Select Committee on Business and Enterprise Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by John Huggins

UK NATURAL GAS COMPETITION

1.  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  1.1  There is strong evidence to suggest that competition is working for large industrial gas consumers but is no longer working for small consumers.

  1.2  this evidence is based on BERR's own figues and shows that the price differential between the largest and the smallest consumers has more than doubled since the third quarter of 2005 and in the third quarter of 2007 was around 40p/therm.

  1.3  The differential between large and small consumers is justified by the higher transmission, distribution and administration costs associated with small consumers and there is no evidence that these costs have more than doubled over the two year period.

2.  PERSONAL INTRODUCTION

  2.1  I have 40 years' experience in the energy industry, most of it in senior commercial positions buying or transporting gas.

  2.2  My last employed position was a Director of Gas Transportation at British Gas.

  2.3  I now work as an independent commercial gas advisor and have worked in several countries.

3.  GAS PRICES 2004-07

  3.1  Chart 1 shows how gas prices to non-domestic consumers[276] has varied, depending on size, between the first quarter 2004 and the third quarter 2007.

  3.2  Until the third quarter of 2005 the prices moved more or less in line.

  3.3  In the fourth quarter of 2005 there was a substantial increase in all prices and thereafter prices no longer moved in line, as the prices to the largest consumers dropped back to around their original level, while prices to the smallest consumers remained high.

Chart 1



4.  GAS PRICE DIFFERENTIALS

  4.1  Chart 2 shows the differentials between prices to the largest consumers and others.

  4.2  The historic differential between the largest and the smallest consumers averaged between 9 and 18p/therm until the third quarter of 2005. A significant differential is to be expected because of the higher transmission and distribution costs associated with the smaller consumers.

  4.3  By the third quarter of 2007 this differential had widened to over 40p/therm. This would appear to indicate an increase in the profitability of the smallest consumers of over 20p/therm unless, of course, sellers were making a loss on sales to the largest consumers in the third quarter of 2007.

  4.4  There is here evidence that competition is working well for large consumers, but progressively, less well for smaller consumers.

  4.5  Directly comparable figures are not available for domestic consumers but the category of very small non-domestic consumers can be considered a good prosy for domestic consumers.

Chart 2


5 February 2008






276   Quarterly Energy Prices: Table 3.4.1 Prices of fuels purchased by non-domestic consumers in the United Kingdom (excluding the Climate Change Levy). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 28 July 2008