DFID's Programme in Bangladesh - International Development Committee Contents


4  TACKLING GENDER INEQUALITY

78. Despite progress in improving some indicators of gender equality, for example in school enrolments and reductions in maternal mortality, Bangladesh ranks low on the UNDP's Gender Empowerment Measure—108th out of 109 ranked countries.[112] This index measures the extent to which women and men are able actively to participate in economic and political life and to take part in decision-making.[113]

79. The way women are treated in society is also an indicator of gender equality. According to DFID, 60% of women in Bangladesh suffer from domestic violence at some point.[114] Dr Hossain told us: "domestic violence is probably the single greatest human insecurity threat that people in Bangladesh face […] women-based violence from their partners is among the highest rates in the world."[115] The fear of crime and insecurity has curtailed women's mobility with implications for their ability to go out to work.

80. Women typically earn only 65% of the amount men do for the same jobs.[116] The World Bank reports that, while the gender gap in terms of equal pay narrowed between 2000 and 2005, this mainly benefited better-off salaried workers in the middle and higher end of income distribution.[117] The Bangladesh Institute for Development Studies (BIDS) points out that women in the poorest households are worse off because of the social dynamics: "women in poor households are marginalized due to the societal and intra-household inequality and a lack of empowerment in making choices."[118]

DFID's approach

81. DFID's Country Plan says that it will promote gender equality and improvements in the status of women. DFID is tackling gender inequality in three ways: (i) policy dialogue with Government, other donors and civil society; (ii) targeting through specific programmes, with sex-disaggregated data to track progress; and (iii) helping to ensure that different budget lines are gender sensitive.[119] DFID seeks to ensure that women have access or are prioritised in its education, health and extreme poverty programmes. It has helped the government to set up a budgeting system which can track expenditure with a gender focus and it is contributing to a media campaign to raise awareness of gender inequality.[120]

Maternal and neonatal mortality

82. As with the provision of other basic services in Bangladesh, maternal care is provided through government programmes, NGOs and the private sector.[121] Women and Children First report a reduction in maternal mortality from 574 per 100,000 live births in 1991 to 290 in 2006.[122] The target is to reduce this to 147 per 100,000 live births by 2015.[123] However 80% of births still take place at home without trained assistance resulting in an estimated 12,000 maternal deaths per year.[124] Neonatal mortality rates are also high. This is related to maternal care since it is difficult to anticipate birthing difficulties or babies being born in need of medical care when women have had no antenatal care. Professor Costello from University College London expressed some scepticism about whether the fall in maternal mortality rates could be credited to improvements in maternal care. He thought community mobilisation was a more significant contributor, along with nutritional change and access to antibiotics.[125] BRAC told us that much more investment was needed in community organisations and women's groups which focus on maternal mortality to encourage improvements in care provision at the local level.[126]

83. DFID pools its funding with others donors towards a health, nutrition and population sector programme managed by the World Bank. This aims to create improvements in health, nutrition and family welfare especially for the most vulnerable, including women. It says that this has increased access to antenatal care from 48% in 2004 to 52% in 2007 and access to skilled birth attendants (SBAs) from 13.5% to 18% over the same period. DFID believes its programme has:

    […] reached 9.4 million poor people in urban areas through a maternal health programme implemented by UN agencies. This has renovated obstetric facilities and improved access by ensuring that skilled birth attendants are there around the clock. We have improved home based maternal and child care by training community birth attendants on when and how to get women to hospital if a life-threatening situation develops. In pilot areas, this is a crucial link directly to the government voucher scheme.[127]

84. While this is commendable, we were told that only one-third of the required number of skilled birth attendants were in post and that many women did not use a birth attendant even when one was available. This was due to the relatively low status of women in Bangladesh society where many families did not consider it worth their time or money to send mothers-to-be to health care facilities. In households where women had outside employment, their status increased and they were more likely to be encouraged to use skilled birth attendants.[128] This corresponds with the World Bank's findings that poor pregnant women have significantly less contact with health services in comparison to better-off women. The Bank also notes that this did not change significantly over the period from 1996-2004.[129]

85. Professor Costello also expressed concern about the regulation of care for mothers and newborn babies, particularly at the local level:

    By and large, the district hospitals, which often cater for four to six million, were not too bad, and the NGO facilities were not too bad, they did reasonably well. Once you got below that, to union level, and remember a union still covers 25,000 people, the services were of extremely low quality, and even worse was the private sector at that level. A lot of very bad things were being done. There is an issue around regulation here.[130]

He suggested there was a general need to link DFID's research programmes more closely to its country programmes so that lessons learned from research studies could be disseminated and applied at country level.[131] This would also facilitate better monitoring and evaluation of the impact of maternal health programmes and allow the most effective interventions to be replicated in different country programmes.

86. Bangladesh has made some improvements in access to antenatal care, and maternal mortality is declining. However it is off track to meet the MDG for reducing maternal mortality. The shortage of skilled birth attendants and the low usage where they exist is a key factor behind continued high rates of maternal mortality, especially for the poor. More needs to be done to improve and expand maternal and neonatal care. In addition there is limited statistical data about how and why changes are taking place in maternal mortality rates. Government and donor-funded programmes have made some progress but there is a weak relationship between research programmes and country programmes. We recommend that DFID increase and expand its funding for maternal care, including increased evaluation and monitoring of programmes to establish which are most effective. It should also increase its focus on promoting the benefits of assisted deliveries, specifically targeted towards the poorest families

Empowering women

87. Christian Aid pointed out that, despite evidence of women's advancement in some specific areas, "women remain largely marginal to key decision making processes and are poorly represented in political structures at national and local levels."[132] Sandra Kabir said that having a female prime minister had not had any impact on the status of women in the country.[133] Christian Aid also noted that, while DFID had a "women and girls first approach", its main focus was in the social sectors such as girls' education and maternal health with less attention given to economic opportunities and decision-making. Christian Aid believed DFID should do more to promote women's involvement in decision-making processes for example by sponsoring women in management roles in NGOs, the private sector and in government. One World Action made a similar suggestion and believed that this should become a key component of DFID's wider work on governance and aid effectiveness.[134] Christian Aid pointed out that poor development indicators for women were a reflection of their lack of economic and political power: "women lack control over income and expenditure decision at the household level and are also limited in their participation in decision making, both at family level and in society". [135]

88. The Government of Bangladesh is aware that gender disparities need to be addressed. This is included in its poverty reduction strategy papers.[136] Some steps have been taken. A number of seats in the National Assembly are reserved for women. However, two-thirds of these are not contested, creating a division between those elected in contested seats and those chosen by their peers. Christian Aid noted that "even when the quota system is introduced it still leads to a form of segregation and a marginalising of women within these decision making structures."[137]

89. Traidcraft pointed out that:

    [….] while there are constitutional affirmations of gender equality, state legislation and institutions frequently overlook the rights of women. There will therefore need to be a deep level of commitment on the part of the Bangladeshi government in order to make significant change.[138]

BRAC agreed that there were many good laws which were gender-sensitive, but the laws were not always implemented. DFID assured us it was seeking to redress this and that some progress had been made:

    We supported a campaign with Sweden, Denmark and Norway to raise awareness about these issues over the past year and our support through the rights and governance challenge fund led to a Bill against domestic violence. It is a thread that runs right through the country programme.[139]

DFID Bangladesh has a Gender Action Plan which it is in the process of revising.

90. Many of the problems which women face in Bangladesh are linked to their status in society. We encourage donors to address this more robustly. One way in which this can be done is by promoting women's involvement in decision-making processes. While Bangladesh already has some women in the highest echelons of power, a programme to promote wider participation and leadership of women committed to challenging the traditional role of women in NGOs and businesses could make a difference to the perception of women's contribution. We recommend that DFID take this forward as part of its wider work on governance. We also recommend that DFID include these objectives in its revised Gender Action Plan.

MONITORING PROGRESS

91. It is also important to have effective measures of gender equity. The Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS) suggested that DFID should adjust its approach so as to include specific targets for women and girls in all its programmes. Christian Aid proposed that DFID increase the use of sex-disaggregated data so that at least 50% of indicators across the DFID portfolio in Bangladesh were either disaggregated by sex or were "gender-sensitive". It also suggested that DFID make gender and social exclusion a routine part of its dialogue with the Government of Bangladesh. Women and Children First supported these suggestions.[140]

92. DFID told us that all of its programmes were monitored and the data was disaggregated by gender:

    [….] all of the programmes that we have actually monitor their impact, disaggregated by sex so that we can see what we are doing on the ground and that it is delivering. Our programmes generally in DFID are gender mainstreamed. That is how they are developed to begin with. Then, having the disaggregation of our monitoring can be a check on whether we are doing what we set out to do with our programmes.[141]

However, monitoring the impact of a programme on women is not the same as setting targets for what that programme should achieve in terms of its impact on women. Ms Kabir highlighted how little impact gender was actually having on policy formation or implementation, largely because there was inadequate monitoring and evaluation:

    Policy formulation is not gender sensitive. The same goes for the implementation of policy. At the programme level you have the same issue; the programmes are not designed or implemented in a way that is particularly gender sensitive […] if you look at monitoring and evaluation, you do not have disaggregated figures available to tell us about the impact of the health and family welfare government programme.[142]

93. DFID's strategy for promoting gender equality has not significantly changed the gender dynamics in Bangladesh. We believe DFID should increase its focus on gender and begin to consider new ways in which it can ensure that its social programmes do more than target women as beneficiaries and that its monitoring does more than note progress. We recommend that DFID create specific targets for each programme in terms of the number of women who will benefit and that it actively monitor these targets so that, if they fall short, the causes can be identified and addressed. Setting measurable targets is distinct from simply monitoring outcomes. These targets should be included in the Gender Action Plan for Bangladesh.


112   UNDP, Human Development Report, Table K: Gender Empowerment Measure and its components, UNDP, 2009 Back

113   UNDP, Measuring Inequality: Gender-related Development Index and Gender Empowerment Measure, www.hdr.undp.org Back

114   Q 214 Back

115   Q 18 Back

116   Q 214 Back

117   World Bank, Poverty assessment for Bangladesh, p x Back

118   Ev 54 Back

119   Ev 68 Back

120   Ev 71  Back

121   Q 52 Back

122   Ev 103. The 2007-08 UNDP Human Development Report gives a reported figure of 320 deaths per 100,000 live births and a figure adjusted for misreporting of 570 per 100,000 live births for 2005. Back

123   Ev 103 Back

124   Ev 78 Back

125   Q 47 Back

126   Q 51 Back

127   Ev 69 Back

128   Qs 53-54 Back

129   World Bank, Poverty assessment for Bangladesh, p 75 Back

130   Q 55 Back

131   Q 55 Back

132   Ev 61 Back

133   Q 59 Back

134   Ev 92 Back

135   Q 58 Back

136   Ev 80 Back

137   Q 58 Back

138   Ev 96 Back

139   Q 215 Back

140   Q 64 Back

141   Q 214 Back

142   Q 59 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2010
Prepared 4 March 2010