Select Committee on Public Administration Fifth Report


Appendix 1: Letter from Department of Work and Pensions


10 April 2007

Financial Assistance Scheme - additional evidence

Thank you for your letter dated 29 March 2007[23] in which you asked a number of questions relating to the Financial Assistance Scheme. Please find a response to each of these questions attached in the annex.

I hope you find this information helpful. If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

Annex

A.  The estimated number of actual and potential pensioners covered by the extended scheme as announced in Budget 2007.

1.  An estimated additional 100,000 individuals will benefit from the extended Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS) over time. 85,000 will be eligible for the first time, and around 15,000 of the 40,000 people who stood to benefit from FAS under the current scheme, will receive more assistance due to the latest extension.

2.  As a result it is expected that all the estimated 125,000 people who have suffered losses will now receive at least 80% of their core expected pension - around three times the number who would have been helped under the current scheme.

B.  A breakdown of how the Department reached the estimated "total long-term expenditure of £8bn" and details of the assumptions on which this was based. This should include the level of expenditure for each year the Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS) is assumed to be in existence into the future.

3.  The table below shows the estimated annual cash cost of the extended Financial Assistance Scheme as announced in the Budget 2007.





2007/082008/09 2009/102010/112011/12 2012/132013/14
Cash (£m)
24
40
53
60
64
68
78
2014/152015/16 2016/172017/182018/19 2019/202020/21
Cash (£m)
89
102
113
122
130
135
145
2021/222022/23 2023/242024/252025/26 2026/272027/28
Cash (£m)
159
168
176
185
195
203
214
2028/292029/30 2030/312031/322032/33 2033/342034/35
Cash (£m)
223
228
234
238
240
241
241
2035/362036/37 2037/382038/392039/40 2040/412041/42
Cash (£m)
240
238
234
227
220
212
203
2042/432043/44 2044/452045/462046/47 2047/482048/49
Cash (£m)
194
185
176
167
157
148
138
2049/502050/51 2051/522052/532053/54 2054/552055/56
Cash (£m)
129
120
110
102
93
85
76
2056/572057/58 2058/592059/602060/61 2061/622062/63
Cash (£m)
69
61
55
48
42
37
32

4.  The costs presented in the table reflect the assistance levels that will be provided in the extended FAS. The scheme will ensure that the pensions of all eligible members of affected pension schemes are topped up to a level broadly equivalent to 80 per cent of the core pension rights accrued in their scheme. The cap on maximum assistance is £26,000 and there is no de minimis rule.

5.  These cost estimates are based on the same model and data which we have previously used to estimate the costs of the FAS. Data were collected on the numbers and characteristics of 380 pension schemes and specific data were collected on some 1,300 members of a smaller number of schemes thought to be reasonably representative of the total number. To estimate the cost of the FAS, these data, together with scaling parameters, have then been fed into an actuarial model to generate detailed time profiles of costs.

6.  The costs are based on the following key assumptions:

§  125,000 eligible pensioner and non-pensioner members;

§  an average funding level of schemes in respect of non-pensioner members of 30-35%;

§  an average accrued pension for non-pensioner members of £3,300 per year; and

§  longevity estimates from standard tables from the UK actuarial profession's Continuous Mortality Investigation, based on the longevity experienced by pensioners whose pensions are secured with insurance companies.

C.  The estimated cost in net present value terms.

7.  The estimated total cost of the extended FAS in net present value terms is £1.9 billion. This is an additional £1 billion on top of the current FAS scheme.

D.  The estimated additional cost of applying the same indexation rules to payments under the extended FAS as apply to the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) and details of the assumptions on which this estimate is based.

8.  The PPF provides indexation on the part of an individual's pension that derives from pensionable service on or after 6 April 1997. This part will be increased each year in line with the Retail Prices Index (RPI) capped at 2.5%.

9.  In order to qualify for FAS, schemes must have started winding up between January 1997 and April 2005. Data on current qualifying schemes shows that around 60% of schemes had started winding up by the end of 2002. Individuals in FAS schemes are therefore unlikely to have accrued much of their pension after 1997, and providing PPF indexation on those rights would provide them with very little additional benefit.

10.  We have instead estimated the costs of providing indexation on individuals' full accrued pension. We have assumed that the pension in payment would be increased each year in line with RPI capped at 2.5%. The additional cash cost, on top of the current FAS would be £3.5 billion (£530 million in NPV terms).

11.  These costs are based on the same assumptions as in [B] above, but assuming that payments are increased at 2.5% in each year.

E.  The estimated additional cost of providing people eligible for the extended FAS with the same compensation that would be available to them were they eligible for the PPF, and details of the assumptions on which this estimate is based.

12.  The estimated additional cost of providing people eligible for the extended FAS with the same compensation that would be available to them were they eligible for the PPF is £2.7 billion in cash terms (£640 million in net present value terms).

13.  These costs are based on the same assumptions as in B above, but with different assumptions regarding the parameters of the scheme:

§  Individuals receive 90% of their core pension (100% if they were already pensioners when their scheme started to wind up).

§  The compensation cap is set at PPF levels.

§  Indexation is provided on benefits accrued after 1997 only (RPI capped at 2.5%). As we do not hold data on when members accrued their rights, we have assumed that only a small proportion of rights will have been accrued after 1997 (as explained in the answer to D above). We have therefore applied 1% indexation across the board as a proxy for the PPF indexation rules. If anything, this overestimates the amount of indexation individuals are likely to be paid.

F.  The estimated cost of extending FAS to people whose pension funds wound up before April 2005, where the sponsoring employer has not experienced an insolvency event and details of the assumptions on which this is based.

14.  We are unable to estimate the cost of including all schemes that have wound up under-funded with a solvent employer, as there is very limited data on the numbers and circumstances of such schemes. The issue of schemes with solvent employers is complex, as many members of such schemes will have suffered small losses, if any loss at all (for example, where wind up is due to a merger of schemes and members are transferred to a different scheme providing the same benefits).

15.  We do, however, have data on a specific group of schemes with solvent employers - those where the employer has compromised the debt on the pension scheme in order to avoid an insolvency event. We have been made aware of around 15 such schemes with around 8,000 members in total.

16.  Assuming that these schemes are similar to the average FAS scheme (i.e. using the same assumptions as in [B] above), we estimate that the cost of including them in the extended FAS would be around £460 million in cash terms (£110 million in net present value terms).


23   Not printed  Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 11 May 2007