Select Committee on Business and Enterprise Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Citizens Advice Bureau

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  1.  Citizens Advice is very pleased to be able to contribute to the select committee's timely inquiry into the uncompetitive character of the energy market and energy prices. Our comments focus predominantly on part of the inquiry which deals with "progress in reducing fuel poverty and the appropriate policy instruments for doing so." In particular, we consider the impact that rising energy prices have had on CAB clients, who are often among the most vulnerable members of society, and the consequent growth in the level of fuel debts.

  2. The recent anouncements made in the 2008 Budget statement were very welcome since they heralded a determination to secure a narrowing of the differential between fuel prepayment meters and other prices, an increase in the Winter Fuel Allowance, and plans for a significant increase in fuel suppliers' social programmes. The three-fold increase in the amount spent on social programmes by suppliers—from £50 million a year at present to at least £150 million per year over the period ahead—offers the potential to make major progress in tackling fuel poverty. Yet to truly make a difference it will be imperative that this increase in spending is overseen to ensure that it is spent in the most effective ways.

  3. In our view the interventions announced in the Budget statement are overdue and very much required. Citizens Advice has for some time called for more action to help those on low incomes who are struggling to cope with rising fuel bills, for example by calling on fuel companies to equalise the difference in tariffs between prepayment users and direct debit customers.

  4. CAB evidence shows that many people are struggling to heat their homes and that a broad and sustained programme of remedial measures is taken to tackle this problem and supplement the announcements made in the recent Budget. This should comprise:

    —  extension of the Winter Fuel Payment to other vulnerable groups who currently are excluded from the scheme;

    —  a comprehensive benefit take-up campaign be launched—this approach has a proven track record in delivering significant benefits to large numbers of people in fuel poverty in the most cost-efficient manner; and

    —  an increase in the funding of the Warm Front programme, plus resolution, as a matter of urgency, of the significant problem of funding shortfalls for Warm Front and the consequent need for top-ups from eligible consumers, which currently undermines the impact of the programme.

INTRODUCTION

  5. The Citizens Advice service provides free, independent, confidential and impartial advice to everyone on their rights and responsibilities. It values diversity, promotes equality and challenges discrimination. The service aims: to provide the advice people need for the problems they face; and to improve the policies and practices that affect people's lives.

  6. The Citizens Advice Bureaux (CAB) network is the largest independent network of free advice centres in Europe, providing advice from over 3,200 outlets throughout Wales, England and Northern Ireland. We provide advice from a range of outlets, including GPs' surgeries, hospitals, community centres, county courts and magistrates' courts, and mobile services both in rural areas and to serve particular dispersed groups.

  7. In 2006/7, the CAB service dealt with 5.7 million enquiries on the whole range of issues bureaux give advice on, including 1.7 million on debt.

  8. The CAB service has seen a significant increase in inquiries on fuel issues over recent years. In 2006/07 we received 60,000 new enquiries specifically about fuel debts—an increase of 33% on the previous year. In addition, the service dealt with 47,000 enquiries about a range of other fuel matters, a 74% increase on 2005/06.

THE IMPACT OF RISING PRICES ON CONSUMERS

  9. The recent spate of large price rises announced by all the major fuel suppliers means that consumers have seen massive rises in their annual energy bills, with energy prices currently about 50% above their 2003 levels in real terms. Such hefty price rises are hitting vulnerable people and those on low incomes particularly hard, especially since they have been accompanied by rises in other essential expenditure—rises which show no sign of slowing, for example water and sewerage bills are set to rise by an average of 5.8% for the average household from April 2008 while council tax bills will increase on average by 4.0% in England in 2008-09.[39]

  10. Benefit income and wages have failed to keep pace with such increases and their impact can be seen in the significant rise in the number of enquiries relating to fuel debt and disconnection dealt with by Citizens Advice Bureaux. Annual statistics released by Citizens Advice for 2006-7 reveal that many hundreds of thousands of people are increasingly struggling to meet their day-to-day living expenses, with problems relating to gas and electricity debt shooting up by 33% on the previous year. More recently, new figures released by Citizens Advice about debt problems dealt with in the first two months of 2008 reveal continuing increases in problems relating to basic essentials such as gas and electricity, water, telephone and council tax debts.[40]

  11. In addition, energywatch found that a comparison of the same three-month period in 2004 and 2007 shows there has been a 64% rise in consumers owing more than £600 on their electricity bills and an 19% rise in consumers owing more than £600 on their gas bills.[41]

  12. Large price rises have reversed some of the progress previously made in eradicating fuel poverty, with the Fuel Poverty Advisory Group's (FPAG) annual report 2007 stating that "it is likely that in 2007 there were about 2.9m households and 2.3m vulnerable households in fuel poverty in England—the highest levels for nearly a decade."[42]

  13. The increased flow of individual cases reported by CABx describing how clients are struggling to make ends meet demonstrates the difficulties faced by people on low fixed incomes in attempting to cope with massive rises to their fuel bills:

    A CAB in Buckinghamshire reported that their client, a man with long term physical and mental health problems, came to the CAB for money advice since he had a number of priority debts to sort out. The client is in receipt of short term, lower rate incapacity benefit of £59.20 per week but his ongoing payments for gas, electricity and water account for approximately half his weekly income. Since it is difficult for him to meet essential expenditure and have sufficient available income to offer creditors, he has made the decision to not use his gas heating as he says he cannot afford to pay this and his other priority commitments.

    A Lincolnshire CAB reported a case in which their clients, a young couple in their twenties in rented accommodation with good jobs and a 2-year-old child, had been managing to repay debts which they had previously accumulated. However, the spate of recent household fuel rises have tipped the balance of their precarious finances and pushed them into a state where they cannot afford to maintain their repayments at current level. As a consequence they are sinking deeper into debt.

    A Leicestershire CAB client, a disabled man in his fifties, came to the bureau for assistance because he was extremely worried about paying his electricity bill. His electricity supplier had increased their prices by 34% in the last year, meaning that the client was now unable to afford regular electricity payments and was faced with the prospect of getting into debt or self-disconnecting from his electricity supply.

    A CAB in Buckinghamshire reported that their client, a man with long term physical and mental health problems, came to the CAB for money advice since he had a number of priority debts to sort out. The client is in receipt of short term, lower rate incapacity benefit of £59.20 per week but his ongoing payments for gas, electricity and water account for approximately half his weekly income. Since it is difficult for him to meet essential expenditure and have sufficient available income to offer creditors, he has made the decision to not use his gas heating as he says he cannot afford to pay this and his other priority commitments.

    A CAB in the East of England saw a disabled client who was living in fuel poverty. The client was in receipt of Disability Living Allowance (DLA) and Income Support and relies on storage heaters to heat her home. Her total cash income is approximately £70 per week. Out of this she is paying throughout the year in excess of £30 per week on her electricity. If she did not have DLA she would find it difficult to afford any heating to speak of at all. The client felt that she had to choose between being cold and being hungry.

POLICY RESPONSES TO FUEL POVERTY AND RISING PRICES

  14. The government has set itself the extremely challenging target of abolishing fuel poverty for vulnerable households by 2010 and for all households by 2016—we would argue that it needs to give itself the tools to give it a fighting chance of meeting this target.

  15. As we state above, we welcome the measures contained in the recent Budget statement including the rises in the Winter Fuel Payment, the commitment to reduce the differential between prepayment meters and other means of payment and plans for a significant increase in fuel suppliers' social programmes.

  16. We recommend a number of complementary measures: extending eligibility for the Winter Fuel Payment; launching a comprehensive and sustained benefits take-up campaign; and increasing the funding for Warm Front and reviewing the way it currently works in order to overcome present shortcomings.

EXTENDING ELIGIBILITY FOR THE WINTER FUEL PAYMENT

  17. Citizens Advice welcomed the increases in the Winter Fuel Payment, as announced in the 2008 Budget Statement. These increases will certainly be welcomed by pensioners. However, it is important to note that while the Winter Fuel Payment is highly valued by many pensioners it is a very poorly targeted benefit, with all pensioners—regardless of income—entitled to it. It is therefore understandable that proposals for more targeted use of this money to alleviate fuel poverty has been advanced, for example the Fuel Poverty Advisory Group (FPAG) has suggested discontinuing Winter Fuel Payments for higher rate tax payers, which would free up over £200m pa which could be used to fund increases in the Warm Front programme.[43] In our view, this proposal has much to recommend it provided that such a change to a system based on means-testing does not adversely affect levels of take-up among eligible pensioners.

  18. We also recommend that consideration is given to extending eligibility to winter fuel payments to other groups who may live on low benefit incomes and struggle to afford their fuel bills. Such groups might include people under 60 years of age including disabled people, people with a long-term illness, and households with young or disabled children. This measure would provide help to such groups in the short-term. Over the longer term it would be preferable to look at raising levels of benefit income, or perhaps consider uprating benefit levels more closely to fuel prices.

LAUNCHING A COMPREHENSIVE BENEFITS CHECKING SERVICE

  19. The government should consider proper funding for holistic benefits advice, which would allow people to claim benefits currently unclaimed as well as providing information about getting a better energy deal, helping with energy efficiency measures etc. Government research has shown that "income improvements were the most important factor in reducing fuel poverty", with 61 per cent of the reduction in fuel poverty since 1996 attributable to improvements in incomes.[44] Funding holistic benefits advice is therefore the most efficient way of tackling fuel poverty and this exercise would go a long way towards putting extra money in people's pockets and enabling them to pay their bills with dignity.

  20. Citizens Advice Bureaux already provide a great deal of advice to clients when helping them to resolve their problems. In 2006-07 bureaux dealt with more than 5.7m problems, helping approximately two million clients. Additional funding for holistic benefits advice would enable bureaux to supplement this with proactive benefit take-up campaigns, targeting people who may not visit bureaux and who may be unaware they are missing out on benefit income that they are entitled to. Information about the impact that such campaigns can have and the key factors necessary for successful campaigns is provided in Serious benefits—the success of CAB take-up campaigns, (Citizens Advice, April 2003).

  21. Such efforts are very much needed, with official estimates suggesting that up to four in 10 pensioners entitled to pension credit are not getting the extra cash they are due, and that as much as £2.5 billion went unclaimed in the financial year 2005/06, the most recent year for which figures are available.[45] The amount of Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit not being claimed is also large, and take-up of these benefits has actually declined in recent years.

  22. Recently three Citizens Advice Bureaux have started to work in partnership with Ofgem, the energy regulator, to pilot a campaign to (i) make sure people are getting the best deal for their energy and; (ii) to provide information about what help is available from the energy industry and government for people struggling to pay gas and electricity bills. This work is particularly focussed on encouraging people with prepayment meters to exercise their ability to switch supplier to get a better deal. The pilots are targeted at frontline workers (eg CAB advisers and housing association advisers) who can spread the message to people they deal with as part of their everyday work, as well as to customers themselves.

  23. Learning from these small-scale pilots is likely to be invaluable in coordinating efforts to target a range of help and assistance with affordability of fuel to third-parties and customers.

INCREASED FUNDING FOR WARM FRONT PROGRAMME PLUS REVIEW OF CURRENT OPERATION

  24. In the Comprehensive Spending Review it was decided to cut the annual Warm Front budget by nearly 25% for the period 2008-2011. The decision to cut one of the government's principal means of tackling fuel poverty in England was deeply regrettable at a time when rising fuel prices have pushed the numbers of people living in fuel poverty to their highest for almost a decade.

  25. Warm Front annual expenditure should, in the 2008-11 period, be restored to at least its 2007-08 level of £350m per annum. The Fuel Poverty Advisory Group (FPAG) has suggested a number of sources where funding for this expenditure, and we would encourage government to look closely at the options outlined.

  26. Although very supportive of the Warm Front programme in principle, many Citizens Advice Bureaux have reported difficulties experienced in the operation of the scheme. This issue was debated in Parliament on 3 March 2008 and the problems highlighted mirror many of those experienced by CAB clients. In general, the problems with Warm Front relate to the costs quoted by authorised contractors for carrying out work, the failure of the Warm Front grant to cover the cost of work required and the consequent need for applicants to find substantial sums to `top-up' the grant. The following cases highlight these difficulties:

    A CAB in the West Midlands reported that their client, aged 69, came to the bureau as his boiler stopped working in December 2007 and he had no hot water or heating during the coldest months of the year. The client had received independent estimates for a replacement boiler and was advised that the cost would be between £1,300—£1,700. He was then told by a friend that he might be entitled to a Warm Front Grant to assist with payment. The client therefore made an application to Warm Front and was informed that he had qualified for a Grant of £2,700. Given that he expected the grant to easily cover the cost of the new boiler, the client also asked for replacement radiators as his were over 20 years old. The client was sent a letter from Warm Front, stating that the total cost of the work recommended would be £3,821.81, meaning that the client needed to pay £1,255.36 towards this figure.

    A CAB in County Durham reported a case in which their client, aged 63 and in receipt of pension credit, received a Warm Front grant for the cost of installing oil-fired central heating worth £4,000. However, the total cost of the work was £6,960.67 so the client was expected to find the excess of £2,960.67 before the work could be carried out. The client could not afford to pay nearly £3,000 and so had to continue living in an inadequately heated home. The client contacted a local heating company that informed her that in their estimation the work should cost approximately £4,000.

    A Middlesex CAB's client reported a distinct difference between the prices quoted by local heating engineers and the Warm Front approved contractor. The client, a widowed female, aged 79 and in receipt of Pension Credit, was awarded a Warm Front grant of £2,700 but the cost of the work was £3,460.63, with the balance to be paid by client. The client was unhappy with this quote as she had also obtained quotations from local companies, the highest of which was £3,100. The client was also understandably concerned that the Warm Front approved contractor was based almost 300 miles away in Sunderland, and she might therefore experience problems contacting them if anything were to go wrong with the new boiler.

  27. Along with other consumer organizations, Citizens Advice has highlighted the inadequacy of the grant and the consequent need for eligible customers to find large sums of money before the work can be carried out, for some considerable time. Improvements have not yet materialized and a number of Citizens Advice Bureaux now report that they may soon start to think twice before referring clients to apply to the Warm Front programme. Citizens Advice recommends that a solution is found as a matter of urgency to the significant problem of funding shortfalls for Warm Front, and the consequent need for top-ups from eligible consumers, which currently undermines the impact of the programme.

April 2008












39   Oral Statement by John Healey MP, Minister of State for Local Government, Department for Communitites and Local Government, 27 March 2008 Back

40   Many more seek help with mortgage arrears-new Citizens Advice figures, Citizens Advice, Press Release, 18 March 2008 Back

41   Serious energy debt taking toll of consumers, energywatch, Press Release, 25 January 2008 Back

42   Fuel Poverty Advisory Group-Sixth Annual Report, 2007, p.4 Back

43   Fuel Poverty Advisory Group-Sixth Annual Report, 2007 Back

44   The UK Fuel Poverty Strategy-3rd Annual Progress Report 2005, Defra and DTI, p.27 Back

45   Source: Department for Work and Pensions Income Related Benefits Take-Up Estimates 05/06 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 28 July 2008