Annex B: Lord Ahmed’s main appeal document

Introduction

Summary of grounds of appeal

Ground 1: Procedural Irregularities

Principles of natural justice

The irregularities

Ground 2: The Commissioner’s findings are flawed and not based on evidence

The complaints which were not upheld .

The flawed findings

The Complainant’s vulnerability

The Complainant’s desire not to be identified

Alleged sexual assault outside the Sahara Grill

Receiving the response from the police

Evidence undermining the Complainant’s credibility

Ground 3: New evidence casts doubt on the credibility of the complainant

Ground 4: The recommended sanction

Conclusion

Statement of D

Statement of L

Appendix 1: Complainant’s response to Lord Ahmed’s appeal

Appendix 2: Lord Ahmed’s response to complainant’s response

Appendix 3: Commissioner statement on role of Sam Evans

Appendix 4: Lord Ahmed’s response to Commissioner’s statement on role of Sam Evans

Annex C: Commissioner’s supplementary report

Summary

Chapter 1: Introduction

Matters for consideration

Process

Chronology of events and alleged events described in the evidence

Chapter 2: Claims and allegations in D’s and L’s accounts

The statements of D and L that they had been told in April 2018 that Ms Zaman had a reputation as a liar and had made false allegations against J

Analysis

Summary of evidence and analysis

L’s statement that he had been told in April 2018 that Ms Zaman was estranged from her family

Analysis

Summary of evidence and analysis

D’s statement that Ms Zaman had volunteered to him in April 2018 she had lied in her allegations against Lord Ahmed

D’s account

L’s account

Ps account

Ms Zaman’s account

Analysis

Summary of evidence and analysis

Ms Zaman’s allegation, in her written response to the new material, that D had spoken to her father before the Newsnight broadcast, asking him to discourage her from involvement in it, and that this was probably at Lord Ahmed’s request

Analysis

Summary of evidence and analysis

D’s account that W told him that The Sun was pulling out as it believed the allegations to be false

Analysis

The statement of D that Ms Zaman told him in 2018 that she was seeking to create or use a #MeTooMyLord campaign to increase the impact of her allegations against Lord Ahmed

Analysis

Lord Ahmed, D and L

The relationships between Lord Ahmed, D and L

D’s initial refusal to be interviewed

The circumstances leading to D and L giving statements to Imran Khan & Partners in June 2020

Analysis

Summary of evidence and analysis

Chapter 3: Evidence of other witnesses who dealt with Ms Zaman in 2018 and 2019

Z

Analysis

W

Analysis

G

Analysis

U

Analysis

Chapter 4: Evaluation and consideration of previous findings

Conclusion

Appendix 1: Lord Ahmed’s response to Commissioner’s draft factual supplementary report

Appendix 2: Further submissions from Lord Ahmed on Commissioner’s supplementary report

Appendix 3: Complainant’s response to Commissioner’s supplementary report

Annex D: Transcript of Lord Ahmed’s appeal hearing





© Parliamentary copyright 2020