Select Committee on Business and Enterprise Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Standard Chartered Bank

    —  Standard Chartered PLC is listed on both the London Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and is consistently ranked in the top 25 among FTSE-100 companies by market capitalisation.

    —  Standard Chartered has a history of over 150 years in banking and operates in many of the world's fastest-growing markets with an extensive global network of over 1,400 branches (including subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures) in 56 countries in the Asia Pacific Region, South Asia, the Middle East, Africa, the United Kingdom and the Americas.

    —  As one of the world's most international banks, Standard Chartered employs approximately 60,000 people, representing over 100 nationalities, worldwide.

    —  Serving both retail and corporate banking customers, Standard Chartered derives over 90% of profits from Asia, Africa and the Middle East.

SUMMARY OF STANDARD CHARTERED OPERATIONS IN INDIA

    —  Standard Chartered is the largest foreign bank in India, having opened its first branches in Kolkata, India and in Shanghai, China in 1858. The Bank has 15,092 employees, 117 branches and corporate offices in 31 cities. Standard Chartered has 2.1 million retail customers and over 1,000 corporate customers, generating US$817 million in revenue in 2006.

    —  Scope International is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Group, based in Chennai. Scope provides IT enabled services, including back office processing, software development, system support, transaction processing as well as human resources support.

    —  India is the bank's third largest market, after Hong Kong and Korea.

OUR ASPIRATIONS FOR OUR INDIA OPERATIONS

    —  To ensure that India is integral to Standard Chartered's aspiration to be the world's best international bank, leading the way in Asia, Africa and the Middle East.

    —  To partner India in its growth ambitions by providing a comprehensive range of personal banking products and services to its emerging middle class, by offering a full range of traditional and structured finance solutions to its corporate clients and by engaging in the drive to eradicate poverty through development of microfinance initiatives.

    —  To foster the increasing flows of trade and investment to and from India. Standard Chartered Bank India is itself a successful example of foreign direct investment but it has also helped facilitate almost $2 billion of FDI into India in the last two years. It has also played a leading role in supporting flows of investment from India to the UK and elsewhere. Standard Chartered was the lead arranger in the Tata-Corus acquisition.

    —  To play a leading role in the community through its corporate social responsibility programmes for the restoration of eyesight, HIV/AIDS awareness, and disaster relief. The Bank sponsors India's largest public participation sports event: the annual Mumbai Marathon.

    —  To promote continued liberalisation of India's financial markets through dialogue with the Indian authorities and regulators and support for initiatives, such as the proposed EU-India Free Trade Agreement, which may help remove the current barriers imposed on foreign banks.

CHALLENGES OF OPERATING IN INDIA

  The banking industry has a crucial role to play in accelerating the development of emerging economies and nowhere is that truer than in India where, for a variety of historical reasons, this sector has been heavily regulated and dominated by government-owned entities. There has been a growing awareness in India that imperfections in the banking market creates barriers to opportunity and increases costs for small and large enterprises. A properly functioning financial market helps to connect businesses with lenders and investors with funds to put into ventures is critical to future success.

  Over the past few years, there have been moves by the Indian authorities to address some of the obstacles to development of efficient financial markets. Domestic private banks have been encouraged, and have achieved considerable success since they entered the market after 1994. There have been a series of steps taken to deregulate the market such as a reduction of the statutory liquidity ratio, deregulation of lending and deposit rates; freedom in credit delivery systems; the introduction of prudential accounting norms and allowing entry of private sector banks.

  Nevertheless, India remains a challenging market for foreign-owned banks. As noted in paragraph 86 of the Select Committee's report on "Trade and Investment Opportunities with India", there continue to be a series of limits on the ability of those banks to make acquisitions in existing Indian banks and, in some respects, the regulations of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on branch regulatory capital and branch authorisation have tightened in recent years. Foreign banks are not allowed to expand their branch or ATM network without prior authorisation from the RBI and in September 2005 a new "Branch Authorisation Policy" extended the definition of a "branch" to include credit card centres and back/administrative offices. Foreign banks now need to submit, on an annual basis, their requirements for all branches, credit card centres and bank/administrative offices and ATMs for the year ahead. This "annual plan" is then subject to extensive scrutiny which involves considerable delays. In scrutinising such applications, the RBI is required to take into account a number of additional parameters including:

    (i)  the track record of compliance of the bank and functioning in the global markets;

    (ii)  even distribution of home countries of foreign banks having a presence in India;

    (iii)  the treatment extended to India bank in the home country of the applicant bank; and

    (iv)  bilateral and diplomatic relations between India and the home country.

  The Indian government has a WTO commitment to approve 12 new branch licenses for all foreign banks each year. In recent years that figure has sometimes been exceeded but the total cap has not been increased to reflect the growing scale of the Indian banking market or the degree of interest shown by existing and potential foreign bank investors. There are over 30 international banks operating in India.

  In addition, foreign banks face a variety of other barriers including a discrimatory rate of tax (at rates of 48% compared to 35.7% for domestic banks), access to government public sector undertaking deposits and access to local currency subordinated debt. There are also difficulties implementing the Indian government's priority sector lending policies, which require the banks to undertake direct lending to specific sectors despite the limits on their branch networks.

  The Indian government's "road-map" for banking liberalisation anticipates that from April 2009 there will be a removal of some of the restrictions imposed on wholly-owned subsidiaries of foreign banks so that, in principle, they will then be dealt with on a par with domestic banks. Subsidiaries will be allowed to list and dilute their stake so that at least 26% of the paid-up capital of the subsidiary is held by resident Indians. Foreign banks may be permitted, subject to regulatory approval, to enter into merger and acquisition transactions with any private sector bank, subject to an overall investment limit of 74%. No details of how this plan will be implemented have yet been announced.

DOMESTIC PRESSURES FOR LIBERALISATION

  A growing number of commentators have pointed to the need for greater clarity over the scope and pace of market access liberalisation for foreign banks. Some of these pressures are domestic, and some external.

  Domestically, there is growing realisation that over-regulation and restrictions on foreign investment may be impeding the ability of the banking industry in India to respond to the needs of a rapidly-growing economy. In March 2006, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh outlined his ambition for Mumbai to become not only a regional but a global financial hub, not unlike Shanghai. Mumbai has obvious advantages as a financial hub; centrally placed between Tokyo and New York to take advantage of good time zone trading, and strong cultural links, with the lowest cost of operations in the world.

  In April 2007, a High Powered Expert Committee (HPEC), consisting of 15 senior Indian experts published a 280-page report on how to develop India's financial services sector and Mumbai as an international financial sector. The report made 48 different recommendations, including a proposal to accelerate the pace of market liberalisation, fully opening up banking, insurance, securities, legal and the accountancy sectors to attract first class international firms without any hindrance. It remains to be seen whether the report's recommendation will be implemented.

EXTERNAL PRESSURES FOR LIBERALISATION

  India is a signatory to the WTO's General Agreement on Trade in Services and has made a limited number of commitments in the banking sector (such as the binding of the commitment to approve 12 new bank branches a year). In the current WTO Doha Development Round, India has stated that it supports an ambitious outcome to the negotiations in the services chapter but no specific commitments on banking have yet been tabled.

  India has also reached a number of bilateral agreements with third party trading partners for liberalisation of trade. At least one of these agreements, with Singapore, has included provisions on the national treatment of banks from each country. But these concessions have been limited to no more than three banks on either side. British banks with significant investments in India and Singapore are not, therefore, beneficiaries.

  On 23 April 2007, EU member states ratified a proposal by the European Commission for an EU-India free trade agreement which would cover trade in services. Standard Chartered Bank strongly supports this initiative which could, if successful, fundamentally alter UK-India trade and investment relations. The Bank argues that such an agreement should focus on improving economic relations and opening up markets rather than focusing on broader political, social or environmental issues which are the subject of discussions in other established fora.

UK INDIA RELATIONS

  In their report of 13 June 2006, the Select Committee recommended that the UK Government should encourage the Indian Government to liberalise fully the service sector and strongly urge the complete opening up of the financial services market in India.

  Standard Chartered Bank strongly supports this recommendation and is pleased to note that it has been followed up in a number of ways. Agreement was subsequently reached on the establishment of a financial services working group of JETCO which met in New Delhi in January 2007. Standard Chartered Bank participated in those discussions with Indian counterparts in the financial services industry and will continue to support this new dialogue. The Bank was also represented on the business delegation which accompanied the Secretary of State for Trade, Alistair Darling, and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown, on their visit to India in January 2007. Standard Chartered is an active participant in bilateral contacts organised by IBPN, ISFL, the City of London Corporation and is a member of UKTI's Financial Services Sector Advisory Board which recently considered a new strategy for the India market.

CONCLUSION

  The UK should have natural advantages in trading with India; it has strong historical and cultural linkages with India and a prosperous 1.3 million population living in the UK. Standard Chartered, as the largest foreign bank in India would like to see the UK build stronger trading links with this economic giant. By continuing to build stronger links between the UK and India, facilitating India's growing business ties with the rest of the world, by providing opportunities for Asian students to learn and work in the UK, and most importantly by throwing its weight behind the EU-India FTA, the trading relationship between the UK and India will prosper.

June 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 21 April 2008