Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by The Senlis Council

INTRODUCTION

  1.  The Senlis Council is an international policy think tank established by The Network of European Foundations, with country offices in Kabul, London, Ottawa, Rio de Janeiro, Paris and Brussels. The Council's work encompasses security, development and counter-narcotics policies, and aims to provide innovative analysis and proposals within these areas.

  2.  The Senlis Council's extensive programme in Afghanistan focuses on global policy development. The Council has been conducting in-depth field research in the country for the past three years, investigating the relationships between counter-narcotics, military and development policies, and their impact on reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan. Senlis Afghanistan has field offices in the cities of Lashkar Gah and Kandahar.

THE URGENCY TO IMPLEMENT A COHERENT CAMPAIGN IN AFGHANISTAN

  3.  Notwithstanding six years of strong international presence and commitment, Afghanistan is presently faced with a multifaceted crisis: southern provinces are ravaged by extreme poverty and the rise of insurgency. At the centre of this nexus lies the opium crisis with illegal production reaching unprecedented levels, as indicated by the United Nations Office on Drugs Control (UNODC) in its latest report of August 2007. The link between opium production and increasing insecurity is of grave concern.

  4.  In southern Afghanistan's insecure environment, essential food and development aid fails to reach the population in need. In turn, this has exacerbated the humanitarian crisis and fuelled public disillusionment towards the UK's military and counter-narcotics operations. Critically, the ineffectiveness to address the population's basic needs has facilitated the rise of a grassroots insurgency. Afghans living in the numerous refugee camps under appalling conditions, often as a result of aerial bombing campaigns, are being recruited by the insurgents. The south of Afghanistan is becoming a recruitment camp for the Taliban, with a deep pool of young, unemployed men willing to fight primarily for economic rather than ideological reasons.

  5.  The reconstruction mission in Afghanistan is at a crossroads: unbalanced, incoherent and ineffective development, military and counter-narcotics policies severely jeopardise the mission. We are now entering a vicious cycle that can only be broken by a radical overhaul of policy. The ever-swelling number of rank-and-file Taliban is leading to fiercer resistance against Western forces in the south; there are not enough troops to face the level of hostility effectively, and as military fatalities rise, so aerial bombings increase. This in turn leads to more civilian deaths, which fuel anger and prompt membership of the Taliban, thereby perpetuating the cycle.

  6.   Recommendation: It is imperative that the UK Government takes on a coherent campaign reconciling development, counter-insurgency and counter-narcotics efforts. A complete package of clear objectives and diverse development-based interventions complemented by military efforts is urgently required. The provision of effective development and essential aid, and a positive counter-narcotics strategy must be an immediate response to Afghanistan's emergency.

ADDRESSING THE NEEDS OF THE REAL AFGHANISTAN: PAVING THE WAY FOR AN EFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

  7.  The Senlis Council commends the UK and Department for International Development (DFID) on its significant contribution to the reconstruction of Afghanistan. In particular, its commitment to spending £330 million on reconstruction and development in the country by March 2009. It is crucial that a significant portion of this money goes towards desperately required food aid and healthcare, particularly in the conflict-ravaged southern provinces.

  8.  The reality in southern Afghanistan is one of escalating violence and poverty. The Senlis Council has conducted extensive field research across the numerous and often overlooked refugee camps in Helmand and Kandahar provinces, revealing the true extent of hunger and despair in the region. Our field research has indicated that the current system of food aid is failing to address even the minimum needs of the hundreds of thousands of victims of violent conflict and drought.

  9.  Should the UK fail to deliver the desperately needed humanitarian and development assistance across Afghanistan, stabilisation efforts in the country are likely to fail. The Taliban are capitalising on this development vacuum in southern Afghanistan, gaining psychological control of the local population through coercive means, and increasing its attractiveness as a potential source of income for ordinary Afghans deprived of alternative ways in which to provide for their families.

  10.  In order to regain local confidence and support, the British effort in southern Afghanistan needs to be closely associated with development interventions, enabling immediate aid to reach the population and promoting initiatives to bring economic development and stability in the short and medium-term. British forces in Helmand province are doing a commendable job in an increasingly hostile environment and could potentially support DFID's activities in those areas, helping to identify the Afghan population most in need, securing the areas and assisting with aid delivery. Importantly, a strong presence and effective provision of essential aid would help support the military operations.

  11.   Recommendation: A coherent development policy that addresses the real and immediate needs of the Afghan people must be put in place. This calls for an immediate and widespread distribution of food aid and healthcare until medium-term development can be provided in a sustainable manner.

OPIUM: IMMEDIATE RESPONSE IN REBUILDING AFGHANISTAN'S ECONOMY

  12.  Despite the scale of poppy eradication operations in 2007, according to UNODC figures opium production has reached 193,000ha, representing a 17% increase compared to 2006. In the absence of sustainable alternative livelihoods, opium remains the only source of livelihood for 14.3% of the entire Afghan population.

  13.  Based on extensive field research, The Senlis Council has developed a village-based Poppy for Medicine model for Afghanistan as a means of bringing illegal poppy cultivation under control in an immediate yet sustainable manner. The Poppy for Medicine (P4M) project is an integrated counter-narcotics and counter-insurgency initiative that seeks to introduce village-based development projects in rural Afghan communities to boost employment and rural development, stimulate rural diversification and connect Afghan poppy cultivation with those in need of essential painkilling medicines. P4M projects link Afghanistan's two most valuable resources—poppy cultivation and strong local governance and control systems—through the controlled cultivation of poppy for the local production of pharmaceutical-grade morphine.

  14.  A Poll conducted in the UK on P4M reveals vast support for our proposals on both sides of the Atlantic. Although all four of the states polled—the UK, America, Canada and The Netherlands—were in favour of pilot P4M projects in Afghanistan, UK opinion was particularly firm in its support of such an initiative. An overwhelming 86% supported P4M projects, and moreover, 80% stated that they would use Afghan produced morphine. There was also a significant disapproval of chemical eradication of opium poppy, with 74% of those polled expressing their opposition to this policy.

  15.   Recommendation: The Senlis Council urges DFID to support its call for the immediate implementation of two pilot P4M projects in two pre-identified villages in southern Afghanistan.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 14 February 2008