Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Ashchurch Parish Council (FL 82)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  In response to the Committee's invitation for written memoranda from interested parties on the issues raised by recent flooding in England and Wales and what steps public authorities should take to address them Ashchurch Parish Council would wish to make representation as follows:

  1.  The Protection of utilities needs to be investigated:

    a.  Severn Trent Water Authority need to make contingency plans to ensure the safeguarding of the water supply and its distribution.

    b.  Steps need to be in place to ensure the protection of Emergency services, hospitals, nursing homes, areas servicing vulnerable people, hospitals, schools etc.

  2.  Clear distinction needs to be made between flash and river flooding:

    a.  Flash Flooding:

    i.      Enhancing the standard for drainage.

    ii.      Expanding storm drain systems and alleviating overloaded sewerage systems should be investigated.

    iii.      Environment Agency Best Practice on sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) must be enforced on new developments

    iv.      Land must be retained for soakaways to reduce flash flooding (washland)

    v.      It is essential that methods are developed to keep sewerage out of homes and businesses.

    b.  River Flooding:

    i.      With the speed at which water is able to disperse being essential in controlling the depth of flood waters, a contingency measure is needed to improve downstream flow, perhaps consideration should be given to opening the Sharpness Canal

    ii.      Examination of obstructions placed in the path during recent years ie riverbed silting and the new Castlemeads Causeway.

    iii.      To the best of the Parish Council's knowledge there is no active water flow model in the South of Avon catchments and the River Severn North of Gloucester. These could be physical or computer generated.

  3.  The floods illustrated the weakness in contingency planning for identifying vulnerable people.

1.  INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

  Ashchurch Parish is located to the East of Tewkesbury in Gloucestershire. The Parish is a mixed community of rural villages and larger residential and business developments with 6,000 residents and 2,600 homes. No houses or businesses lie within the areas defined in the Environment Agency 1947 flood margin although to the West and North of the Parish farmland does lie within the flood plain. Two streams run through the Parish—Carrant Brook and Tirlebrook, these streams flood adjacent farmland after heavy rainfall or when the Tewkesbury flood plain is full. The only instance of buildings being flooded in the Parish prior to 2007 was recorded in April 1998 when a small number of houses adjacent to a culvert were flooded following heavy rainfall. Some local roads including the A46 and B4079 have flooded briefly due to flash flooding.

  In July 2007 the severity of the rainfall caused a very significant number of houses to be flooded—around 200 from the latest estimates. All bar 5 or so of these homes have not been flooded previously or even been considered to be under threat. To the best of the Parish Council's knowledge no more than 3 or 4 businesses suffered flood damage. Travel in the Parish came to a halt with all roads in and out of the area being impassable, including the M5 motorway which was flooded to a depth of 1 to 2 feet across all 3 lanes where it passes through the Parish. Once the flash flooding subsided the Parish was unaffected by the unprecedented level of flooding in the Severn and Avon river basins.

  Water supplies in the Parish were turned off on the morning of Monday 27 July and not restored until Tuesday 5 August. Bottled water was not available in the Parish until late on Tuesday 28 July and bowsers were not delivered until the afternoon of Thursday 30 July.

2.  INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION

  As the Committee will be well aware the pumping station at The Mythe, Tewkesbury was flooded when the Rivers Severn and Avon rose above 1947 flood levels. Similarly, the power grid switching station in Gloucester would have been inundated without the superhuman efforts of the emergency and armed forces.

  The fact that 2 critical infrastructure components serving up to 500,000 people proved to be single points of failure and that the population of Gloucestershire was just an inch or so of flood water away from mass evacuation means that:

    a.  It is both urgent and essential that the appropriate agencies bring in the necessary protection for these critical services.

    b.  Disaster recovery plans are made and implemented.

    c.  While these are in progress, and it is recognised that they may take a considerable time to implement, emergency plans must be made following public consultation and then publicised so that the local population are informed.

    d.  As part of the contingency planning process steps need to be in place to ensure the protection of Emergency services including hospitals, nursing homes, areas servicing vulnerable people, hospitals, schools etc.

3.  RECOGNITION OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FLASH AND RIVER FLOODING

  The flooding resulting from the extreme weather conditions in July had two components—local flash flooding and river valley flooding. A clear distinction needs to be made between these events when planning remedial measures.

    a.  Flash Flooding—this can only be alleviated by having sufficient washland and permeable surfaces for water to drain naturally supplemented by a drainage system capable of clearing surface water rapidly:

    i.      Enhancing the standard for drainage Environment Agency standards must be revised to recognise the possibility that the volume of water the drainage system must handle is significantly greater than current best practice recommends.

    ii.      Expanding storm drain systems and alleviating overloaded sewerage systems should be investigated Investment must be made in updating and expanding the storm drain and sewerage systems including installing storm drains where the sewerage system currently carries both effluent and drainage water.

    iii.      Environment Agency Best Practice on sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) must be enforced on new developments. The Parish Council has had a policy for at least five years that all new developments should meet Environment Agency Best Practice on sustainable urban drainage (SUDS) but unfortunately the Planning Authority has not had the power to enforce this on developers and land owners (even the Environment Agency themselves when they carried out an extension to the office's car park).

    iv.      Land must retained for soakaways to reduce flash flooding (washland). Recognition must be given in the planning system for the vital role washland plays in drainage and water management.

    v.      It is essential that methods are developed to keep sewerage out of homes and businesses. The health risks and the level of damage to homes and businesses is exacerbated by the fact that sewerage escapes into the general flood waters. This is completely unacceptable in a modern society.

    b.  River Flooding—while the flooding in the main Tewkesbury flood plain does not have a direct impact on our Parish other than causing our waterways backing up we would still wish to make the following general observations:

    i.      With the speed at which water is able to disperse being essential in controlling the depth of flood waters, a contingency measure is needed to improve downstream flow, perhaps consideration should be given to opening the Sharpness Canal.

    ii.      Examination of obstructions placed in the path during recent years ie riverbed silting and the new Castlemeads Causeway.

    iii.      To the best of the Parish Council's knowledge there is no active water flow model in the South of Avon catchments and the River Severn North of Gloucester. These could be physical or computer generated.

4.  IDENTIFYING THE VULNERABLE

  The floods illustrated the weakness in contingency planning for identifying vulnerable people. In response to the state of emergency in the Parish, members were happy to form an informal emergency committee to co-ordinate water distribution, volunteer activity etc but it became immediately obvious that we could not prioritise support for local people in relation to need or to identify the especially vulnerable. This problem must be fed into the emergency planning system so that the responsible authorities (e.g. Social Services) can use local volunteers and community groups to help them reach those who need help most.

Ashchurch Parish Council

September 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 7 May 2008