Select Committee on Public Administration Fourth Report


3  The Committee at work

Working Methods

46. In general, we follow the standard Select Committee method of working—that is to say, inviting written memoranda, and subsequently taking oral evidence. We continue to make it our practice to take evidence in public unless there are overwhelming reasons not to do so, which was not the case at any stage in 2007. This principle was particularly important when we held our inquiry into Propriety and Peerages and there were suggestions in certain quarters that we might look at evidence collected by the police in the course of their investigation into "cash for honours". To do so would have meant proceeding in private, which, given the public interest in transparency, we were not prepared to do.

47. However, there are occasions when we have gone beyond the standard Select Committee inquiry format. For example, we continue to arrange seminars to discuss important questions of public administration. We held two such seminars in 2007. The first, in May, concerned our then-nascent inquiry into commissioning public services from the Third Sector, and was invaluable in shaping our inquiry. The second seminar, already mentioned, took place in June and discussed issues arising from our Ethics and Standards report. We are grateful to all of our participants, and continue to commend this approach to other committees. We are particularly grateful to the National Audit Office, which has provided valuable background briefing on a number of areas, as well as staff support. We are also grateful to all of our Specialist Advisers this year, who have aided us on a number of inquiries, and we have also relied at times on assistance from the Hansard Society and the House of Commons Library.

48. We also continue to use committee visits, both within and outside the United Kingdom, to inform our inquiries and our general understanding of public administration. During 2007 our visits have helped to frame the findings of our inquiries, and also to influence us in deciding on future inquiries. Details of our visits during the period are in table 3 below. Where possible, we use visits to inform more than one inquiry.

Table 3: Visits by the Public Administration Select Committee in 2007
Location Purpose of visit
Inner London Crown Court, Jobcentre Plus Clapham Common, Identity and Passport Service Skills for Government
Community Care Navigators and Community Links, Newham Putting People First
Washington DC, United States Lobbying, Parliamentary Scrutiny of Public Appointments

Relationship with Departments

49. As our inquiries can range widely across government, we cannot sustain direct relationships with everybody we may scrutinise. We therefore rely heavily on the Cabinet Office and particularly on the Propriety and Ethics team to manage our interactions across the public sector. As always, we are grateful for the continued support they have provided to us. We are particularly grateful for their support in arranging committee visits, notably this year to public service providers within London, and for their diligence in keeping us abreast of important developments. We also established relationships in 2007 with the Office of the Third Sector and with the Charity Commission, and look forward to working with these organisations in the future.

50. While our relationship with the Cabinet Office remains positive, however, we are concerned that it appears to be increasingly difficult for the department to respond to Select Committee reports within two months—although the Cabinet Office continues to expect this of other departments in the guidelines it issues. This is clearly unsatisfactory. We recognise that in some circumstances there are sound reasons for delaying publication of a Government response (notably where that response will be more helpful if it is slightly delayed). It is also not always the fault of the Cabinet Office, especially when responses need to be produced across different departments. But delay has become the rule rather than the exception. In two cases, we waited more than a year for a response.[33] The Department for Work and Pensions gave a positive contrast, responding helpfully to both of our reports on pensions within the recommended two months—in one case producing a response within two weeks, while managing volleys of technical correspondence. The Cabinet Office has consistently failed to produce responses to our recent reports within two months—quite often failing by a great distance. While there may on occasion be good reason for this failure, the cumulative effect has a negative impact on our ability to follow up our work. We hope that there will be substantial improvements in 2008.

Future Work

51. A lot of our work in 2007 has looked at the provision of public services. This will always be a focus for us, as will the performance of the Civil Service. The programme of Departmental Capability Reviews has recently been completed, and we will be monitoring how they are taken forward. We will also be monitoring specific elements of government performance, such as the continuing concerns over the implementation of tax credits, and the ongoing work by the Charity Commission to define public benefit. Beyond this, our programme will include continuing our inquiry into the regulation of lobbying, which commenced in November.

52. A major theme is likely to be constitutional reform. Although its contents are not yet known, the draft Constitutional Renewal Bill has the potential at least to be of lasting significance. We will not be the only Committee with an interest in it, but we shall certainly be examining some of its provisions, not least on putting the Civil Service onto a statutory footing. We have already begun 2008 by reporting on parliamentary involvement in public appointments. More constitutional reforms may be on the table in 2008, whether they are greater parliamentary oversight of prerogative powers, more independence for ethical regulators, or changes arising out of questions about propriety and peerages. We hope to be able to look back a year from now on twelve months of significant change.


33   Fourth Special Report of Session 2007-08, Whitehall Confidential: The Publication of Political Memoirs: Government Response to the Committee's Fifth Report of Session 2005-06, HC 91; and Fourth Special Report of Session 2006-07, The Ministerial Code: the case for independent investigation: Government Response to the Committee's Seventh Report of Session 2006-07, HC 1088 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 24 January 2008