Complaints
4.17 During the period covered by this report I received
two complaints relating to the Register of Members' Secretaries
and Research Assistants and one relating to the Register of All-Party
Groups.
4.18 Of the former two complaints, one concerned
the alleged behaviour towards a member of the public of a person
employed by a Member of the House. Such complaints are, initially
at least, a matter for the complainant to raise with the employing
Member, and I so advised the member of the public concerned.
4.19 The second complaint alleged that two people
employed as special advisers to a Minister had failed to record
the fact that they were special advisers in the Register. One
of the two people concerned had worked for the Member long before
he had become a Minister; had held a Parliamentary pass throughout
that period; and continued to do some work for him in a purely
parliamentary capacity. The other had simply acquired a Parliamentary
pass (rather than a civil service pass giving access to the Parliamentary
estate) by analogy with the first. It was evident that there had
been no deliberate attempt to mislead, not least because one other
person employed in the same office who also held a Parliamentary
pass had registered his position as an adviser. I ruled that:
a) where a person employed as a special adviser
held a Parliamentary pass sponsored by a Member, their position
as a special adviser should be recorded in the Register as a form
of employment likely to be advantaged by the possession of a pass.
The entries of the two people concerned in the case were adjusted
accordingly.
b) where a person employed as a special adviser
did not also undertake work of a Parliamentary character which
made necessary the possession of a Parliamentary pass, it was
more appropriate that they should be issued with a civil service
pass sponsored by their Department rather than a Parliamentary
pass sponsored by the Member.
Steps were taken to advise all concerned how to proceed
for the future and the complainant was informed accordingly.
4.20 In June 2006 I received a complaint that one
All-Party Group with a focus on a particular country was in breach
of the House's rules in that there had been irregularities in
the conduct of its AGM and that, following the AGM - at which
a change in the officers of the Group had occurred - it had insufficient
qualifying Members to continue on the Approved List. I did not
uphold the complaint in relation to the AGM but did uphold that
relating to the number of qualifying Members and the Group was
consequently removed from the Approved List. Following the Group's
AGM in 2007, it proved that it possessed sufficient qualifying
Members to meet the House's requirements, and the Group has now
been reinstated on the Approved List.
Wider
Matters
4.21 I have already mentioned in Section 1 the report
published by the Committee on Standards and Privileges in May
2006, following a complaint by the Editor of the Times, and the
subsequent consultation process about my recommendations for strengthening
the regulation of All-Party Groups.[40]
This is likely to result in proposals being put before the House
shortly.
4.22 While complaints relating to the 'other' Registers
continue to be rare in comparison with complaints relating to
failures by Members to comply with the registration requirements
laid down for them, they have in the past five years become a
reality. In practice they have been handled in a similar way to
complaints against Members. The Committee's Ninth Report of Session
2005-06 represented the first case of a formal report to the House
exclusively relating to a complaint concerning a Register other
than the Register of Members' Interests.
4.23 It is important that there should be no doubt
about the procedural authority for what has now become established
as settled practice. At present Standing Order No. 150(2)(e) does
not make explicit that the Commissioner's duties include the investigation
of complaints relating to the 'other' Registers. I hope that,
when the House considers recommendations arising from the Committee's
Ninth Report, it will take the opportunity to put the matter beyond
doubt by bringing the wording of the Standing Order into line
with current practice.
33 Select Committee on Members' Interests, First Report,
Session 1984-85, HC 261 Back
34
Over £300 during the period of this report Back
35
Over £600 during the period of this report Back
36
If a group on the Approved List allows voting rights to people
who are not Members of either the Commons or the Lords, it is
known as an Associate Parliamentary Group. Otherwise it is known
as an All-Party Parliamentary Group. Back
37
Appended to the Ninth Report of the Committee of Session 2005-06,
HC 1145 Back
38
Ibid Back
39
They can be consulted at http://pubs1.tso.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmregmem.htm.
Requests to consult a hard copy of the registers should be made
to the main Committee Office at the House of Commons by calling
020 7219 4300 Back
40
See paragraphs 1.11-1.12 above and the Committee's Ninth Report
of Session 2005-06, HC 1145 Back