Select Committee on Defence Third Report



Conclusions and recommendations

1.  Military operations are by their nature unpredictable and it would be understandable if estimates made at the beginning of the financial year required revision. But the MoD will undoubtedly have made internal planning assumptions about the costs of the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and we believe these should be shared with Parliament. (Paragraph 7)

2.  While we commend the MoD for bringing forward the presentation of estimates on the cost of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan to the Winter Supplementary Estimates, we still consider that there ought to be provision for the cost of commenced operations in the Main Estimates. We repeat our earlier recommendation that the MoD consider this. We expect this change to be made unless a more compelling argument can be offered for not doing so. (Paragraph 8)

3.  We repeat our earlier recommendation that provision for operations in the Balkans should in future be set out in the MoD's Main Estimate, and hope that this will be done in the Main Estimates 2007-08. (Paragraph 11)

4.  It seems likely that the actual additional costs of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2006-07 will exceed the amounts requested in the Winter Supplementary Estimate. (Paragraph 21)

5.  We commend the MoD for including considerably more detail on the cost of operations in the Annual Report and Accounts 2005-06, and recommend that it continue this practice in future. (Paragraph 25)

6.  The outturn for 2005-06 was significantly less than the final voted provision: the MoD over-estimated the cost of operations by £165 million (12%)… Where there is significant variation in the cost of operations between voted provision and outturn in future, we shall expect the Annual Report and Accounts to contain some explanation of it, just as there is for significant variations against budgets in other parts of the Defence Estimate. However, we fully accept that, if the MoD agrees to publish estimates of the additional costs of commenced operations at the beginning of the financial year, as we recommend, the scope for error in those estimates might be increased. We accept that in following this approach the MoD might subsequently need to seek additional funds to correct its initial estimates, by seeking a Supplementary Estimate later in the year. (Paragraph 26)

7.  We welcome the MoD's proposal of financial incentives to aid retention in the Royal Marines. We shall be monitoring the retention figures closely. (Paragraph 30)

8.  While we continue to have some concerns about the manner in which the MoD seeks parliamentary approval for the costs of operations, we recommend that the House of Commons approve the request for resources set out in the MoD's Winter Supplementary Estimate. (Paragraph 31)



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 7 December 2006