A new inter-governmental forum
62. Political and economic links with Turkey
are strong, and are being strengthened. A new bilateral 'strategic
partnership' was agreed on 23 October 2007 during the Turkish
Prime Minister's visit to the UK.[161]
Not only will it promote bilateral trade and investment, and support
Turkey's EU accession bid, but the partnership would also include
"defence, global security, promotion of the transatlantic
partnership, regional stability and peace, tackling climate change,
promotion of education and culture".[162]
UKTI's strategy speaks of establishing a UK-Turkey "high
level Government to Government forum".[163]
The Trade Minister told us there had been delays resulting from
"inactivity at the Turkish end",[164]
but that the Government to Government forum would meet
for the first time when he visited Turkey in September.[165]
The Minister said he hoped the forum would focus on one or two
priorities for the year ahead, and appeared to imply that the
problems encountered by the UK alcoholic drinks industry could
be on the forum's agenda.[166]
63. UKTI officials said the forum would not be
as "complicated" as existing 'JETCOs',[167]
the bilateral joint economic and trade committees established
with China, India and Brazil. Although he held out the prospect
of development in "three to four years' time",[168]
the Trade Minister was clear that for the time being the forum
would only operate at the ministerial level, rather than taking
the multi-faceted approach of a JETCO. The CBI supported the strategic
partnership,[169] and
said that "legal enforcement of existing obligations"
should be its top priority, followed by an examination of "ways
of enhancing the reform process which takes forward the process
of creating a better economic circumstance in Turkey from which
British companies can benefit."[170]
However, it warned that the forum needed to "actually deliver",[171]
and that it was important to ensure that
any structure takes effective input from the business
community and provides a way for the business community to continue
to highlight the difficulties that exist, and indeed find ways
of delivering effective results. As you know from our previous
evidence, we are not greatly supportive of talk shops.[172]
64. The TBBC considered the forum offered an
opportunity to "fast track review" of disputes,[173]
but they too hoped that the forum would not be "just another
thing that is signed and then forgotten about".[174]
They said the TBBC could take on "a more significant role"
with the forum, subject to "proper resource".[175]
A UKTI official said that TBBC could meet alongside the forum,[176]
and that UKTI expected that the forum would be "working very
closely with" TBBC in identifying issues.[177]
65. We welcome the planned inter-governmental
forum between the United Kingdom and Turkey. It should both help
to resolve bilateral problems and enable discussion of wider problems
which are unlikely to be resolved early in the accession process.
Rather than functioning as a general 'talking shop', the forum
might best demonstrate its effectiveness by first dealing with
a limited number of the most significant barriers to increasing
the economic ties between the United Kingdom and Turkey. The forum
needs to engage properly with the private sector to be effective.
The TBBC, as the 'voice of business' in UK-Turkey relations, must
have an important part to play in this. We look forward to further
details of how the forum will function in the Government's response,
along with details of how practical outcomes will be measured.
We agree that the multi-faceted JETCO model isas yetunsuitable
for Turkey.
116