Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Written Evidence


Memorandum by Bedfordshire Councils Planning Consortium (RG 96)

  The Bedfordshire Councils Planning Consortium who are opposed to regional government contacted the following councils with regards to the regional government inquiry. Their views are listed below:

LIDLINGTON PARISH COUNCIL

  My Council considered this statement at its meeting last evening and agreed to support the Bedfordshire Council's Planning Consortium. My Council feels that regional government is just another tier to contend with and should not have control over local planning issues. These are for local councils—parishes, district and in some cases, counties—not for other levels.

Colin West, Clerk

SUNDON PARISH COUNCIL

  We are totally opposed to this policy for the following reasons:

  Local planning authorities must make the decisions as to where housing or other development is to take place following consultation with the local people by whom they were elected. The decisions must not be made by unelected bodies.

  A typical example is the provision of a North Luton by pass where representation from local parish councils is excluded and decisions made by large town councils that do not represent those most affected.

  The situation gets worse and more alarming when one considers the East of England regional plan and little input from local people. The Government's stated policy of devolving power to local people and parish councils does not appear to be a reality.

BROGBOROUGH PARISH COUNCIL

  I am writing to confirm that Brogborough Parish Council supports the Bedfordshire Planning Consortium in opposing an unelected regional government.

L C Lyman (Mrs), Clerk

HULCOTE AND SALFORD PARISH COUNCIL

  With reference to ODPM Regional Government, the Hulcote and Salford Parish Council oppose an unelected regional government but if they were elected, we would reconsider.

L C Lyman (Mrs), Clerk

CLOPHILL PARISH COUNCIL

  I am writing to confirm that Clophill Parish Council supports the Bedfordshire Planning Consortium in opposing an unelected regional government.

L C Lyman (Mrs), Clerk

MARSTON MORETEYNE PARISH COUNCIL

  I write to confirm that Marston Parish Council supports the Bedfordshire Planning Consortium in saying no to Regional Government.

Mrs H Trustam, Parish Clerk

WOOTTON PARISH COUNCIL

  On behalf of Wootton Parish Council I am writing to give support to the view that we should say no to regional government. We believe that:

    (a)  Unelected bodies should not run our planning systems etc.

    (b)  We need local people to take care of our villages, town centres, etc.

    (c)  We already have too many tiers of government (ie parish, district and county).

Bob Wallace, Chairman

4CRANFIELD

  We object to the proposals to form regional government with unelected bodies. Elected bodies are answerable to the people that they represent who can choose to support them with a free vote; an unelected regional assembly would be devoid of such accountability.

ALICE CRAMPIN, BEDFORDSHIRE CPRE

  I agree strongly to saying no to unelected bodies running our planning systems etc, although the elected often seem to need regulating these days!

  I do not support regional government even if it were elected. I do support the traditional counties as I think they are still meaningful in people's minds and could be more so—whatever Prescott says.

  I think the West Lothian question needs seriously addressing, however.

ALSO IN SUPPORT OF BEDFORDSHIRE COUNCIL'S PLANNING CONSORTIUMTO SAY NO TO REGIONAL GOVERNMENT

  Chalgrave Parish Council.

  Harlington Parish Council.

  Moulsoe Parish Council.

  Woburn Sands District Society.

  Simon Denchfield, Independent Biggleswade Resident.

CRANFIELD PARISH COUNCIL

  After discussions relating to the regional government inquiry members expressed views as follows:

  Six members rejected regional government.

  Although they did not want to dismiss regional government out of hand, five members said that the question would only be comprehensible with more information.

  One member abstained.

Rosie Davey-Hunt, Clerk of the Council

KEMPSTON TOWN COUNCIL

  The future of regional government was duly discussed by Kempston Town Council at the meeting held on 14 March 2006.

   It was agreed that Kempston Town Council would emphatically not support the abolition of regional government.

  The Regional Planning Panel has delivered considerable benefits to the area, including the Western Bypass and the dualling of the A421. Also, the Growth Area Funding (GAF2) is £12.5 million for Bedford Borough with an additional £2.1 million for the rest of Bedfordshire.

  As you are aware, the current Regional Planning Panel replaced the original Regional Planning Council. All representatives on the Regional Planning Panel are elected either as councillors for their own Authorities, or are representing the voluntary sector as elected by the members of those organisations.

  Can you please ensure that when presenting the view of all the local communities, the above views of Kempston Town Council, representing the people of Kempston, are also expressed clearly.

Lynda Smith, Town Clerk





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 March 2007