Select Committee on Transport Written Evidence


APPENDIX 1

  The following is a timeline of events leading to Metronet entering administration.

  1.  On 29 June 2007 Metronet Rail BCV Limited ("MRBCV") filed for an Extraordinary Review with the PPP Arbiter, claiming additional costs for which it sought reimbursement of £992 million. As part of that filing, MRBCV asked for an Interim Adjustment to the Infrastructure Service Charge of £400 million, which was later increased to £551 million. MRBCV requested the interim relief because its lenders had suspended further funding, its shareholders had declined to contribute further resources and its cash reserves and future payments from LU were insufficient to meet its obligations, according to its projections.

  2.  On 16 July, the PPP arbiter issued a draft determination on MRBCV's request for interim relief that provisionally awarded £121 million, payable beginning January 2008 and subject to various conditions regarding solvency of MRBCV. The interim increase in the Infrastructure Service Charge and the conditions for and timing of its payment in the draft determination left MRBCV with insufficient resources to discharge its contractual obligations.

  3.  The Metronet Infracos are subject to a special insolvency regime known as PPP administration introduced by sections 220 to 224 of the Greater London   Authority Act 1999 ("GLA Act"). This special regime allows the Mayor to apply for a PPP administration order. Under a PPP administration order, the court directs one or more named insolvency practitioners (each known as a PPP administrator) to manage the affairs, business and property of the Metronet Infracos for the achievement of the purposes of the PPP administration order as set out in the GLA Act 1999 and in a manner which protects the respective interests of the members and creditors of the Metronet Infracos. The purposes of a PPP administration order are:

    —  the transfer to another company or (as respects different parts of its undertaking) two or more companies, as a going concern, of so much of the company's undertaking as it is necessary to transfer in order to ensure that the activities may be properly carried on; and

    —  the carrying on of those relevant activities pending the making of the transfer.

  4.  Letters were received by LU from the Directors of both Metronet Infracos on 17 July 2007 confirming that, as a result of the PPP Arbiter's draft directions in respect of MRBCV's claim for an interim adjustment to the Infrastructure Service Charge and following discussions between the companies, their lenders and shareholders, both Metronet Infracos had concluded that they were or were likely to become unable to pay their debts. On that basis both Metronet Infracos invited the Mayor to petition for the appointment of a PPP Administrator to both Metronet Infracos.

  5.  A Mayoral Approval Form ("MAF") was signed by the Mayor on 17 July 2007. The MAF recorded the Mayor's directions concerning the presentation of a petition and the provision of a loan facility and indemnity to the PPP administrators. Following the Mayor's direction, petitions for PPP administration of the Metronet Infracos were submitted by TfL to the High Court at 8:00 am Wednesday 18 July 2007. Orders were granted by Mr Justice Lightman appointing three partners and one director from Ernst & Young LLP as the PPP administrators.

October 2007



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 25 January 2008