Submission from Equality2025 (SC-51)
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 It is widely acknowledged, agreed and
documented that disabled and non-disabled people are not equal.
There is a vast amount of evidence that, due to societal barriers,
disabled people are more likely to be unemployed and lower qualified
with poorer health and fewer life chances than our non-disabled
peers.
2. EVIDENCE
2.1 The disproportionately low number of
openly acknowledged disabled people in Parliament both reflects
and perpetuates the inequality between disabled and non-disabled
people. In addition, it:
Perpetuates the myth that disabled people
do not or cannot hold positions of power.
Suggests that disabled people do not
or cannot represent non-disabled people.
Does not provide a representative range
of role models or promote career progression for disabled people
within politics.
Does not enable Parliament to reflect
the depth and breadth of the society that Members are serving,
which cannot lead to rounded debates.
Does not result in disabled people considering
themselves to be adequately represented in Parliament, potentially
causing voter apathy and lack of engagement with the political
system amongst disabled people, which ultimately impacts on democracy.
Raises public expectations in the Members
who are disabled (or are assumed to be) that they will work on
all issues relating to disability and/or disabled people and that
they are "experts" in disability issues.
2.2 There are many reasons why there is
a disproportionately low number of disabled people becoming Members
of Parliament, including:
A disparity between the educational and
social opportunities experienced by disabled and non-disabled
young people which impacts on political aspirations and skills.
A widespread, societal assumption that
disabled people are passive and without self-determining power,
which can result in a lack of self-belief and empowerment.
Negative attitudes towards disabled people
lead to low expectations amongst political party officers and
staff that result in a lack of support for disabled people wanting
to enter and take part in the political process.
Physical barriers throughout the campaigning
process, including political party meetings being held in inaccessible
venues, a lack of BSL interpreters etc.
An inflexible and/or inadequately funded
support system for potential candidates who require personal assistants,
support workers or interpreters (eg the cost of a personal assistants,
BSL interpreters etc. necessary to attend late night debates or
the election count may prohibit a disabled person from attending).
A lack of portability (being able to
move social care funding packages between local authorities) results
in many disabled people being unable to move around the country
without risking losing their support package, therefore limiting
their political future to one geographical area.
The personal financial cost of the journey
towards selection (eg training courses, deposits, etc.)
Consultation fatigue. Many disabled people
have considerable experience of being consulted without seeing
any positive outcome, which does not encourage active engagement
in any political process.
The visible working practices of Members
of Parliament are not flexible enough to take account of a wide
variety of impairments, eg people with fluctuating energy levels,
people who require a support worker to assist in the understanding
of complex language, people who require physical assistance on
a regular basis.
2.3 There are many actions that could be
taken by the Government and/or political parties to address the
current disparities in representation, including
Publish statistics relating to numbers
of self-declared disabled people currently sitting as Members
of Parliament, as is current practice around gender and ethnicity.
Set targets and goals to encourage political
parties to challenge their current practices.
Set up and/or fund training schemes to
support and encourage individuals from under represented groups
to engage in the political process.
Publicise and promote the role of Members
of Parliament and other roles within Government and the political
process to de-myth the assumption that under represented groups
"don't belong".
Improve physical access to Parliament
and particularly the House of Commons.
Initiatives such as Better Governance
for Britain should make explicit reference and have specific regard
for disabled people.
Ensure that the equality duties, both
now and under the Single Equality Act once it becomes law, are
enforced and used to encourage political parties to practice fair
selection and the removal of disabling barriers.
Work with organisations of disabled people
to encourage and support disabled people to become leaders, increasing
skills, confidence and aspirations for a career in politics.
Employ more disabled people at all staff
levels.
Publish open statements of support for
increased representation from leaders across Parliament and at
local and regional level.
|