Select Committee on Public Accounts Fourteenth Report


4  Maximising the benefits of the Games

26. The prospect of the legacy from hosting the Games was central to London's bid. The broad concept includes the sports venues that will remain after 2012, the regeneration of the local area, the socio-economic benefits for the United Kingdom as a whole, as well as the sporting benefits, such as increasing participation at grassroots level.[28]

27. In June 2007, the Government had set out the five high level legacy promises which it intended to deliver. [29] These were to:

  • make the United Kingdom a world-leading sporting nation;
  • transform the heart of East London;
  • inspire a generation of young people to take part in local volunteering, cultural and physical activity;
  • make the Olympic Park a blueprint for sustainable living; and
  • demonstrate the United Kingdom is a creative, inclusive and welcoming place to live in, visit, and for business.

28. The Comptroller and Auditor General's July 2007 report stated that the legacy plans and designs for the venues had not been finalised. The Department and the Delivery Authority told us that the legacy plans were now becoming increasingly certain. The 'Legacy Action Plan' was to be published early in 2008 by the Department, and the Olympic Delivery Authority would be working with the London Development Agency during 2008 on a 'Legacy Master Plan', setting out arrangements for the Olympic Park after the Games.[30]

29. With regard to specific sports facilities, the Aquatics Centre would provide two 50 metre pools and a diving pool, which would be available for both elite and community use after the Games, and the Main Stadium would be a publicly owned asset located in an area particularly short of facilities for community use. The stadium would provide an international standard athletics track and field facility, including warm-up track, and would also be available for other sports. The Olympic Delivery Authority said that the use of the stadium by a Premiership football club was considered incompatible with athletics because of the distance between the field of play and the seating, although a number of rugby and other football clubs have expressed interest.[31]

30. The legacy objectives for the Games include maximising for London and the United Kingdom the employment and skills benefits arising from Games-related business. The Delivery Authority's target was to employ 1,000 construction industry apprentices over the duration of the programme. The Authority said that some 20 were currently employed on the Olympic Park, and the major construction contractors had established a training programme on site.[32]

31. The Delivery Authority told us that around half of the 493 suppliers contracted by them to date came from regions of the UK outside London, and that it was planning initiatives to help businesses in the regions to bid for work. There were approximately 1,500 employees on site, of whom some 180 had previously been unemployed. Nearly half the workforce was from within London, but the Delivery Authority was unable to say how long those previously unemployed remained in employment in the longer term, and whether workers deemed to be from local boroughs were resident there before the construction programme began.[33]

32. Another intended legacy benefit is to increase participation in sport at community and grassroots level. The revised funding package for the Games, however, included £124 million from the four sports lottery distributors. The Department considered that the reduction in funding for community sport via the lottery, arising from funding the Olympics, was balanced by the Government's announcement of an additional £100 million investment in school and community sport and by Sport England's plans to raise an additional £50 million from the private sector.[34]


28   C&AG's previous report, Session 2006-07, Preparations for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games-Risk assessment and management, HC 252, paras 84-92 Back

29   Our Promise for 2012-How the UK will benefit from the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games, Department for Culture, Media and Sport, June 2007 Back

30   Qq 86, 160; C&AG's Report, para 51 Back

31   Qq 122-125, 157 Back

32   Q 101 Back

33   Qq 97-98, 100, 104-105; Supplementary memorandum submitted by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport Back

34   Qq 155-156; C&AG's Report, Appendix 4; Department for Culture and Media and Sport Press Release, 13 July 2007, Five hours of sport a week for every child-£100m campaign Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 22 April 2008