Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Alison Cobb (FL 76)

A DISASTER TO COME: NOTES ON FLOODING IN BINSEY AND WEST OXFORD IN 2000, 2003, 2007

SUMMARY

  This submission examines the experience of recent flood events in West Oxford, centred on Port Meadow, the village of Binsey and adjacent river channels.

  It places the blame on the Environment Agency for failure to maintain river channels, failure to maintain the embankment of the main River Thames, and failure to broadcast accurate and timely information during the floods. Simple remedies are recommended.

INTRODUCTION: BINSEY AND WEST OXFORD

  1.  This submission is centred on the Thames floodplain, on the western edge of the city of Oxford. It describes some of the experiences of the village of Binsey, a small isolated rural hamlet in the centre of this floodplain (but within Oxford City), during the floods of December 2000, January 2003 and July 2007.

  2.  Only residents of Binsey can know what happens during severe floods because Binsey is cut off by one mile of flood water in all directions. Neither Environment Agency nor Oxford City officials can, or do, get to the village at these times.

  3.  Binsey, "Ben's Eyot" or island, lies between the river Thames to the East, and its old course the Seacourt Stream to the West, which branches off the Thames above Oxford, and rejoins it below the city. As it goes through Oxford, the Thames fragments into a number of smaller channels (Seacourt Stream, Castle Mill Stream, Bullstake Stream, Hinksey Stream). These are not tributaries: they leave the main channel and rejoin it a few miles downstream. They are an integral part of the Thames.

PORT MEADOW

  4.  There is a large lake, or area of flood water storage, called Port Meadow, about one mile N-S, and half a mile E-W, which when full stands about one metre above low lying parts of Oxford. Port Meadow is immediately to the east of the village of Binsey.

  5.  The natural reservoir of Port Meadow is enhanced by an embankment on the West side of the Thames, one metre high, thirty metres wide. In the recent floods, this has been overtopped. This overtopping worsened with each of the last three floods, and in at least ten places along Port Meadow the bank is eroded. In the last flood, water came over the bank for a length of 150 metres in one place.

  6.  The overtopping happens suddenly. An enormous volume of water cascades into the low lying floodplain around Binsey, and follows the lie of the land South into Botley and Osney, flooding several hundred houses this time. This is one reason why Oxford floods.

SUBSIDIARY CHANNELS

  7.  A series of 10 maps from 1792 to 1944 show a connecting stream between the Thames at the North end of Port Meadow (which is the last part to fill with flood water) to the Seacourt Stream. In early maps, it is simply named "Swift Ditch". In eight later maps, the point where it leaves Port Meadow is labelled "Overflow". Its course is often indicated with flow arrows. The map currently provided to flood wardens by the Environment Agency also distinguishes it, and no other nearby stream, with flow arrows.

  8.  Swift Ditch and the Seacourt Stream are now blocked with growing vegetation and fallen trees. The Seacourt Stream was visited by kayak during the height of the floods: the craft did not move, since the stream was not flowing, even though water was flowing strongly across the adjacent meadows. There were fallen willows every fifty metres or so at that point. Neither the old "overflow" of Swift Ditch, nor the natural drainage of the Seacourt Stream, is able to work properly.

THE ROLE OF THE ENVIRONMENT AGENCY

  9.  After each flood the residents of Binsey tell the Environment Agency what happened; which they cannot otherwise know because they cannot get into Binsey during the floods. After each event we have walked the embankment with representatives of the Agency. Each time they say this is bad, something needs to be done. But nothing is done.

  10.  The Environment Agency is shown, on its own maps, to have a "power" over the Seacourt Stream. It does not exercise this power. We have recently (8th September 2007) canoed its central reach between Wytham village and Duke Street, West Oxford, and twenty-two fallen willows, ashes and hawthorn trees lie across it, blocking it.

  11.  If Swift Ditch is not part of the Environment Agency's responsibility, surely it should be? In living memory it was always maintained and kept flowing by the Thames Conservancy. An overflow for Port Meadow would be a help in alleviating serious floods.

  12.  People with long memories claim that the flood regime for the last three floods has been different. Flood water used to flow West, towards the Seacourt Stream. In these last floods, as never before, the Thames overtopped its embankment. As the embankment erodes, this becomes more dangerous. We believe we may have a New Orleans situation here. There, the levees broke: the city flooded. Afterwards it was discovered that the authorities had known about the weakening levees, but had done nothing to safeguard them. We have shown and told the Environment Agency three times, after each flood, about the new overtopping and eroding of the Thames embankment. And they have done nothing. A larger area of Oxford floods each time. Next time it may be disaster big-time.

  13.  The Environment Agency is making no new flood wardens. It hopes instead to involve "the community" in flood warnings. The experience of one flood warden is that the tinny voice on the telephone announcing a severe flood event is no substitute for being telephoned or e-mailed by a known person telling you. As the flood waters are rising dangerously, "the community" will all be busy taking valuable stuff upstairs, ripping up the carpets, and so on. Only a volunteer flood warden, who knows it is his or her duty, gets on the telephone at that time and warns people, before dealing with their own disaster.

  14.  There has been great indignation in Oxford at the inaccuracy of the Environment Agency's warnings. At one point they said the peak flood would come at eleven o'clock that morning, sorry, four o'clock that afternoon, sorry, seven o'clock that evening, sorry, during the night, and they announced the next day that the level was going down. A stick stuck in a lawn in Binsey measured in inches (because inches are easier to read with binoculars than centimetres, though conversion is easy), showed in that afternoon when levels were supposed to be dropping, in fact the water level was rising one centimetre every hour and a half. This looked like a peak coming, and we told the Environment Agency, who said they would pass it on. When we heard no announcement, we e-mailed Radio Oxford (who deserve high praise for their up-to-date handling of news of the latest floods) and asked them to put out a warning, which they did. We were then telephoned by the Environment Agency, asking what we were doing spreading alarm and despondency? We were right, an hour later the highest flood level of all hit Botley and Osney.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  15.  We suggest that the money and the means be given to the Environment Agency, and that they be spurred into action, to deal with the weakening embankment along the West side of Port Meadow, and renew and maintain the ability of Swift Ditch and the Seacourt Stream to take the overflow.

  16.  We suggest that more voluntary flood wardens be appointed. Two other villages North of Oxford, Wytham and Wolvercote, with no flood wardens, had no warning and suffered severe flooding, and 39 sheep drowned in Wytham. We suggest that flood wardens, instead of being issued with unnecessary yellow jackets, be given a measured stick to push in somewhere where they can easily read it. The absolute depth of the water is not so important as the rate at which it is rising, and anyone watching a measured stick can tell that. Had Wytham and Wolvercote had flood wardens with measured sticks, the rate of rise of waters in these two villages, which are above Binsey, would have given much earlier, and much more accurate warnings than those of the Environment Agency. The Environment Agency takes its data from the locks, the worst place in which to measure flood depths, and has proved to be dangerously inaccurate.

Alison Cobb

Flood Warden for Binsey; Press Officer, Binsey Residents Association

August 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 7 May 2008