Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by The Lichfield and Hatherton Canals Restoration Trust

Reasons for having contact with British Waterways

  1.  L&HCRT has maintained regular contact with local waterways managers from its inception in 1988. In recent years our main contact has been with the manager of West Midlands Waterways. We have also worked directly with the Chief Executive. The relationship has always been friendly and supportive and is currently extremely positive. In times of difficulty the Trust has always turned to BW, usually to great effect. The Trust recognises that, in the longer term, major canal restoration projects are unlikely to reach completion within a realistic time frame, unless they have the support of BW, local authorities and, ultimately, government.

2.   What is being achieved with British Waterways

  The Trust has worked closely with British Waterways in a number of areas.

    (a)  The construction of an aqueduct over the M6 Toll Road and the redesign to navigable dimensions of culverts under M6 Toll. BW provided advice and, through the Waterways Trust, support with funding a major project at very short notice.

    (b)  Joining discussions with Staffordshire Highways to ensure that new road construction did not obstruct the restoration route of the Lichfield Canal 2006-2007. Also assistance with design work. Again, time was limited and the very active input of BW staff saved the day.

    (c)  Facilitating a feasibility study for the Hatherton Canal. BW handled the sourcing of providers and ultimately Ove Arup.

    (d)  Advising and supporting work to reinstate a road bridge over the Lichfield Canal. Land acquisition was complex and BW advice and support was required.

    (e)  Ongoing discussions on ways in which BW can assist the Trust. The Trust will identify areas in which BW can supply advice and support.

    (f)  The Hatherton Canal is partly in BW ownership requiring the Trust to work with BW when regular volunteer work parties are deployed. Health and Safety advice has been required and provided.

    (g)  Advice in specific areas such as purchase of property, development requirements and design of structures.

3.   The Nature of the Partnership

  The support of BW for the work of the restoration trust is a key ingredient in making progress. In addition to the items listed above being able to quote the positive involvement of BW carries considerable weight in discussions with local authorities, businesses and land owners.

4.   The Future

  While restoration organisation can, and have, achieved, a great deal as free-standing organisations the support of British Waterways becomes vital if the major projects are to be taken to completion within a reasonable timescale. Several of our major achievements could not have been made without very active BW support. The Trust has now reached a point where even greater input will be required as it moves from a mixture of crisis reaction and spot restoration projects to a more strategic level. We need to stress the value of the restored canals to the regeneration of the grossly underused waterways, to the north of Birmingham. The return of boats to these waterways will be of enormous value to areas which are suffering economic and social deprivation. We also need to show that our reopened waterways will ease pressure on areas of the Midlands canal network which are becoming seriously overcrowded and bring tourism to the heart of the Black Country. The support of BW is essential in support of the volunteers who need professional support and advice. We hope that the existing supportive relationship can be developed and carried to a higher level.

The Lichfield and Hatherton Canals Restoration Trust

March 2008






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 1 July 2008