Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Written Evidence


Memorandum by the Commission on London Governance (RG 97)

  The Commission on London Governance is a cross party advisory body established by lead members from the London boroughs and the London Assembly. Its great strength is that it is made up active politicians involved in local service provision. The Commission's began work in early 2004, before the announcement of the ODPM's review into the powers of the GLA and before the extension of Sir Michael Lyons's terms of reference.

  The Commission was tasked with reviewing London's governance arrangements from the perspective of public service delivery. We issued and distributed a consultation paper, received written evidence, held structured meetings with resident associations and held oral evidence session with politicians, think tanks and professionals with expertise in the relevant fields.

  The overwhelming message we received is that Londoners find the present governance arrangements confusing and overly complicated and that this lack of transparency hinders effective engagement with serviced providers. There is a lack of understanding of who provides what service and how those services are funded. There is a widespread desire for service providers to be more accountable to local residents; making themselves available to answer questions and to explain changes to services.

  Our proposals set out in our final report "A New settlement for London" have the agreement of all parties on the Commission. The aim is to provide a package of measures that both streamline and increase the accountability of service provision in London. As part of that package we have sought to deepen the process of devolution by dramatically scaling back the role of the Government Office for London and expanding the powers of the Mayor where there is a clear strategic need, subject to enhanced checks and balance from the Assembly.

  The Commission also looked at ways of enhancing the role of local councils by for example, expanding its commissioning role and re-nationalising the business rate to support local quality of life improvements. We also explored ways in which local authorities could come together to more effectively procure and commission services together and provide peer review and performance improvement through a distinctive regional vehicle.

  At the very heart of our work is further consideration of the vital role of the local councillor. We believe that enhancing the role of the councillor through having a statutory right to be consulted by all service providers in their ward will increase the visibility of the councillor in the locality, strengthen the ability of the councillor to broker local solutions, so making them the public face of local service delivery.

  Taken together we believe that this package of measures can make a real difference to increase the accountability of service providers and public engagement in London.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 14 March 2007