Select Committee on International Development Written Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by the Department for International Development

PROFORMA FOR STAND ALONE MULTILATERAL FINANCING DECISIONS

  The following issues should be taken into account in preparing financing submissions at Director level[1] and above:

    1.  What is the agreed vision/role for the organisation in the overall international architecture?

    2.  What is its relevance for poverty reduction (MDGs) or humanitarian assistance?

    3.  What is our current strategy for financial support?

    4.  What is the specific case for additional financing at this point:

    —  What specific outcomes would the extra financing deliver?

    —  Why is it a priority now?

    —  What would be the implications for the agency of not providing this financing?

    —  What are the burden sharing implications (what do we know about other donors financing plans)?

    —  Are specific political issues involved?

    —  (where relevant) What has changed since the aid framework allocation ?

    —  What are the implications for International Division's other multilateral financing arrangements?

    5.  What is the agency's record in terms of improving its organisational effectiveness?

    6.  Status report on IS Process:

    —  What is the current status of the IS?

    —  What progress has the organisation made towards agreed targets?

    7.  Are there any risks (fiduciary and other) to this financing?








1   All new multilateral finance decisions which add to more than £20 million on a three year basis (or when there are key strategic issues) need to be submitted (through the Director) to the Secretary of State and follow Blue Book guidance on spending proposals over £20 million (including seeking approval of the PFO). Formally the Blue Book still requires project concept notes for spend above £20 million to be circulated to DC members but we are seeking clarification of this and assume-for now-that the existence of the MFAC replaces this requirement. The Director will decide, on a rolling basis, which proposals should be brought to the Committee either on a paper or meeting basis. Whether or not the Director decides that projects should be discussed by the MFAC he would normally wish to see all new proposals for core financing even when the amounts (on a three year rolling basis) are below delegated authority for UK HODs (currently set at £7.5 million). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 5 March 2008