Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Written Evidence


Memorandum by the South East England Regional Housing Board

  1.  The South East England Regional Housing Board (RHB) is a partnership board. It is responsible for identifying regional priorities for housing investment through the Regional Housing Strategy (RHS) and providing advice to ministers on the allocation of investment in affordable housing in the region.

  2.  The Board's investment programme for 2006-8 gives priority to increasing the supply of new affordable housing, allocating 92% of the funding available to the provision of additional affordable housing with the remainder targeted at private sector renewal and local authority decent homes.

  3.  The comprehensive evidence base developed by the Regional Assembly in preparing the draft South East Plan (the Regional Spatial Strategy) and the Regional Housing Strategy underpins the work of the Board. The draft South East Plan provides for an annual average of 28,900 net additional dwellings between 2006 and 2026.

  4.  The evidence base shows a backlog of 29,000 households in need of social rented housing or private rented housing with the support of housing benefit. Analysis of affordability shows that although some households can afford forms of home ownership, there is a core need for social rented housing, and that 25% of new housing to be social rented and 10% other forms of affordable housing.

  5.  This requirement is set out in the draft South East Plan. In order to fulfill it the region needs to deliver 7225 social rented homes and 2890 other forms of affordable housing per year (10,115 in total). (See Table 1)

  6.  The Regional Housing Strategy published in 2006 gives priority to:

    —  increasing the supply of affordable housing and in particular new social rented housing to meet identified need;

    —  achieving the Government target of halving the number of homeless households in temporary accommodation by 2010; and

    —  addressing the needs of the most vulnerable and those with support needs.

  Alongside this, it recognises the value of mixed-tenure/ mixed-income developments to achieve sustainable communities and support economic growth.

  7.  The region's annual monitoring indicates a significant increase in housing completions in recent years. Completions have increased from just over 25,000 per year in 2001-02 to 33,300 in year ending March 2006.

The evidence indicates that increased public sector investment in delivering affordable housing is increasing the number of completions.

  8.  The 2006-8 affordable housing programme is on track to deliver significantly more homes overall and particularly social rented housing than in the previous two years (Table 2). Nonetheless, social rented provision falls short of the current level of planned growth in the draft South East Plan by 2560 homes per year. Further progress will be difficult to achieve without additional public sector funding. This reflects the higher cost of providing social rented housing and the need for grants to be made available in order to ensure the financial viability of development sites.

  9.  The Implementation Plan for the draft South East Plan identifies a role for the RHB in maximising opportunities to act as a catalyst for the delivery of affordable housing. The Board is already taking action by:

    —  Working with local authorities and the Housing Corporation on improving the assessment of financial viability of sites for housing development to make cost effective use of public funds. Recent research indicates that acute affordability problems occur in urban areas within the region and are caused by a diverse range of factors which cannot be addressed by a single measure or package of measures. The same research suggests that public subsidy could be used more effectively if financial viability issues were better understood and managed by local authorities. More effective application of public investment could release additional funds for social rented housing.

    —  Working with public sector landowners to identify a portfolio of brownfield land suitable for use to deliver affordable housing and which could be purchased with RHB funds to deliver affordable housing that meets higher standards of design and environmental sustainability.

    —  Maintaining a list of strategic sites which offer potential to deliver a significant increase in the supply of affordable housing.

    —  Investing £20 million per year in improving unfit private sector housing. Research for the RHB confirms that the private rented sector plays an important part in the provision of affordable housing for people who are vulnerable and/ or on low incomes. However, the condition of such housing stock gives cause for concern. Of 2,981,040 private sector dwellings in the South East, 166,465 private rented dwellings fail the Decent Home Standard. Of these, 47,703 are vulnerable households least able to improve the condition of their homes and most reliant on a complex network of advice and assistance from a range of providers.

    —  Considering how funds can be targeted most effectively to improve the condition of empty homes. The most recent (2004) validated returns from local authorities show that just over 32,000 homes (most of them privately owned) in the region had been vacant for 6 months or more. The overall level of empty homes in the South East represents 2.7% of the housing stock, lower than the 3% vacancy rate recognised as a necessary level for the housing market to function effectively. Work is progressing with the Empty Homes Agency to assist local authorities to reduce the long term vacancy figure and hence contribute to the supply of housing.

  10.  The Implementation Plan also emphasises the importance of aligning investment strategies at regional level and, most importantly, improving the alignment of the investment strategies of national agencies with regional priorities. The Board welcomed the proposals set out in the recent Housing Corporation consultation on Future Investment Approaches which offers continuity and innovation through approaches such as those described above.

  11.  These areas of work have the potential to deliver more affordable housing in a cost effective way but it is unlikely that these initiatives alone will bring provision up to the level identified in the draft South East Plan. The shortfall is particularly acute in the social rented sector. Additional public sector funding is likely to be the only solution to this problem.

  12.  The supply of new housing in the South East relies to a considerable extent on smaller sites. The identification of thresholds at a national level, replicated at a local level, limit the opportunity for smaller sites to make a contribution towards delivery of affordable housing. In addition, there are increasing concerns that the pressure for higher thresholds for affordable housing as part of Section 106 agreements creates a perverse incentive that encourages the construction of smaller units and flats rather than a better balance of housing size and type. This may have negative effects on the sustainability of communities. The Regional Assembly has commissioned work on the issue of size and type of housing being delivered; this will be available early in the New Year. We welcome the greater flexibility introduced by PPS3 but are concerned that the inclusion of a national indicative threshold could limit such flexibility in practice.

  13.  To conclude, regional evidence of the need for affordable housing and the region's ability to deliver a greater supply are clear. Through the RHB, significant funding has been made available for 2006-8 to increase the supply of rented housing and to improve conditions in the private rented sector. However it is clear that with the current level of resources available for the public sector it will not be possible to tackle the backlog of need for decent, affordable rented housing.

December 2006

Table 1


Type of affordable housing
South East
Plan target
Housing
Corporations
Affordable Housing
Development
Programme
Shortfall

Social rented
7,225
4,665
2,560
All others
2,890
2,070
820
Total
10,115
6,735
3,380

Note: Figures are on annual basis.


Table 2

INVESTMENT BY THE REGIONAL HOUSING BOARD (RHB) THROUGH THE HOUSING CORPORATION'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (AHDP) FOR 2006-08


Type of affordable housing
Units completed during 2004- 2006 programme
Units of accommodation in 2006-2008 programme
Cost £m

Social rented
5,806
9,330
502
Newbuild HomeBuy
(formerly Low Cost Home Ownership)
4,146
3,871
71
Other
1,823
269
5.6
Total
11,775
13,470
578.6

Note: Figures are for two years.


  [Note that the programme also included funding for HomeBuy Market Purchase for key workers/ first time buyers which made no addition to the existing stock).





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 21 May 2008