Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Company of Proprietors of the Stroudwater Navigation

  This document is assembled in four parts in accordance with the Select Committee "Guide for Witnesses; written evidence" document—i.e. Summary, Brief Introduction, Factual Information; Recommendations for the Committee to consider.

1.  SUMMARY

  1.1  British Waterways have attempted to solve a short-term (albeit major) financial problem on their network at the expense of longer term, strategic gain to that network. In doing so, they do not appear to have had due regard to the national priorities for canal restoration, the issues of economic regeneration in the Stroud Valleys, or of their obligations contained in a property and operational Lease which they obtained from this Company for the express purpose of restoring the Stroudwater Navigation.

  1.2  The three recommendations listed in Section 4 of this submission are designed to address the principal points made in Clause 1.1 above, whilst permitting latitude for British Waterways to seek ways of overcoming the current financial crisis in a reasonable manner.

2.  INTRODUCTION

  2.1  I am the current Chairman of the Company of Proprietors of the Stroudwater Navigation. The Company was constituted by Act of Parliament in 1730, and has remained in existence since that date. In 1954, a further Act removed the duty on the Company to provide navigation on the canal known as the Stroudwater Navigation, and amended the framework within which the Company operates.

  2.2  The Company exists to manage the land embracing the Stroudwater Navigation canal; it has no employees and Directors are not paid, nor do they normally receive expenses. There are shareholders with 200 shares in the Company ( a figure laid down in the 1954 Act). The majority of those shares are held in trust "for the good of the people of Stroud and the surrounding area".

  2.3  The Company of Proprietors leased all its property to British Waterways in April 2005 for a period of 999 years, retaining the significant archive of the Company and its operation of the Canal. The specific purpose of that Lease is to enable the restoration of the Stroudwater Navigation, and the abutting Thames and Severn Canal, which together comprise the Cotswold Canals, and to maintain and operate that Canal.

3.  FACTUAL INFORMATION

  3.1  The Lease referred to in 2.3 above contains a Clause (3.2) which states;

    Either

    (3.2.1)  At any time prior to the commencement of any restoration;

    or

    (3.2.2)  If restoration of a Navigable Channel has not been achieved within 30 years of the date of this Agreement [April 2005] or such longer period as may be agreed between the two parties acting reasonably

    The Tenant [British Waterways] may serve notice to terminate this Lease as set out in Schedule 5 hereof

  Schedule 5 permits the Tenant to terminate the Lease prior to restoration being completed if, in its reasonable opinion, the provision of a navigable waterway is not feasible "due to unavailability of funding or other reasons beyond its immediate control".

  3.2  Restoration commenced in November 2007, removing 300m of infill and recreating one bridge. Therefore Clause 3.2.1 above does not apply.

  3.3  Clause 3.2.2 above specifies a period of 30 years for the achievement of a navigable channel. It is quite clear that, after only 3 years of the 30 year period, it is not possible to demonstrate that a navigable channel cannot be achieved. With regard to condition in Schedule 5 (in italic above) funding has been available up to January 28th 2008, and that the decision taken by the BW Board on that date was a step entirely within the immediate control of the Tenant. The combined effect, therefore, of Clause 3.2.2 and Schedule 5 is that British Waterways will retain the Lease.

  3.4  Another Clause contains the following requirement; Prior to the Restoration Date [completion of restoration] the Tenant will continue to take all reasonable steps to obtain third party funding, . . . . . . . . . . . ..

In order to abide by the terms of the Lease, it is difficult to see how British Waterways can withdraw from the Cotswold Canals Partnership.

  3.5  The Cotswold Canals are the top priority for canal restoration throughout the United Kingdom. This has been repeated identified as such by British Waterways in successive Annual Reports and in their document "Our Plan for the Future".

  3.6  The Aims for British Waterways, mandated by Government in BW's Framework document state the following key objectives;

    —  to maintain and develop our inland waterways in a sustainable manner so that they fulfil their full economic, social, and environmental potential

    —  promote and enable rural and urban regeneration

    —  maintain and enhance leisure, recreation, tourism, and educational opportunities for the general public.

  3.7  Government policy documents for Rural and Urban Regeneration, and the policies contained in "Waterways for Tomorrow" require British Waterways to maximize canal restoration to achieve the best possible regeneration. BW endorse this mandate in a recent Annual Report;

    "Along with our existing property and waterways, we work tirelessly with partners to help restore derelict waterways with an end aim to provide even further regeneration and public benefits.

    Canal restoration projects are often the most visible or tangible evidence of our wider cultural commitment to regeneration—a commitment that recognizes the increasingly valuable contribution that waterways make to the quality of local life today."

  3.8  The press release issued by British Waterways on 4th February 2008—without prior warning—announced their intention to withdraw from the Partnership. In the same statement, BW listed several waterway restorations with which they propose to proceed, even though these are of lesser strategic significance than the Cotswold Canals.

  3.9  The Cotswold Canals measure 57 km in total, and, when restoration is completed will form a key element of the national network.

  3.10  A length of 5 km of the Stroudwater Navigation constitutes 55% of the current Phase 1a project for which British Waterways, as lead Partner, obtained funding amounting to £37 million in total, on behalf of the Partnership for the dual purposes of canal restoration and economic regeneration. The base estimate for the engineering of the Phase 1a project totals £15.2 million.

  3.11  According to studies carried out by British Waterways, restoration of the Cotswold Canals Phase 1a is forecast to generate 620 jobs (Project Atlas 2005). The Cotswold Canals are of high heritage value and with strong community support and involvement.

  3.12  The reason given by British Waterways for withdrawing from the Partnership was due to a "one-off" financial problem with the Monmouthshire & Brecon Canal. It was stated that failure to address this problem would result in loss of an unspecified number of jobs and downturn in the local economy.

  3.13  We understand ("The Citizen", February 15th 2008) that opportunities for funding the repairs of the Monmouth & Brecon Canal may exist through freer borrowing powers which may become available to British Waterways and through suitable approaches to the Welsh Assembly.

4.  RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE SELECT COMMITTEE

  4.1  THAT British Waterways be directed not to withdraw from the Cotswold Canals Partnership—Reason ; there appears to be good reason, in the long term, for BW to retain a strong interest in this canal and, indeed, reason in the short term with regard to land ownership, technical standards and methods for restoration, through the provision of advice. Also there is a commitment within the British Waterways Lease with the Company of Proprietors to continue to seek funding for the restoration of the Stroudwater Navigation. [ 3.3,3.4, 3.5 & 3.6]

  4.2  THAT British Waterways be required to have proper regard for the agreed national priorities for restoration of canals. Reason: in reaching their decision, the Board of British Waterways appear to have disregarded currently adopted national programmes.[3.5 & 3.6, 3.7 & 3.8]

  4.3  THAT British Waterways be directed to seek sources of funding for the Monmouthshire & Brecon Canal repair work other than at the expense of the Cotswold Canals [Phase 1a]. Reason: The Cotswold Canals is a strategic link in the national canal network which would bring added value to that network, and also has a high return in terms of regeneration and value to the community. [3.5, 3.6, 3.11 & 3.12 taken together, & 3.13].

Neville C. Nelder

Chairman of the Company of Proprietors of the Stroudwater Navigation

March 2008






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 1 July 2008