Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Written Evidence


Submission from Chedmond Browne, Former Member of Parliament and Spokesperson, Free Montserrat United Movement

BRIEF INTRODUCTION

  An organisation dedicated to seeing the Colony of Montserrat eventually attain its fundamental Right to Govern Itself.

  Representative to the United Nations Decolonisation Committee.

    (a)  Representing the government of Montserrat.

    (b)  Representing civil society.

  Member of the Drafting Committee on Montserrat Constitutional Review. (did not sign the draft).

  Chairman of the Select Committee of the House on recommendations to the Legislative Council.

  Representative of the House sitting in negotiations with the FCO team during my time as an MP.

  To the Committee I give my thoughts as briefly as I can, with the hope that you the Members will incorporate them into your eventual conclusions.

  1.  From the outset, it would appear to me, that the Committee is seeking to justify the process, that has concluded in some colonies, and still taking place in other colonies.

  2.  I note with interest, that the Committee held oral evidence sessions. however, I don't recall any such session being held in Montserrat.

  3.  It would seem to me that the people of the colonies involved would have been one of the target groups for oral sessions.

  4.  I would draw attention to the Committee to the United Nations Special Committees Resolution of 2007.

  In these recommendations to the General Assembly, they stated.

    1.  There is a direct linkage between Self Determination and Human Rights.

    2.  Clarification on the fact that internal constitutional reviews taking place were not designed to upgrade the present political status of those territories.

  5.  Overseas Territories Report Vol VI, 3 July 2007.

Headlines: UK TO EXTEND CONTROL OVER COLONIES

  In a major shift with its relations with its overseas territories the United Kingdom has announced its intention of seeking to extend its control over the 14 colonies under its administration. This new position is contained in a document recently sent to the Governors of the territories ...

  Overseas Territories Report & Overseas Territories Review are publications of Caribbean Information Services ltd. Box 75853, Washington, DC, 20013.

Reprinted from the Bermudanet Workers news.

  6.  In the colony of Anguilla the response from Civil Society basically follows the same thought process. As did their reports from experts and Civil Society to the UN Decolonisation Committee.

  7.  The numerous papers and reports given to the UN Decolonisation Committee in 2001, 2003, 2005, 2007 by the UK' remaining colonies all state clearly that the Constitutional Review process does not reflect those clauses in the 1999 White Paper, that speak to Partnership and the Hopes Visions and Aspirations of the People of the remaining colonies.

  8.  The UK Government has chosen to ignore the voice of the People in pursuit of its own policies.

  The people of the remaining Colonies basic Human Rights are being trampled upon, initially very quietly, but now extremely openly.

  Where in the Committees inquiries? Is there a query as to the position of the FCO in its approach and policy?

  9.  Will the Committee justify what has taken place, and what is still taking place in colonies like Montserrat and Anguilla who are still holding out despite the pressures being applied. The hopes visions and aspirations of the people of the remaining colonies were the operative words in the UK's 1999 White Paper.

  If the Committee can look into whether the Hopes Visions and Aspirations of the People of Montserrat have been addressed, if the Committee can look into the abandonment of one of the basic tenets of the Human Rights charter.

  "The right of a People to be governed by the representatives they elect".

  10.  If the Committee can look into the approach and position taken by the FCO negotiating team that they " will not" I reiterate, will not discuss, consider or debate in any fashion certain basic and fundamental rights of a People to move in a direction that eventually brings them to a Self governing state.

  If the Committee can look into and justify the UK's government open position, that it no longer has to pay any attention the UN Committee on Decolonisation, that it has the right to dictate to its remaining colonies its position despite their protestations.

  The UK is after all an Administering Power. The UK does not own Montserrat. It has been given a responsibility to bring Montserrat to a Self Governing state.

  However, it would appear, that the UK has now taken the position that it not only owns Montserrat, but it also has the Right to dictate to Montserrat the direction it should take.

  Is this a position that the Foreign Affairs agrees with or wants to justify?

  11.  If the Committee can look into the fact that the Government and People of Montserrat have not had any outside advice from any credible International Body on Constitutional review and reform.

  If the Committee can look into and justify the in house methodology of the FCO negotiating team and their single minded approach to accomplishing their agenda at the expense of their "Partnership's" Rights, Hopes, Visions and Aspirations.

  Where is the transparency? A key operative word in UK policy. Is it not applicable to this process also?

  12.  If the Committee can accept without question or query the UN Decolonisation's Committee Report that states clearly the UK constitutional exercise was not designed to upgrade the colonies.

  That statement I might add directly contradicts the UK 1999 White Paper position which also says it would negotiate with its remaining colonies in an atmosphere of Partnership to attain the Hopes, Visions and Aspirations of the People.

  13.  Here is hoping that the Foreign Affairs Committee, pays some attention to my response, but not only mine.

  Not all of the remaining colonies want to be tied to the UK forever.

  Montserrat in particular is tied because of an ongoing challenge from the forces of Nature.

  In many instances because of UK policy mostly controlled through DFID economic pressures that challenge has turned into not only a natural one but a man made one that allows, once again UK policy of a vision for itself to be imposed upon the People of Montserrat. Well, I think you get my point.

  So, I will end my brief. I am open and ready to interact and communicate with the Foreign Affairs Committee on this issue and any other issues that relate to Montserrat.

31 January 2008





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 6 July 2008