1 Benefit take-up rates and the reasons
for unclaimed entitlement
1. Over the last decade the percentage of pensioners
living in households below 60% of median income (the level used
by bodies such as the Social Exclusion Unit and the OECD to indicate
relative poverty) has fallen from 27% to 17%. There are however
1.8 million pensioners still living below this level of income
and this number would be significantly lower if more pensioners
claimed the main benefits to which they are entitled. In 2003,
our predecessor Committee reported on the government's efforts
to tackle pensioner poverty by encouraging take-up of entitlements.
Since then, the position continues to be mixed.[5]
Take-up of the basic State Pension is nearly 100%, but for Council
Tax Benefit the figure is less than 60% and has decreased in recent
years. Pension Credit has been introduced to raise pensioners'
minimum income and is claimed by 61 to 69% of those eligible,
leaving between £1.5 billion and £2 billion of unclaimed
benefit (21 to 28% of the total entitlement).[6]
2. Pension Credit is now paid to around 2.7 million
households, around a million more than its predecessor, the Minimum
Income Guarantee. The Department was committed to a Public Service
Agreement target to pay Pension Credit to 3 million households
by the end of February 2006, rising to 3.2 million households
by 2008. After an initial rapid rise, growth in the number of
claimants has reached a plateau at around 2.7 million, although
there are small monthly increases (Figure 1 below). The
Department believes that it will eventually reach the 3.2 million
target, and it has already met its target of paying the Guarantee
Creditthe element of Pension Credit aimed at pensioners
with the lowest incomesto 2.1 million households by 2006.[7]
In retrospect, the Department believes that the 2006 PSA target
was unrealistic, although it was based on the best information
available at the time it was set.[8]
Figure 1: Progress towards the Pension Credit target
Source: Department for Work and Pensions, Work
and Pensions Longitudinal Study
Note:
August 2006 figure is an early estimate.
3. The PSA target focused the Department's attention
on raising take-up of Pension Credit. The target did not, however,
cover other benefits, receipt of which is as important for reducing
poverty.[9] The Department
is currently considering a more general target relating to pensioner
poverty and benefits for pensioners in the context of the 2007
Comprehensive Spending Review. It published baseline indicators
of the independence and well-being of older people, including
material well-being, in October 2006.[10]
4. The Pension Service believes there is a significant
group of people who are entitled to Pension Credit but are not
taking it up. The Pension Service's Local Service staff see about
one million such pensioners a year. Where they do not wish to
pursue a claim, the Local Service records the reason. Around one
quarter of non-claimants said they had sufficient to live on,
while 6% said it was not worth applying (Figure 2 ).[11]
| 2 |
Reasons for not applying for Pension Credit given by those believed to be entitled |
| Have sufficient to live on |
26% |
| Confidential; do not wish to give reason |
16% |
| Not worth applying |
6% |
| Claim might impact on entitlement to other benefits |
6% |
| Other reasons |
46% |
Source: Evidence Qq 78-79
5. The Department concludes that part of the reason
for low take-up is that pensioners who are better off than before
do not consider themselves poor, even though benefit rates have
risen so that they are entitled to Pension Credit, Housing Benefit
or Council Tax Benefit. In some cases, those not claiming are
entitled to smaller amounts. While for example an estimated 30
to 40% of those eligible for Pension Credit fail to claim it,
the amount they do not claim accounts for some 20 to 30% of the
total entitlement. Take-up of both Council Tax Benefit (£13.10
a week) and the Savings Credit element of Pension Credit is low,
and the average entitlement is lower than for benefits with higher
take-up.[12]
6. Misunderstanding the way benefits work is also
a factor affecting a minority of pensioners. The Department acknowledges
that there is a relationship between the complexity of the system
and non-take-up.[13]
It considers that the 6% who believed claiming one benefit would
adversely affect entitlement to others were almost certainly mistaken.
In fact, claiming a small amount of one benefit may establish
entitlement to others. When The Pension Service discusses entitlements
with people, they explain the links between benefits. Their advice
covers Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit, and Attendance Allowance
(financial help for people over 65 who become disabled) if appropriate,
as well as local authority services. Where people decline to apply,
however, the Agency has to respect their decision.[14]
7. Take-up of the Guarantee Credit element of Pension
Creditwhich is available to the poorest pensionersis
high, suggesting that the Department has been most successful
in reaching those in greatest need. However, there may be pensioners
who are missing out on benefits but who do not have dealings with
any government agencies and so are not in the system at all. It
is inherently difficult to quantify how many such people there
are, as no information is held about them.[15]
8. Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit take-up
rates have declined in recent years despite rises in Council Tax
(Figures 3 and 4 below).[16]
This decline may in part be due to increases in the income thresholds
for entitlement, which has meant that significant numbers of new
customers have become entitled to these benefits. Many are entitled
to relatively small amounts, or will be those who have not had
any previous contact with the benefits system, so they may be
unaware of their eligibility. The Department accepts that it does
not however have a full picture on the reasons for declining take-up
of these benefits. As estimates are at a national level, it is
not possible to identify any relationship between take-up of these
benefits and the performance of the local authorities who administer
them. The Department has also made a number of efforts to increase
take-up of Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit (paragraphs
13 and 14 below) which have not yet been reflected in the take-up
rates.[17]
9. Although take-up of Attendance Allowance has been
rising, it is difficult to determine the desired level of take-up
of disability-related benefits because of the complexity of assessing
eligibility for the benefits. The Department has commissioned
the Policy Studies Institute to research whether it is possible
to obtain sufficient and appropriate data to make an estimate
of take-up. This research will be completed by spring 2007.[18]
10. There are gaps in the Department's knowledge
of benefit take-up, such as those referred to in paragraphs 7
to 9 above. The Department is not planning to commission further
external research but it is trying to exploit the information
collected by the Local Service to make more effective contacts
with pensioners who may be missing out. The Department is also
carrying out specific research into barriers to take-up for black
and minority ethnic groups.[19]
3. Housing Benefit: households receiving benefit, and take-up rates, have both declined
Source: All figures for 1997-98 to 2003-04 are
from Department for Work and Pensions (2006) Income Related Benefits
estimates of take-up. The 2004-05 figure for the number of pensioners
in receipt of Housing Benefit comes from the Department for Work
and Pensions Departmental Report 2005.
Note:
Basis for recipient figures for 2004-05 are inconsistent compared
with recipient figures for 2003-04 and earlier, which are based
on an average through the year.
4. Council Tax Benefit: households receiving benefit, and take-up rates,
have both declined
Source: All figures for 1997-98 to 2003-04 are
from Department for Work and Pensions (2006) Income Related Benefits
estimates of take-up. The 2004-05 figure for the number of pensioners
in receipt of Housing Benefit comes from the Department for Work
and Pensions Departmental Report 2005.
Note: Basis for recipient figures for 2004-05 are inconsistent compared
with recipient figures for 2003-04 and earlier, which are based
on an average through the year.
5 C&AG's Report, paras 1.2, 1.7; Committee of Public
Accounts, Twelfth Report of Session 2002-03, Tackling pensioner
poverty, HC 565 Back
6
Qq 5-6, 82-83, 91-93, Department for Work and Pensions, Income
Related Benefits Estimates of Take-Up in 2004-05, 2006
Back
7
C&AG's Report, paras 2.3, 2.6; Qq 2-5 Back
8
Qq 25-28, 35 Back
9
C&AG's Report, paras 1.7, 2.8; Q 106 Back
10
Q 12, Department for Work and Pensions, Independence and well-being
of older people: baseline report, (2006) Back
11
Qq 8-9, 15-16, 40, 76-79 Back
12
C&AG's Report, para 2.7; Qq 10, 41, 51, 65 Back
13
Q 37 Back
14
Qq 17-22 Back
15
C&AG's Report, para 2.6; Qq 38-39 Back
16
C&AG's Report, para 2.12; Q 68 Back
17
Qq 11, 64-73; Ev 1 Back
18
C&AG's Report, para 2.14; Qq 12-14, 108-111 Back
19
C&AG's Report, para 1.8; Qq 49-52 Back
|