Select Committee on Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards Report


5  Looking Outwards

Monitoring Public Attitudes

5.1 In September 2006 the Committee on Standards in Public Life published the results of the second of its surveys of public attitudes in the UK towards standards of conduct in public life.[41] While few of the public say they think "all" or "most" MPs take bribes - just 6% - the 2006 survey found a drop in the percentage willing confidently to rule out the possibility of such behaviour (63% said that such abuse is rare, compared with 80% in the first survey in 2003-04). It may be that this response was affected not by any misconduct in the strictly Parliamentary sphere but by controversy surrounding party political funding, including the 'cash for peerages' affair.

5.2 However, even with this apparent dip in one aspect of public confidence, the majority of people in Great Britain tend to see the overall conduct of public office-holders in moderately positive terms. And it is noteworthy that whilst only 29% of those surveyed said they would trust MPs in general to tell the truth, 48% said they would trust their local MP to do so. It appears that (not surprisingly) we tend to trust the individual Parliamentarian we know more than we do the class of Parliamentarians in general.

5.3 It is clear from the survey that public concerns about MPs' conduct focus more on such behavioural qualities as telling the truth, explaining the reasons for actions and decisions, and owning up to mistakes, than they do on worries about bribery or corruption. As the then Chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life noted when the survey was published, these traits of behaviour are more about "the way the business of government and politics is conducted than about financial 'sleaze'. … These are matters that cannot easily be rectified through codes and rules alone."[42]

5.4 The survey offered some encouragement to those whose task it is to regulate standards of conduct among those in public life in its finding that there had been some increase in public confidence that the authorities in the UK are committed to improving standards in public life (up 5% to 58%) and that the authorities will generally uncover wrongdoing by people in public life (up 3% to 44%). It also confirmed the public's view of the important role played by the media in helping to root out wrongdoing.

5.5 The survey thus offered challenges and some encouragement. It is the Committee's intention to repeat the survey at regular intervals, so that over a period of time it could become an important means of bench-marking shifts in opinion in this area.

Explaining Our Approach

5.6 As part of the open approach I have sought to take to explaining how the standards arrangements in the House of Commons work, my colleague the Registrar of Members' Interests and I are always willing to talk to groups or conferences and to receive overseas and other visitors who want to know about our work. In the twelve months ending in March 2007, we met for this purpose visitors from Australia, Eire, France, Georgia, Ghana, Iraq, Israel, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM), Mexico, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea and New Zealand. The Registrar participated in a conference in Budapest in December 2006 under the auspices of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, and one for new Members of Parliament in Zambia in January 2007. I was one of a three-person delegation to Bulgaria in October 2006 arranged jointly by the British Embassy in Sofia and the British Association for Central and Eastern Europe (BACEE).

Working with Others

5.7 As will be evident from some of the earlier pages of this report, the Registrar and I also maintain close links with colleagues in other UK standards-related bodies, including the Committee on Standards in Public Life, the Electoral Commission and the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments. In October 2006, the Registrar attended the conference for local government standards committees organised in Birmingham under the auspices of the Standards Board for England. We also value highly our relations with those concerned with standards matters in the Scottish Parliament and the Northern Ireland and Welsh Assemblies, and were pleased to be invited in April 2007 to attend one of the occasional meetings with representatives of these bodies, this one held in Cardiff.

5.8 Over my years as Commissioner, I have also come to value greatly the informal relationships I have built up with those occupying similar regulatory roles in the UK public sector. These roles are potentially isolated and the opportunities for mutual learning and encouragement such relationships provide are therefore particularly welcome. I thank all those who, through such relationships, have provided me with their help and encouragement.


41   Survey of Public Attitudes towards Conduct in Public Life 2006, prepared for the Committee on Standards in Public Life by the Ipsos Mori Social Research Institute Back

42   Press Notice issued by the Committee on 15 September 2006 to accompany the report Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 25 October 2007