Select Committee on International Development Ninth Report


5  Conclusion

75.  The Paris Declaration has had some impact on how both donors and developing countries approach development assistance. DFID has worked to fulfil its commitments under the Declaration. Progress globally, however, has been patchier. The OECD has told us that the conclusions of its most recent survey on implementation of the Declaration are "alarming in respect of substantive progress".[105] The Accra High Level Forum is an opportunity to shine a spotlight on this lack of progress and to hold those who have signed the Declaration, particularly donors, to account.

76.  Efforts to make aid more effective depend on credible evidence which links particular actions with better development outcomes. Large pieces of this evidential base are missing. Assertions, for example, that coordination delivers lower transactions costs or that ownership translates to more effective aid are plausible but not thoroughly proven. DFID must ensure that it is not simply joining a well-meaning consensus on aid effectiveness but has done the research to prove to us and, equally importantly, the taxpayer that its approach delivers more effective aid.

77.  The terms of the aid effectiveness debate and the focus on greater ownership of the development process by developing countries and on greater donor coordination are unlikely to change despite the slow progress against the Paris targets. Joint working between DFID and other donors, and indeed DFID working through other donors, is likely to become a more frequent occurrence and this has implications for the scrutiny performed by this Committee. DFID must work proactively to ensure that we have meaningful oversight of all of its work, however the budget is spent.


105   Ev 82 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 17 July 2008