Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Written Evidence


Submission from Hengride Permal, Chair, Chagos Islands Community Association

  1.  My name is Hengride Permal. I am the Chair of the Chagos Islands Community Association which represents some 2,000 Chagossians. Some of them live in Manchester and London, but the vast majority are living in Crawley. Out of these 2,000, a very small number of around 50 are babies who were born in the United Kingdom. Around 200 are elderly residents who were born in the Chagos Islands. The remainder were born in Mauritius and came to the UK because they were desperately seeking a better life and their families were suffering in the slums of Mauritius.

  2.  We began to arrive in Crawley in May or June 2002 when we started to receive full British passports. Once here, most of us spent days sleeping in Gatwick Airport, then spent a certain amount of time in hostel accommodation in Horley, then returned to Crawley where we had to seek private lodgings. The council did not consider that it had the responsibility to house us and we had to struggle in order to gain access to council housing.

  One of our members was only given a council house after he fell into the clutches of a private racketeer landlord, who assaulted him and beat him up and only then did the council move to provide him with accommodation.

  We had a 24-hour demonstration outside Crawley Council Offices throughout the winter months of 2005-06 to insist on our right to council housing and to demand access to the Jobseekers Allowance and to other benefits. These were denied to us, despite the fact that we had full British passports. To this day, we are still involved in struggles to gain access to the Jobseekers Alliance and to the Old Aged Pension, with elderly people who are entitled to it, still being denied.

  We are also suffering from our families being spilt up, with husbands living in Crawley and wives and children still in Mauritius and vice versa. Despite the fact that we are all British subjects, the conditions on which we were given British passports mean that some family members are admitted and others aren't. This causes a real trauma. It is possible to get long stay visas, but these cost nearly a thousand pounds which Chagossians do not have. Even then, when a family has been temporarily united through a long-term visa, big problems arise. We have a case currently where the father and his children, who came to stay with the mother in Crawley, on a long term visa, has been told that he has failed a Citizenship English test and is liable to be returned because of this to Mauritius with his children unless he is able to purchase a new visa to restart his stay here. There is no other word for this but torture. The family are distraught and fearful about what is to happen to them.

  In our opinion, this is no way to treat a people that have already been evicted from their homes and saw their animals being killed and their actual housing being demolished as they were removed from Diego Garcia and taken to Mauritius, never to return, as we were told. This is also not the way that people from other overseas British territories are being treated, such as from Monserrat and the Falklands.

  The British people are tolerant and have welcomed us, but there have been a number of instances of racist attacks on people and people's houses creating an atmosphere of fear, for which, of course, only a tiny minority are responsible.

  We come from a tropical island where you never get cold, where there is never a lack of food supply, either from the ocean or from the land, and where there were very few troubles and stresses. We find it very difficult to live in a completely urban environment and also in a climate that is cold and damp and we find difficult, leading to all kinds of illnesses, colds, chills, general aches and pains, which have blighted our stay here, especially for the elderly, who spend their days dreaming about returning home.

  Our community does look for work and many of us are working. But unfortunately it is in the lowest-paid jobs, with very little prospects. Also, our native language is Creole French. Many of us do not speak English and they have to be represented in dealing with problems, such as attempts to gain access to the Jobseekers Allowance and access to council housing, and problems with visas.

  So it is wrong to accept the picture that is being made that we are a community that is fully integrated into Britain, more or less British, and that has no real connection or desire to return to our homes. We all want to return to our homes. We all want to return to the Chagos Islands and to the life that our parents once had and which we all dream about.

  3.  We do not accept that there is a group of Chagossians who are more entitled to return to their homes than the rest of the Chagossian community, which is scattered in the UK, the Seychelles, Mauritius and other countries. We are all suffering. We all have the right to return and we all represent the same generations.

  4.  We are very disturbed that it seems to us that we are being by-passed. Nobody has ever informed us of the establishment of a resettlement team. It was news to us that a resettlement plan for some Chagossians would be launched in the House of Lords next month. We have never seen this resettlement plan. Nobody has consulted us about it. In our opinion we have the right to return, we have the right to draw up, with the rest of the Chagossian community, a resettlement plan and be represented on a negotiating team. This cannot be done for us or without us. This is why we would like to give face-to-face evidence on these issues to your Foreign Affairs Committee.

  We are very, very appreciative of the legal work that Richard Gifford from Sheridan's Solicitors has done to advance the cause of the Chagossian people. However, he cannot negotiate either on behalf of us or without us. The Chagossian community must have its own negotiating team. I would like to repeat that no section of the Chagossian community has a monopoly of the right to return, we all have it.

  The same is the case with the question of which Islands are to be resettled. We have the right as a community to decide on this. We do have the right of self-determination and I think that you will, and the British government will, recognise this right. It is now agreed that removing us from our homes was illegal. It follows from this that the establishment of the huge base on Diego Garcia was illegal. We cannot accept that since this illegal action is an established fact that we cannot return to Diego Garcia, from which the vast majority of us came from. In our opinion the United States of America must be asked to remove its base.

  5.  On the question of compensation, in our opinion the amount of compensation that has been paid up until now it pitiable. Two and a half thousand pounds is no compensation for what we have been through.

  However, many of us have never received any compensation and we would like your Foreign Affairs Committee and the British government to investigate what happened to the amount of money that was on offer as compensation. As far as we are concerned, we have the right to return and we have the right to a proper amount of compensation, to be negotiated, for what the Chagossian people have suffered.

  6.  We are prepared to discuss the issue of a phased return to our homes, but all have the right to return, not a limited 1,000, and the planning must be for a full return of the Chagossian people, with all of the different Chagossian groups represented in the different phases of this return.

  We wish to see self-determination for the Chagossian people. We want to be able to elect a Chagossian administration to run the Chagos islands so that we will never be tricked out of our homes again, although of course we are not opposed in any way to being members of the Commonwealth.

  Once again, I would like to thank you being able to make a written submission to you and we are looking forward to being able to appear before your committee to discuss the issues that have arisen.

  We would just like to re-emphasise that the Chagossians must decide who will negotiate for them, that all the Chagossian communities must draw up the plans for resettlement (and in this context we would appreciate it if you could see that we receive a copy of the current resettlement plan), and that all Chagossians must have the right to return with adequate compensation for their 40 years of suffering, if the terrible wrong that was done to us is to be really righted.

12 February 2008





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 6 July 2008