Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 40-59)

HM TREASURY & PARTNERSHIPS UK

6 FEBRUARY 2008

  Q40  Nigel Griffiths: This is not about proselytising for PFI: it is making sure that the right guidance is being implemented and what sanctions you have when it is not.

  Mr Kingman: If you are the Department of Health or the Home Office or whatever, you have an accounting officer, you have procurement people, that is quite properly the affair of the department. What we do actively do is go in, with the help of OGC, and look at the procurement capability in departments and where that is weak we seek to persuade the department to strengthen it.

  Q41  Nigel Griffiths: What about the capability in schools? The Report mentions that one in six PFI schools do not have enough staff for their PFI contracts and a third of PFI hospitals do not have enough staff to manage the contract properly. Is that not an indictment?

  Mr Kingman: As I said earlier to the Chairman, it is essential that people who are running complex contracts have the capability necessary to do that.

  Q42  Nigel Griffiths: But that is another failure then, because a third do not in hospitals and a sixth do not in schools.

  Mr Kingman: It would be a good thing if those projects had stronger capability.

  Q43  Nigel Griffiths: We are in agreement then. It would be a good thing but it is your job to make sure it is done. What are you doing to make sure it is being done?

  Mr Kingman: It is certainly our job to try to make sure it is done but it would be wrong for the Treasury to convince itself that it can somehow take over procurement. The Government spends hundreds of billions a year on procuring services. The Treasury is a small institution, we set policy and we try to strengthen capability but we cannot run everyone's procurement for them.

  Q44  Nigel Griffiths: We are not asking that. What we are asking is why in every PFI hospital—and we are dealing generally with many hundreds of millions of pounds in a PFI hospital case—it is not a requirement that there is someone there to manage PFI contracts properly? Why is it left to local health authorities, or PCTs or whomever?

  Mr Kingman: We have guidance, as James said earlier, that encourages people to have a full-time contract manager but hospitals take their own decisions, that is how it works.

  Q45  Nigel Griffiths: You are responsible and so are we for the use of public money and that is frankly not a good enough statement to say they take their own decisions. If they decide to waste money, we presumably rely on someone in Whitehall to try to avoid that.

  Mr Kingman: We certainly do have a clear role which is about challenge and I believe we discharge that.

  Q46  Nigel Griffiths: Is it not desirable to convert guidance into mandatory practice?

  Mr Kingman: It can be and in some cases we do. Going back to the example about competition, we have a very strong presumption in favour of competition, it is widely understood, it is enshrined in our guidance, it is enshrined in Managing Public Money and accounting officers fully understand that. I am not going to say that I know that there are no circumstances in which it is inappropriate not to have a competition because there are legitimate circumstances in which it is.

  Q47  Nigel Griffiths: I am sure that is right. The case that was given of the East Riding school that is in here seems to be a good case. I am just wondering why people are allowed to get away with sloppier practice. Why are they not required to adopt best practice, rather than too often ignoring guidance which is voluntary?

  Mr Stewart: On your specific point on contract managers the important thing is that they are put in place before the contract is actually finalised. So there is now very clear guidance in SOPC4 that says up to six months before a contract is signed, please put in place your contract manager.

  Q48  Nigel Griffiths: That is a nice way of putting it. Why do you not say: "You must put in place a contract manager"?

  Mr Stewart: It is not my decision to say "must".

  Q49  Nigel Griffiths: Who should be saying that they must then?

  Mr Stewart: Speaking for PUK, one of the things that we struggle with at the moment is continually the balance between the role of the centre and the responsibilities of the local procurement body. That balance has shifted over the last 20 years, but currently absolute responsibility and accountability for decisions sits with local bodies. We understand that, we tell them what we feel is right, we spread best practice, we give them guidance, we give them help.

  Q50  Nigel Griffiths: Because we provide the money from here, I think certain things should be a requirement and that is one. That does not seem an unfair assumption, does it?

  Mr Stewart: That is a matter of government policy that is not for me to comment on.

  Mr Kingman: It depends what kind of body you are talking about.

  Q51  Nigel Griffiths: Staying with the example that we have just been given.

  Mr Kingman: I assume that you would not contend, for example, that we should have the power to require local authorities to do things.

  Q52  Nigel Griffiths: Oh, I think so. If you are spending £50 million pounds on a school or something like that, there should be a certain requirement that you have a contract manager, otherwise you get what we are getting at the moment and that is that in one sixth of the cases they do not.

  Mr Kingman: There is local democracy; we do not have the authority to require local authorities to do things.

  Q53  Nigel Griffiths: Well you require local authorities to go for the PFI option.

  Mr Kingman: No.

  Q54 Nigel Griffiths: Yes, if they want the funding—and I have to say I am a supporter of PFI—and you are entitled, since the money is coming from you, to say whether the terms are reasonable. It seems to me to be reasonable to have a contract manager.

  Mr Stewart: There are two issues that local authorities and hospital trusts have to deal with. These are long-term contracts and they rely on good partnerships between the public sector and the private sector, that means good relationships. A continual challenge is to retain people in those contract management jobs for a reasonable period of time. When I say "a reasonable period of time", I think five years plus is a reasonable period of time. That is a challenge in this environment. The other challenge they have is that the workload of the management contract does go up and down, so by the time of benchmarking, market testing, which this Committee talked about a few months ago, obviously more resource is required and if there is a big variation, again they have to supplement their resources.

  Q55  Nigel Griffiths: You have thrown up something interesting there. Obviously, yes, it can be difficult getting people up to capacity on projects that they have never dealt with before. Why then do we not have a central group of people, peripatetic, who have the expertise that can go in?

  Mr Stewart: We do have those central groups. For the larger departments there are private finance units, so, for instance, the Department of Health has a private finance unit which is probably a first port of call for support in those situations and if more specialist expertise is needed, then someone like PUK might also offer support. One of the primary roles of the helpdesk is not actually to provide the help, but often to identify the source of where that help might be.

  Q56  Nigel Griffiths: Do you have a list of contract managers that the helpdesk can suggest people hire?

  Mr Stewart: We do have knowledge of all the contract managers. As you say, we might often say: "Why don't you talk to so and so who has just been doing this before".

  Q57  Nigel Griffiths: Can they hire that person?

  Mr Stewart: Normally those people are within a public sector environment and will hopefully offer that help for nothing. We are talking about one local authority potentially talking to another local authority who has been through a similar situation.

  Q58  Nigel Griffiths: That is what has led us into the problem though. Unless they can hire that person who is the contract manager—and that generally does not happen but you may be able to give me a case—is there not a case for having a central pool of contract managers on these multi, multi million pounds projects?

  Mr Stewart: You cannot say there is a general rule that one should create a pool of contract managers. The first port of call is the existing support which comes from within departmental units. They have the ability to come to PUK. What we are certainly encouraging is sharing of knowledge and expertise and help between authorities.

  Mr Kingman: James is being bashful. One of the reasons we set up Partnerships UK was precisely to provide that kind of service, so that public sector procuring authorities could hire PUK to help them, so that they could actually manage these things properly.

  Q59  Nigel Griffiths: Right. But we are in the position where a third of PFI hospitals do not have contract managers and you seem to be pooh-poohing the idea that you might supply them and, given that these are usually more than £100 million as contracts, if I am not mistaken, I am surprised that health authorities, perhaps previously starved of funds, not used to procuring new hospitals, have any expertise at all in-house of that order; indeed that is what they tell me.

  Mr Kingman: What we are saying is that we would very strongly encourage them to hire an ongoing contract manager.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 2 September 2008