Select Committee on Transport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60 - 64)

WEDNESDAY 17 OCTOBER 2007

MR CHRIS BOLT

  Q60  Chairman: I am not saying that they were not asking for five times more, I am saying that the range you have come back to is still, even though you said, "Knock it off, lads, you are pushing for too much," or whatever the arbitrator's language is for that sort of phrase, you still said it is somewhere between £100 million and nearly £500 million?

  Mr Bolt: Yes, and that was on the basis of initial work. I have now had, as I explained earlier, the further submissions from Metronet and London Underground and on 12 November I will publish a number for the efficient cost overrun, a single number.

  Q61  Chairman: We will have to wait in some suspense until that moment!

  Mr Bolt: I am afraid you will.

  Q62  Clive Efford: I just want to ask one last question. You have said that had you been allowed to go ahead with your independent review in 2005 you may have been able to highlight the problems earlier. How early in the contracts were you aware that there were difficulties?

  Mr Bolt: I was aware that there were issues about delivery pretty early on, because one of the bits of information my office gets is delivery of the stations programme and you could see that slipping. What I was not aware of was the scale of the cost overrun until I carried out the 2006 Annual Report.

  Q63  Clive Efford: So has your inability to actually step in and insist on an independent report at that stage, when you became aware of those concerns, contributed to the problem?

  Mr Bolt: My view is that had I carried out the Annual Report in 2005, some of the issues would have been put on the table -

  Q64  Clive Efford: Would you have been able to do it earlier, had you had that power?

  Mr Bolt: We were ready to do it. I was fully staffed and we had developed the work programme to carry it out.

  Chairman: As always, Mr Bolt, you have been very instructive. We are always very impressed with your use of language. It does not always convey exactly what we would like, but I think we have got there. Thank you very much for coming. We look forward to seeing your report.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 25 January 2008