Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

  1.  This memorandum updates the Committee on Defra's work to follow up agreed recommendations to the 2007 Inquiry into British Waterways ahead of its one-off evidence session to examine British Waterways' regeneration and restoration role.

FUTURE FUNDING/CSR SETTLEMENT

  2.  Grant funding for British Waterways of £56.624 million (plus £1.024 million towards the repayment of the capital of a National Fund Loan) in 2008-09 has been confirmed. We have maintained investment in the canal network at broadly flat cash which reflects Defra's commitment to the waterways and recognises the value of maintaining the integrity of the existing BW canal network for delivery of a wide range of public benefits including regeneration. This is the best that could be realistically achieved for the waterways within a tight spending review and competing priorities. We shall be finalising the position for 2009-10 and 2010-11 over the coming weeks.

DEFRA STRATEGIC STEER ON GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES FOR CSR PERIOD

  3.  Defra understands the importance of its role in sponsoring British Waterways as the custodian of the waterways network on behalf of Government, which delivers a wide range of public benefits including regeneration. Government acknowledges the good work British Waterways does in maintaining and improving the historic network for current use and future generations as well as its involvement in regenerating communities through both maintaining a vibrant canal network and developing its property adjacent to the waterside. We also recognise that British Waterways has to balance many different and competing priorities within finite resources. For this reason Defra has set out a Strategic Steer for British Waterways provides more detailed guidance on government priorities and in association with this has agreed a Deal to help strengthen our positive partnership with British Waterways (both attached) and these documents were developed in the last quarter of 2007, provisionally agreed in January 2008 and formally confirmed in February 2008.

  4.  The Steer advises that the three areas for Government priority in England and Wales are:

    (i)  maintaining the network in satisfactory order to deliver a wide range of associated public benefits;

    (ii)  achieving the shared Government/BW longer term vision of moving towards greater self sufficiency;

    (iii)  delivering a range of additional public benefits.

  5.  Government broadly favours (i) as the first and foremost priority. We have agreed with British Waterways that their main priority for the CSR period is to maintain a vibrant existing network to enable public benefits dependent on it, such as regeneration, to be delivered. Nevertheless we look to the British Waterways Board to strike a balance between the objectives, taking account of the costs and benefits, in deciding what British Waterways can reasonably achieve against all three.

  6.  Apart from the regenerative impact of a vibrant waterway network, Government fully recognises the potential of specific regeneration projects to contribute to government regional and urban economic development programmes as well as sometimes delivering commercial income to help support the network. Regeneration projects are mainly funded by external sources such as grants from RDAs and local authorities, lottery funds etc and involve many other partners. However, these grants are generally only towards the capital investment required and do not help meet the ongoing costs of maintaining any restored canals or new waterways which need to be met by British Waterways.

  7.  Given maintaining the existing network is our agreed main priority, Government supports British Waterways restoration activities, only where there are overriding benefits and where new cost streams do not compromise its ability to maintain the existing network in good order. Although restoration projects may bring regeneration benefits, there are ongoing costs to British Waterways which need to be carefully assessed for affordability. In addition, British Waterways often carries the risk of the project when it acts as project manager (in the case of the Cotswolds Canal Project, this had doubled to £6 million and could be more). Whether or not to engage in restoration projects is clearly a matter for the British Waterways Board in the light of the need for it to carefully assess the wide range of costs and benefits and alternatives together with existing pressures. Central government is not well placed to decide between restoration projects across the country or fund them through the grant to British Waterways which is to maintain the canal network. These projects benefit local communities and it is for regional and local funding providers to decide on priorities and what should be supported. Whilst some modest seedcorn funding might be appropriate, Government does not believe it is for British Waterways to carry the risk and responsibility for restoration projects—beneficiaries should share the burden.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL GROUP

  8.  Defra has met its commitment to set up an Interdepartmental Group to formalise and strengthen contact with other Government departments and make sure that the potential benefits of waterways are understood. The Group met for the first time last December and agreed its Terms of Reference [attached] and will meet again in the Spring. The Group also considered the Strategic Steer before it was agreed.

  9.  Going forward the Group will be involved in a new research project on the economic and social benefits of the waterways to help form a cohesive view of the ways in which the inland waterways contribute more widely to our objectives. Defra is in the process of commissioning the research with advice from experts—IWAC, AINA and British Waterways. The identification of the benefits and beneficiaries should help focus attention on most appropriate sources of funding for further support of inland waterways.

  10.  Further to a DfT study on which waterways are best suited to freight use (due to be published in late March), the Group will consider whether there is a need to set up an Industry/Government group to take forward how Government and industry might further encourage more businesses to move onto the waterways.

  11.  We are also intending to review Waterways for Tomorrow with other Government Departments over the next year. The Government's policies for inland waterways, as set out in Waterways for Tomorrow published in June 2000, encourage a modern, integrated and sustainable approach to their use. However, it needs updating to reflect new cross Government Public Service Agreements for the CSR period, including climate change and protection of the environment on which Defra leads.

DEFRA'S RELATIONSHIP WITH STAKEHOLDERS

  12.  Jonathan Shaw has made a number of visits to the waterways including to key regeneration projects in the Midlands, the Olympics, and Wood Wharf, the latter with the potential to generate significant commercial funding for the network in the future. He met a wide range of stakeholders last December in a constructive and useful meeting and another such forum is planned for the summer.

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DEFRA AND BW

  13.  British Waterways has a good relationship with Jonathan Shaw with regular contact every few months (in July, September, October, November and this month). His next BW visit planned is when he goes to see the Monmouthshire and Brecon Canal. He will meet the British Waterways Board on 19th March.

  14.  Defra has been working closely with British Waterways to agree the Strategic Steer and Deal and on its strategy for the longer term. Both Defra and British Waterways are now working to apply the Deal. In this, inter alia, Defra agrees not to seek to micromanage British Waterways and the British Waterways Board agrees to manage risk and be accountable for its decisions. The Chief Executive and Chair regularly meet Defra officials and the Shareholder Executive, including at Quarterly Shareholder Meetings, to go through British Waterways' business performance, plans, projects and risk so that Defra can have an effective engagement in British Waterways' business planning process.

BRITISH WATERWAYS STATUS REVIEW

  15.  We will consider carefully the outcome of British Waterways' Status Review into whether there are other structural models which might enable British Waterways to increase its commercial income for spending on the waterways.

DEFRA

March 2008



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 1 July 2008