Select Committee on Procedure First Report


Summary


Last year the House endorsed our proposal to work up an e-petitioning system for the House of Commons. Experience elsewhere, notably on the No. 10 Downing Street website, has demonstrated high levels of public interest and engagement. Historically and constitutionally the House of Commons is the place to which petitions should properly be presented. It is time for the House to reclaim that role in the internet age.

E-petitioning offers a simple, effective and transparent way for the public to tell the House and its Members about what matters to them and to indicate the levels of support for their concerns. And with e-petitioning, the House could respond to those petitioners telling them about the progress of their petitions and even about what else the House might be doing on the same issue.

Our proposed scheme retains the direct involvement of constituency Members of Parliament in the petitions procedure. This is a strength of our current procedures; it provides petitioners with advice and support and a route to follow up the petition after its presentation. We propose that:

  • E-petitions are submitted via the parliamentary website
  • If they comply with the House's rules, the petitioner's constituency MP will be asked to act as facilitator
  • The e-petition is then posted on the parliamentary website for a set period. Others may add their names to it
  • At the end of the period, it is closed. Members will be able to indicate support for it
  • It is then presented to the House, either electronically or on the floor
  • Petitioners and signatories may opt in to receive updates on the progress of the e-petition and/or up to two emails from their constituency MP
  • E-petitions will be printed in Hansard and sent to select committees and may be considered by them
  • The Government will normally be expected to reply within two months of presentation
  • On three occasions each year, certain e-petitions will be debated by the House of Commons in Westminster Hall.

Setting up an e-petitions scheme is not without risks. We are not aware of any other existing scheme of comparable scale and ambition. Its successful implementation will require new ways of working and novel forms of governance. If it is to attract the widest possible range of users, it will need to be able to adapt and respond to what they expect of it. It must be able to cope with potentially high and unpredictable levels of demand.

If e-petitioning is to be successful it must deliver outcomes which meet public expectations. Partly that will involve explaining to the public what those expectations should be. But we also recognise that the introduction of e-petitioning will itself raise expectations and that the House will need to show that it is willing and able to respond.

E-petitioning has the potential to open up the House's proceedings in new and to some extent unpredictable ways. Overall it could make a major contribution to the House's strategic objective to 'make itself more accessible, to make it easier for people to understand the work of Parliament and do more to communicate its activity to the general public.'


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 6 April 2008