Select Committee on Public Accounts Seventh Report


2  Accessibility of information for a diverse range of customers

11. For leaflets to be of value, it is essential that the information they contain can be understood by customers with a wide range of levels of education. However, in the absence of simple design measures such as contents pages and clear layouts, information in the Department's leaflets is often difficult for readers to use. In addition, all 13 of the commonly available leaflets tested by the National Audit Office required a reading age higher than the national average and eight required a reading age equivalent to, or higher than, a 16 year old partly because the Department needs to use words such as 'disability' or 'incapacity'.[27] The Department accepted that explaining difficult information in easy terms was a considerable challenge. To improve readability, it is now seeking 'Crystal Mark' status from the Plain English Campaign for all its leaflets. At present, 81 out of the current 178 leaflets (46%) have a Crystal Mark.[28]

12. The Department has issued design standards for external communications, but in the past did not monitor whether they had been adhered to consistently. As a result, the National Audit Office found cases of leaflets which, for example, lacked contents pages and with misleading titles. Nor were leaflets routinely tested with customers before launch.

13. Instead, the Department relied on feedback forms, but these might not capture the views of customers with low literacy levels or who had had problems obtaining the leaflets in the first place.[29] In future it will test all leaflets on a sample of customers before they are issued. More of the Department's recent leaflets contain elements of best practice in design and all leaflets of 12 or more pages must now have a contents page. The new Head of Customer Information Products is responsible for ensuring that these standards are adhered to across the Department.[30]

14. Making information accessible is not helped by the way in which services and initiatives are named. The customers who tested leaflets for the National Audit Office were sometimes misled by their names. There are 14 ways of describing a payment, and individual products can be confusing. For example, many pensioners were confused by the term 'Minimum Income Guarantee' whilst its replacement, the 'Pension Credit' is not a credit in the way that is commonly understood by the word.[31]

15. The Department intends to change its approach to leaflets, moving from product-based material (for example, about specific benefits such as Jobseeker's Allowance) to producing information focusing on 'life events' (such as bereavement or looking for work).[32] This new approach should mean fewer leaflets, and will be accompanied by better signposting to other sources of information, including the internet and personal advisors. It is not yet clear whether the Department will extend this approach to all customers, but the new Jobcentre Plus leaflets are structured in this way for customers of working age. The Department is also trying to move from a position where every new initiative requires a leaflet to one where decisions about leaflets are part of a wider assessment of what information the Department needs to communicate to citizens and how best to do it. [33]

16. People with certain disabilities have particular problems accessing information. For example, at 22% of the 100 sites visited by the National Audit Office it would have been difficult for customers in a wheelchair to access leaflets easily. Customers can order Braille, large print and audio versions of leaflets, but the Department recognises that it will often need to provide other forms of help and support.[34]

17. Information in languages other than English is also not always available in Departmental offices. Only 30% of offices visited had leaflets on display in languages other than English. Leaflets are routinely translated into 11 different languages, with three in audio versions only which are considered most helpful to the relevant communities.[35] The Department assesses the need for translations on the basis of the numbers requested and does not provide routine translations for immigrants from the European Union accession countries, most of whom are assumed to have a good command of English. The Department is able to translate leaflets on demand, and local offices have access to translator services, but customers need to know this service exists in order to use it. In addition, translated versions will reproduce the weaknesses of English-language leaflets.[36] Given that the Department is unable to determine how many of its customers are immigrants, there is a risk that the needs of these groups are not being adequately met.


27   C&AG's Report, paras 2.23 to 2.30  Back

28   Q 6-7  Back

29   C&AG's Report, paras 2.26, 2.34-35; Q13 Back

30   Qq 8-9, 13, 103 Back

31   C&AG's Report, para 2.24; Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, Dealing with the complexity of the benefits system, HC (2005-06) 592; Committee of Public Accounts, Twelfth Report of Session 2002-03, Tackling pensioner poverty: Encouraging take-up of entitlements, HC 565. Back

32   Qq 64, 65 Back

33   C&AG's Report, Box 8 Back

34   Qq 57-58 Back

35   C&AG's Report, para 2.31; Qq 16-23, 97. The languages are Arabic, Bengali, Chinese, French, Gujarati, Polish, Punjabi, Somali, Sylheti, Tamil and Urdu. Back

36   Qq 16-22, 94-96 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 23 January 2007