Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


1.  Letter from Sir Brian Bender, Permanent Secretary, Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform

BERR & NDA BUDGETS—SPRING SUPPLEMENTARY ESTIMATES

  I am writing to you to provide further information on the Spring Supplementary Estimates being published today, particularly in relation to the funding of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority. In view of the fact that the Public Accounts Committee has a hearing on the NAO report "The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority: Taking Forward Decommissioning" scheduled for the 25th February, I thought it would be helpful to provide you with more detail than that set out in the Estimate to assist the Committee's understanding. The timing of the publication of the Estimates has dictated the timing of this letter.

  The Spring Supplementary Estimate shows that BERR is drawing down significant sums of End Year Flexibility and also making a claim on the Reserve to meet funding pressures this year. This action is necessary mainly to meet a shortfall in Nuclear Decommissioning Authority budget in 2007/08 and it is on this that this letter will concentrate.

  An issue has arisen concerning the budgeting treatment of income received by the NDA, particularly that relating to Waste Substitution. There had been an understanding that proceeds could be recognised when income was invoiced and receivable. It is now clear that this income should have been treated under standard Treasury budgeting rules for commercial income which align with the accounting treatment under FReM (UK GAAP). The standard accounting treatment for income recognised under long-term contracts is that it should normally be recognised over a period of time as the service is performed for the customer, rather than in a single year.

  There was an expectation that proceeds from Waste Substitution this year could be used to meet expenditure commitments in 2007/8. These proceeds have now been received. However, the potential requirement to spread the revenue over a number of years, would only allow a proportion of these proceeds to be recognised in the NDA budget this year.

  This treatment of the Waste Substitution Income has contributed in large part to a £400m shortfall between the NDA's forecast expenditure and forecast income in 2007/8, for which it has been necessary to draw down EYF and make a claim on the Reserve in the Spring Supplementary Estimates.

  It is obviously regrettable that such a situation should arise and also so late in the financial year. We have looked across BERR budgets to realise any underspends that might be put towards the shortfall but, at this late stage in the year, the options available to us are limited.

  The Department is reviewing how this situation arose and what lessons need to be learnt for the future. This work involves the Department, Shareholder Executive, HMT and the NDA. We are also looking at the forecast figures for future years to ensure that we have a full understanding of the effect of the revised accounting and budgeting treatment in future years.

  I am copying this letter to the Clerk of the Business and Enterprise Select Committee and Tim Burr at the National Audit Office.

19 February 2008






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 10 July 2008