House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2007 - 08
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament

Counter-Terrorism Bill


Counter-Terrorism Bill
Part 5 — Asset freezing proceedings

40

 

(3)   

The UN terrorism orders are—

(a)   

the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2001 (S.I. 2001/3365);

(b)   

the Al-Qa’ida and Taliban (United Nations Measures) Order 2002 (S.I.

2002/111);

(c)   

the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 (S.I. 2006/2657);

5

(d)   

the Al-Qaida and Taliban (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 (S.I.

2006/2952).

(4)   

The Treasury may by order amend subsection (3) by—

(a)   

adding other Orders in Council made under section 1 of the United

Nations Act 1946 (c. 45),

10

(b)   

providing that a reference to a specified Order in Council is to that

Order as amended by a further Order in Council (made after the

passing of this Act), or

(c)   

removing an Order in Council.

(5)   

The order may make consequential amendments of subsection (2) above.

15

(6)   

An order under subsection (4) is subject to negative resolution procedure.

Rules of court, disclosure and related matters

57      

General provisions about rules of court

(1)   

The following provisions apply to rules of court relating to—

(a)   

asset freezing proceedings, or

20

(b)   

proceedings on an appeal relating to asset freezing proceedings.

(2)   

A person making rules of court must have regard to—

(a)   

the need to secure that the decisions that are the subject of the

proceedings are properly reviewed; and

(b)   

the need to secure that disclosures of information are not made where

25

they would be contrary to the public interest.

(3)   

Rules of court may make provision—

(a)   

about the mode of proof and about evidence in the proceedings;

(b)   

enabling or requiring the proceedings to be determined without a

hearing; and

30

(c)   

about legal representation in the proceedings.

(4)   

Rules of court may make provision—

(a)   

enabling the proceedings to take place without full particulars of the

reasons for the decisions to which the proceedings relate being given to

a party to the proceedings (or to any legal representative of that party);

35

(b)   

enabling the court to conduct proceedings in the absence of any person,

including a party to the proceedings (or any legal representative of that

party);

(c)   

about the functions of a person appointed as a special advocate;

(d)   

enabling the court to give a party to the proceedings a summary of

40

evidence taken in the party’s absence.

(5)   

In this section—

(a)   

references to a party to the proceedings do not include the Treasury;

 
 

Counter-Terrorism Bill
Part 5 — Asset freezing proceedings

41

 

(b)   

references to a party’s legal representative do not include a person

appointed as a special advocate.

(6)   

Nothing in this section shall be read as restricting the power to make rules of

court or the matters to be taken into account when doing so.

58      

Rules of court about disclosure

5

(1)   

The following provisions apply to rules of court relating to—

(a)   

asset freezing proceedings, or

(b)   

proceedings on an appeal relating to asset freezing proceedings.

(2)   

Rules of court must secure that the Treasury are required to disclose—

(a)   

material on which they rely,

10

(b)   

material which adversely affects their case, and

(c)   

material which supports the case of a party to the proceedings.

   

This is subject to the following provisions of this section.

(3)   

Rules of court must secure—

(a)   

that the Treasury have the opportunity to make an application to the

15

court for permission not to disclose material otherwise than to—

(i)   

the court, and

(ii)   

any person appointed as a special advocate;

(b)   

that such an application is always considered in the absence of every

party to the proceedings (and every party’s legal representative);

20

(c)   

that the court is required to give permission for material not to be

disclosed if it considers that the disclosure of the material would be

contrary to the public interest;

(d)   

that, if permission is given by the court not to disclose material, it must

consider requiring the Treasury to provide a summary of the material

25

to every party to the proceedings (and every party’s legal

representative);

(e)   

that the court is required to ensure that such a summary does not

contain material the disclosure of which would be contrary to the

public interest.

30

(4)   

Rules of court must secure that in cases where the Treasury—

(a)   

do not receive the court’s permission to withhold material, but elect not

to disclose it, or

(b)   

are required to provide a party to the proceedings with a summary of

material that is withheld, but elect not to provide the summary,

35

   

provision to the following effect applies.

(5)   

The court must be authorised—

(a)   

if it considers that the material or anything that is required to be

summarised might adversely affect the Treasury’s case or support the

case of a party to the proceedings, to direct that the Treasury shall not

40

rely on such points in their case, or shall make such concessions or take

such other steps, as the court may specify, or

(b)   

in any other case, to ensure that the Treasury do not rely on the material

or (as the case may be) on that which is required to be summarised.

 
 

Counter-Terrorism Bill
Part 5 — Asset freezing proceedings

42

 

(6)   

Nothing in this section, or in rules of court made under it, is to be read as

requiring the court to act in a manner inconsistent with Article 6 of the Human

Rights Convention.

(7)   

In this section—

(a)   

references to a party to the proceedings do not include the Treasury;

5

(b)   

references to a party’s legal representative do not include a person

appointed as a special advocate; and

(c)   

“the Human Rights Convention” means the Convention within the

meaning of the Human Rights Act 1998 (c. 42) (see section 21(1) of that

Act).

10

59      

Appointment of special advocate

(1)   

The relevant law officer may appoint a person to represent the interests of a

party to—

(a)   

asset freezing proceedings, or

(b)   

proceedings on an appeal, or further appeal, relating to asset freezing

15

proceedings,

   

in any of those proceedings from which the party (and any legal representative

of the party) is excluded.

   

This is referred to in this Part as appointment as “a special advocate”.

(2)   

A person appointed as a special advocate is not responsible to the party to the

20

proceedings whose interests the person is appointed to represent.

(3)   

The relevant law officer is—

(a)   

in relation to asset freezing proceedings in England and Wales, or on an

appeal or further appeal relating to such proceedings, the Attorney

General;

25

(b)   

in relation to asset freezing proceedings in Scotland, or on an appeal or

further appeal relating to such proceedings, the Advocate General for

Scotland;

(c)   

in relation to asset freezing proceedings in Northern Ireland, or on an

appeal or further appeal relating to such proceedings, the Advocate

30

General for Northern Ireland.

(4)   

A person may be appointed as a special advocate only if—

(a)   

in the case of an appointment by the Attorney General, the person has

a general legal qualification for the purposes of section 71 of the Courts

and Legal Services Act 1990 (c. 41);

35

(b)   

in the case of an appointment by the Advocate General for Scotland, the

person is an advocate or a solicitor who has rights of audience in the

Court of Session or the High Court of Justiciary by virtue of section 25A

of the Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980 (c. 46);

(c)   

in the case of an appointment by the Advocate General for Northern

40

Ireland, the person is a member of the Bar of Northern Ireland.

(5)   

Until the coming into force of section 27 of the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act

2002 (c. 26), references in this section to the Advocate General for Northern

Ireland are to be read as references to the Attorney General for Northern

Ireland.

45

 
 

Counter-Terrorism Bill
Part 5 — Asset freezing proceedings

43

 

   

The coming into force of that section does not affect any appointment of a

person as a special advocate made by the Attorney General for Northern

Ireland before that time.

60      

Intercept evidence

(1)   

Section 18 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (c. 23)

5

(exceptions to exclusion of intercepted communications etc from legal

proceedings) is amended as follows.

(2)   

In subsection (1) (excepted proceedings), after paragraph (da) insert—

“(db)   

any asset freezing proceedings as defined in section 56 of the

Counter-Terrorism Act 2008, or any proceedings arising out of

10

such proceedings;”.

(3)   

In subsection (2) (persons to whom disclosure not to be made), after paragraph

(za) insert—

“(zb)   

in the case of proceedings falling within paragraph (db), to—

(i)   

a person, other than the Treasury, who is or was a party

15

to the proceedings, or

(ii)   

any person who for the purposes of the proceedings (but

otherwise than by virtue of appointment as a special

advocate) represents a person falling within sub-

paragraph (i);”.

20

Supplementary provisions

61      

Allocation of proceedings to Queen’s Bench Division

In paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 to the Supreme Court Act 1981 (c. 54) (business

allocated to the Queen’s Bench Division), after sub-paragraph (ba) insert—

   “(bb)  

all asset freezing proceedings within the meaning of Part 5 of the

25

Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 (see section 56 of that Act);”.

62      

Initial exercise of powers by Lord Chancellor

(1)   

The first time after the passing of this Act that rules of court are made in

exercise of the powers conferred by this Part—

(a)   

in relation to proceedings in England and Wales, or

30

(b)   

in relation to proceedings in Northern Ireland,

   

they may be made by the Lord Chancellor instead of by the person who would

otherwise make them.

(2)   

Before making rules of court under this section, the Lord Chancellor must

consult—

35

(a)   

in relation to rules applicable to proceedings in England and Wales, the

Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales;

(b)   

in relation to rules applicable to proceedings in Northern Ireland, the

Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland.

   

The Lord Chancellor is not required to undertake any other consultation before

40

making the rules.

 
 

Counter-Terrorism Bill
Part 6 — Inquests and inquiries

44

 

(3)   

The requirements of subsection (2)(a) and (b) may be satisfied by consultation

that took place wholly or partly before the passing of this Act.

(4)   

Rules of court made by the Lord Chancellor under this section—

(a)   

must be laid before Parliament, and

(b)   

if not approved by a resolution of each House before the end of 40 days

5

beginning with the day on which they were made, cease to have effect

at the end of that period.

   

In reckoning the period of 40 days no account shall be taken of any time during

which Parliament is dissolved or prorogued or during which both Houses are

adjourned for more than four days.

10

(5)   

If rules cease to have effect in accordance with subsection (4)—

(a)   

that does not affect anything previously done in reliance on the rules;

and

(b)   

subsection (1) applies as if the rules had not been made.

(6)   

The following provisions do not apply to rules of court made by the Lord

15

Chancellor under this section—

(a)   

section 3(6) of the Civil Procedure Act 1997 (c. 12) (Parliamentary

procedure for civil procedure rules);

(b)   

section 56 of the Judicature (Northern Ireland) Act 1978 (c. 23)

(statutory rules procedure).

20

   

Until section 85 of the Courts Act 2003 (c. 39) (process for making civil

procedure rules) comes into force, in paragraph (a) above for “section 3(6)”

substitute “section 3(2)”.

63      

Interpretation of Part 5

In this Part—

25

“asset freezing decision” has the meaning given by section 56(2);

“asset freezing proceedings” has the meaning given by section 56(1);

“rules of court” means rules for regulating the practice and procedure to

be followed in the High Court or the Court of Appeal or in the Court of

Session;

30

“special advocate” means a person appointed under section 59;

“UN terrorism order” means an order specified in section 56(3).

Part 6

Inquests and inquiries

64      

Certificate requiring inquest to be held without a jury

35

(1)   

In section 8 of the Coroners Act 1988 (c. 13) (duty to hold inquest), after

subsection (7) insert—

“(8)   

This section is subject to section 8A (certificate requiring inquest to be

held without a jury).”.

 
 

Counter-Terrorism Bill
Part 6 — Inquests and inquiries

45

 

(2)   

After that section insert—

“8A     

Certificate requiring inquest to be held without a jury

(1)   

The Secretary of State may certify in relation to an inquest that, in the

opinion of the Secretary of State, the inquest will involve the

consideration of material that should not be made public—

5

(a)   

in the interests of national security,

(b)   

in the interests of the relationship between the United Kingdom

and another country, or

(c)   

otherwise in the public interest.

(2)   

A certificate may be issued—

10

(a)   

in relation to an inquest that has not begun, or

(b)   

in relation to an inquest that has begun, at any time before its

conclusion.

(3)   

Where a certificate has effect in relation to an inquest, the inquest must

be held or (as the case may be) continued without a jury, so that—

15

(a)   

if a jury has not been summoned, the coroner must not summon

a jury, and

(b)   

if a jury has been summoned, the coroner must discharge the

jury.

(4)   

Accordingly, the following do not apply in relation to the inquest

20

whilst the certificate has effect—

(a)   

the power under subsection (1) or (4) of section 8 to hold the

inquest or part of the inquest with a jury, and

(b)   

the duty under subsection (3) of that section to hold the inquest

with a jury in the circumstances set out in that subsection.

25

(5)   

A certificate has effect in relation to an inquest until it is revoked by the

Secretary of State; and the Secretary of State may revoke a certificate in

respect of an inquest—

(a)   

before it has begun, or

(b)   

after it has begun, at any time before its conclusion.

30

(6)   

Where a certificate issued in relation to an inquest is revoked—

(a)   

if subsection (3) of section 8 applies in relation to the inquest, the

coroner must summon a jury in the manner required by

subsection (2) of that section, and

(b)   

otherwise, if it appears to the coroner that there is any reason for

35

summoning a jury, the coroner may summon a jury in that

manner.

(7)   

If a jury is summoned—

(a)   

the coroner must proceed in all respects as if the inquest had not

previously begun, and

40

(b)   

the provisions of this Act apply accordingly as if that were the

case.”.

(3)   

This section has effect in relation to inquests that have begun, but have not

been concluded, before the day on which it comes into force as well as to

inquests beginning on or after that day.

45

 
 

 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Revised 24 January 2008