Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 20-39)

14 NOVEMBER 2007

DEPARTMENT FOR CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT AND OLYMPIC DELIVERY AUTHORITY

  Q20  Mr Dunne: Is that part of what you have just described?

  Mr Stephens: Yes, we monitor the cashflow on a monthly basis.

  Q21  Mr Dunne: That is not what I asked. Do you have a monthly cashflow per project?

  Mr Higgins: We have a monthly cashflow per project and we monitor it also monthly and report it to the Olympic Board.

  Q22  Mr Dunne: Has that been made available to the NAO?

  Mr Higgins: Well, the NAO sit at our Audit Committee and in fact there is one on Friday which will go through the monthly reports on projects.

  Q23  Mr Dunne: Sir John, could I ask you whether it was available when you prepared this Report?

  Mr Hawkswell: I think the position is that, when we prepared the Report, there was a recognition that there was still further work to do in terms of working through some of that underpinning detail.

  Mr Stephens: We have no problem with providing it to the NAO.

  Q24  Mr Dunne: Well, I am pleased to hear you say that because The Daily Telegraph two weeks ago had a member of the London Olympic Board, saying, "We need a very clearly defined budget, a very clearly defined cashflow analysis which is regularly updated and a very clear focus on the contingency and how it is allocated to specific project lines in the budget", and that is a member of your Board. Do you not provide the regular financial information to your board members?

  Mr Stephens: That is the Olympic Board which approved the ODA's budget for 2007-08 in March and that is publicly available. It sets out the planned spending by categories, like the Olympic Park, master planning, enabling works, structures, bridges, highways, power lines, undergrounding, utilities, Olympic Stadium, Aquatic Centre, and—

  Q25  Mr Dunne: But are you not providing them with regular monthly information?

  Mr Stephens: Indeed. We report against that on a monthly basis to the Olympic Board.

  Q26  Mr Dunne: So this board member was asleep, was he, and he was not reading his papers?

  Mr Stephens: Well, all I can say is that we report against the 2007-08 ODA budget, as agreed by the Olympic Board, on a monthly basis to the Olympic Board.

  Q27  Mr Dunne: Does this go to the level of detail of monthly cashflows per project? This is the issue: reporting on a top-line basis does not allow either board members or the NAO to have a proper test of whether you are on track to achieve the budget. The reason why I am pressing you on this is because, in order for this Committee to have a real sense of how we are achieving the milestones in order to get the projects delivered on time and within budget, unless you have budgets which are broken down on a project basis by month for cashflows and for contingency, we are not going to get the answers.

  Mr Higgins: We report to the Olympic Board on the cashflow every month, the overall cashflow, and to the Funders Committee. The actual individual projects are reported through a wide range of other reviews, including our own Board and our own various committees.

  Q28  Mr Dunne: Can you make those available to the NAO for their next report?

  Mr Higgins: Yes.

  Q29  Mr Dunne: Sir John, perhaps you will be able to take that up when you do your next report.

  Sir John Bourn: Certainly.

  Q30  Mr Dunne: Can we just look at contingency for a moment, paragraph 66, and the Chairman has already referred to the £360 million released to the ODA last June. Has the contingency been allocated on a project basis, firstly, and, secondly, on a time basis, on a monthly basis?

  Mr Stephens: Each project has an element of contingency and that has been budgeted in from the start at the project contingency level. As the NAO Report explains, of the initial £500 million allocated, the extra contingency allocated to the ODA, £360 million of that has been approved for allocation to individual projects over and above the contingency built into individual project baselines. That leaves more than £2 billion of programme contingency—

  Q31  Mr Dunne: I am sorry, Mr Stephens, but I have very limited time, so could you answer the question: has each project got a contingency allocated to it and has that been allocated on a time-phase basis?

  Mr Higgins: No, we do not allocate the contingency on a project basis on a monthly basis. We cashflow the underlying project, but we do not anticipate spending—

  Q32  Mr Dunne: So you do not know, and we will not be able to track, how you are doing and spending and, to get back to the Chairman's question, how you are doing in using up the contingency because you have not got a plan for that?

  Mr Higgins: No. Absolutely we do have a plan, of course, but we do not allocate contingency to be spent in advance of it being required.

  Q33  Mr Dunne: Can I turn to the back end of the project. You have mentioned, Mr Stephens, that there will be some profit to be taken from land sales at the end of the project. On completion, at the end of the Olympics in 2012, how much income has been assumed would be generated from the onward sale of assets in this budget?

  Mr Stephens: Nothing from the sale of land, with the exception of a profit share from the Village which is currently under negotiation in the contract that will be signed shortly.

  Q34  Mr Dunne: Is it anticipated that any other assets would be sold, that any constructed assets would be sold?

  Mr Stephens: None of that is assumed within the budget.

  Q35  Mr Dunne: So any revenue generated would be a gain back to the Exchequer on some basis?

  Mr Stephens: Yes, and indeed that is reflected in the Memorandum of Understanding, reflecting the share of profits from the land between the Mayor and the Lottery.

  Q36  Mr Dunne: Has there been any assumption made for rectification work for the equivalent to dilapidations in a residential property when that might revert either for sale or to a previous owner?

  Mr Higgins: Is this in the Village?

  Q37  Mr Dunne: Any of the projects.

  Mr Higgins: There is certainly an allowance within the Village to repair the Village or to make the Village good for sale after it has been used for the Games.

  Q38  Mr Dunne: And the main stadium itself is going to be taken down in part?

  Mr Higgins: Yes, there is money allowed in the main stadium budget to transform that to legacy.

  Q39  Mr Dunne: What provisions are there in any of the asset purchase contracts for reversionary interests on the resale or subsequent sale of land?

  Mr Higgins: The land in the Park is owned by the LDA and, when the LDA sells that land, there is clearly an agreement between the Government and the LDA to recover surplus profits which are shared by the Lottery.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 22 April 2008