Select Committee on Public Accounts Fourteenth Report


3  Engaging the private sector

22. In 2004, Partnerships UK advised the Department that there was potential to secure £1,300 million of private financing for the Games, but that the information to support a robust analysis of the scope for private sector funding was not yet available. In particular, there was no legacy plan, which Partnerships UK considered would be the key to determining a more accurate assessment of potential private sector funding opportunities. After considering this advice the Department reached a more conservative estimate of £738 million for private sector funding (nearly one-fifth of the total funding then required). This was the estimate in place at the time of the bid to host the Games.[23]

23. In June 2005, the Department received further advice from Partnerships UK that there was little prospect of securing significant private sector funding to deliver the Olympic Park due to the tight timetable and a lack of clearly identifiable revenue streams. At the time of our hearing there were still no detailed legacy plans. In the March 2007 budget, the Department reduced the estimated private sector funding to £165 million, which comprised contributions to the media and broadcast facilities and to utilities on the Olympic Park.[24]

24. The Department considered the overall level of private sector contribution towards the Games was significantly higher when sponsorship contributions to the LOCOG budget and the Olympic Village were taken into account. LOCOG's budget, however, has always been separate from that for the venues and infrastructure (see paragraphs 2 and 14 above).[25] The Olympic Delivery Authority confirmed that it still intended that the majority of the Village would be paid for by the private sector, but with a public sector contribution of about £175 million to the cost , which was reflected in the March 2007 budget. It expected that following conversion of the Olympic Village to housing units, their sale after the Games would yield substantial profits which would be shared with the public sector funders. The contract for the Village was due to be signed shortly.[26]

25. Private sector construction firms will build the Olympic venues and infrastructure, and their response to the Olympic Delivery Authority's invitations to bid will have an important bearing on the cost of the Games. The Authority, however, was operating in a very competitive construction market. Whilst there had been competition for infrastructure works, it has experienced difficulties in achieving competition for the main venues, and only one bidder had emerged for the Main Stadium.[27]


23   Qq 12, 61-63; C&AG's Report, para 30-31; Figure 7 Back

24   Q 86; C&AG's Report, paras 31, 51; Figure 7 Back

25   Qq 136-137 Back

26   Qq 12, 33, 82, 87; C&AG's Report, para 53 Back

27   Qq 94-96, 119; C&AG's Report, para 52 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 22 April 2008