Submission from Janet Gaymer CBE QC, Commissioner
for Public Appointments (SC-81)
1. SUMMARY
1.1 This statement:
outlines the role of the Commissioner
for Public Appointments;
gives details about diversity in public
appointments within the Commissioner's remit and the Commissioner's
Diversity and Talent Strategy;
provides information on political activity
in public appointments within the Commissioner's remit; and
includes the Commissioner's comments
on particular aspects of the Speaker's Conference Inquiry.
2. THE ROLE
OF THE
COMMISSIONER FOR
PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS
2.1 The Commissioner for Public Appointments
regulates and reports on Ministerial appointments to the boards
of specific public bodies in England and Wales and particular
non-devolved public bodies in Northern Ireland. The Commissioner's
role and bodies within her remit are set out in the Public Appointments
Order in Council 2002 and amending Orders (copies attached).
The bodies fall into the following categories:
Executive Non-Departmental Public Bodies
(NDPBs);
some Public Corporations;
Public Broadcasting Authorities;
certain Utility Regulators;
some Non-Ministerial Departments;
Boards of National Parks; and
Conservation Boards for Areas of Outstanding
Natural Beauty.
The Commissioner does not, therefore, regulate
all public appointments. For example, judicial appointments do
not fall within her remit.
2.2 The Commissioner also has a role to
promote equality of opportunity and diversity in the procedures
for making public appointments within her remit, with the object
of maintaining selection on merit. The role to promote equality
of opportunity was given to the Commissioner in the Public Appointments
Order in Council 2002 and diversity was added to her remit
by the Public Appointments (Amendment No 2) Order in Council 2008.
2.3 The Commissioner's aim is to ensure
that Ministerial appointments within her remit are made on merit
after a fair, open and transparent process.
2.4 The Commissioner is independent of Government
and is appointed by The Queen by Order in Council. She is not
a civil servant.
2.5 The Commissioner is supported by the
Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments (OCPA), an
independent office of the Cabinet Office, staffed by Civil Servants.
2.6 The Commissioner does not make public
appointments herselfthis is for individual Ministers following
processes run by their departments (Health Ministers have delegated
this responsibility to the Appointments Commission). However,
departments are required to follow the Commissioner's mandatory
requirements set out in the Commissioner's Code of Practice for
Ministerial Appointments to Public Bodies. (Public appointees
are office holders rather than employees and public appointments
do not therefore constitute employment.)
2.7 The Commissioner publishes statistics
in her Annual Report[228]
on exemptions from her Code of Practice, political activity of
new appointees, diversity of appointees and re-appointees and
on complaints about the public appointments process. The diversity
data differs from the statistics published by the Cabinet Office
in their annual Public Bodies report in that the information contained
in the Commissioner's Report relates to new appointees and re-appointees
whereas the Cabinet Office figures relate to appointees in post.
In addition, the Cabinet Office data include bodies not within
the Commissioner's remit such as Tribunal NDPBs.
3. DIVERSITY
IN PUBLIC
APPOINTMENTS
3.1 Gender statistics
3.1.1 The following table shows the percentage
of new women appointees and re-appointees to the bodies within
the Commissioner's remit for the past three years.
GENDER
|
Year | Percentage of total appointments and reappointments (women)
|
|
2005-06 | 36.6%
|
2006-07 | 36.2%
|
2007-08 | 32.6%
|
|
3.1.2 The Commissioner noted in her latest Annual Report
that 2007-08 was the third successive year in which the percentage
of female appointees and re-appointees had fallen. In addition,
although more female chairs were appointed to executive and advisory
NDPBs in 2007-08, significantly fewer women were appointed as
chairs of health bodies compared with the previous year.
3.2 Ethnicity statistics
3.2.1 Similarly, the Commissioner commented in her latest
Annual Report that the percentage of ethnic minority candidates
also fell from 9.2% in 2006-07 to 7.7% in 2007-08.
ETHNCITY
|
Year | Percentage of total appointments and reappointments
|
|
2005-06 | 8.6%
|
2006-07 | 9.2%
|
2007-08 | 7.7%
|
|
3.3 Disability statistics
3.3.1 The percentage of appointees and re-appointees
declaring a disability in the past three years was as follows:
DISABILITY
|
Year | Percentage of total appointments and reappointments
|
|
2005-06 | 4.4%
|
2006-07 | 6.1%
|
2007-08 | 4.6%
|
|
3.3.2 As illustrated by the above table, the overall
number of appointees and re-appointees declaring a disability
fell in 2007-08 compared with the previous year when the
figures had reached a peak of 6.1%. It may be worthy of note that
the peak percentage followed an OCPA Short-term Working Group
on Disability initiative in 2004-05 and a subsequent disability
mentoring pilot scheme led by the Cabinet Office. (In 2003-04 3.2%
of appointees/re-appointees declared a disability, this increased
to 4.1% in 2004-05 and again in 2006-07 to 6.1%).
3.3.3 There is anecdotal evidence that candidates and
appointees may be reluctant to declare a disability and/or that
the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 definition used in
the diversity monitoring forms does not encourage individuals
to view themselves as having a disability.
3.4 Age statistics
3.4.1 The following table gives an age breakdown by age
for members and chair appointee and re-appointees combined.
|
| Age
|
Year | 66+
| 56-65 | 46-55
| 36-45 | 35 or under
| Did not declare age
|
|
2005-06 | 333
| 1,257 | 880
| 374 | 63
| N/A |
2006-07 | 494
| 1,671 | 1,083
| 485 | 74
| N/A |
2007-08 | 292
| 1,102 | 774
| 348 | 42
| 63 |
|
3.4.2 This shows that typically most appointees and re-appointees
are aged between 56 and 65.
3.4.3 The Commissioner established a working party to
consider the issue of Age and Public Appointments in November
2006. A seminar on this subject was held in Autumn 2007 and
a guidance document for use by departments was produced.
3.5 Diversity and Talent Strategy
3.5.1 The Commissioner is keen to improve the participation
of diverse groups in public bodies within her remit. With this
in mind, she is working on a new two year Diversity and Talent
Strategy. As part of her Strategy, the Commissioner will be examining
(among other issues) the barriers to the participation in public
appointments for people who fall within the following diversity
strands:
religious belief and non-religious belief; and
social exclusion (eg class, region etc).
3.5.2 The Commissioner plans to develop practical tools
and sustainable programmes for departments to help them attract
more diverse candidates, together with improved communication
links (such as electronic links on her website to diverse organisations
and examples of departments' best practice initiatives).
4. POLITICAL ACTIVITY
AND PUBLIC
APPOINTMENTS
4.1 On the recommendation of the Committee on Standards
in Public Life all applicants for public appointment are asked
to complete a standard political activity monitoring form. The
form (which is not made available to the selection panel) only
requests information that is already in the public domain; it
does not ask for personal or private information such as membership
of political parties or voting preferences.
4.2 The form asks candidates to declare any of the following
political activities that they have undertaken in the past five
years:
obtained office as a Local Councillor, MP, MEP etc;
stood as a candidate for Local Councillor, MP, MEP
etc;
spoken on behalf of a party or candidate;
acted as a political agent;
held office such as Chair, Treasurer or Secretary
of a local branch of a party;
canvassed on behalf of a party or helped at local
elections;
undertaken any other political activity the candidate
considers relevant; or
made a recordable donation to a political party.
4.3 Neither activity nor affiliation is a criterion for
appointment except, in rare instances, where statute dictates
specific party political representation (eg for the Committee
on Standards in Public Life).
4.4 The table below gives information on the percentage
of total appointees declaring political activity for the last
seven years.
POLITICAL ACTIVITY
|
| Conservative %
| Labour % | Liberal Democrat %
| Other %* | Total %
|
|
2001-02 | 2.7
| 14.3 | 2.5
| 1.3 | 20.7
|
2002-03 | 3.2
| 11.7 | 2.1
| 1.6 | 18.6
|
2003-04 | 2.9
| 9.2 | 1.8
| 1.3 | 15.2
|
2004-05 | 2.5
| 8.9 | 1.5
| 1.5 | 14.4
|
2005-06 | 2.1
| 8.3 | 1.6
| 1.3 | 13.3
|
2006-07 | 2.5
| 10.2 | 2
| 1.1 | 15.8
|
2007-08 | 2.2
| 5.7 | 1.3
| 1.1 | 10.4
|
|
* Includes Plaid Cymru
|
4.5 As illustrated by the table above, the proportion
of appointees declaring political activity in 2007-08 fell
considerably to 10.4%a big decrease compared with 2001-02 when
it stood at 20.7%. Across the major parties, but particularly
the Labour Party, declaration fell in 2007-08 compared with
previous years.
4.6 In 2007-08 of 2,621 appointees and re-appointees
in total, 272 declared political activity. The table below
gives a breakdown of these:
DECLARED POLITICAL ACTIVITY OF APPOINTEES IN 2007-08
|
Party | Number declaring political activity
| Percentage decrease from 2006-07
|
|
Labour Party | 150
| 4.5% |
Conservative Party | 59
| 0.3% |
Liberal Democrats | 35
| 0.7% |
Other parties | 28
| 0% |
|
5. SPECIFIC QUESTIONS
RAISED BY
THE SPEAKERS'
CONFERENCE
5.1 The Commissioner's non-political role and the current
lack of available evidence means that the Commissioner is regrettably
unable to comment on many of the specific areas of interest highlighted
in the announcement of the Speaker's Conference inquiry. However,
she offers the following comments:
in her view, diverse public body boards lead to better
decision making and improved customer service;
there are many and varied reasons why diverse individuals
may not apply for public appointments. These include insufficient
role models, and the attractiveness of public appointments and
lack of both the understanding of the opportunities for appointment
available and the workings of public bodies; and
there is some evidence that once women apply for public
appointments, they are proportionally more successful than their
male counterparts. Accordingly there is a need to do more to encourage
suitable women to apply for public appointments.
Mrs Janet Gaymer CBE QC
Commissioner for Public Appointments
228
The Commissioner for Public Appointments' Annual Report 2007-08,
available from:
www.publicappointmentscommissioner.org Back
|