Annex 1
Table 4 Comparing Development Finance Institutions, by instrument,
sector (ultimate beneficiary), and geography
| |
Instruments
(share of portfolio, 2009)
| Sectors
(share of portfolio, 2009)
| Geography
(share of portfolio, 2009)
|
| |
equity
| loans
| guarantees
| Financial sector
| Infrastructure
| Agribusiness
| Industry
| Other
| ACP
| South Asia
| Rest
|
| BIO | 38%
| 62%
| 0%
| 45%
| 20%
| 5%
| 30%
| N/A
| 25%
| 12%
| 63%
|
| CDC | 96%
| 4%
| 0%
| 23%
| 34%
| 6%
| 18%
| 19% (i)
| 36%
| 28%
| 36%
|
| COFIDES |
94%
| 6%
| 0%
| 1%
| 45%
| 5%
| 47%
| 3%
| 5%
| 6%
| 89%
|
| DEG | 42%
| 57%
| 2%
| 35%
| 19%
| 13%
| 27%
| 6%
| 15%
| 11%
| 74%
|
| Finnfund |
45%
| 53%
| 2%
| 19%
| 28%
| 1%
| 44%
| 7%
| 33%
| 14%
| 53%
|
| FMO | 45%
| 51%
| 3%
| 42%
| 24%
| 3%
| 30%
| 2%
| 25%
| 11%
| 64%
|
| IFU/IØ/IFV
| 53%
| 44%
| 3%
| 5%
| 10%
| 15%
| 63%
| 8%
| 20%
| 8%
| 72%
|
| Norfund |
85%
| 15%
| 0%
| 23%
| 55%
| 5%
| 11%
| 5%
| 29%
| 8%
| 63%
|
| OeEB |
47%
| 42%
| 11%
| 100%
| N/A
| N/A
| N/A
| N/A
| 14%
| N/A
| |
| Proparco |
14%
| 84%
| 2%
| 45%
| 36%
| 4%
| 12%
| 2%
| 35%
| 8%
| 57%
|
| SBI | 57%
| 43%
| 0%
| 21%
| 13%
| 18%
| 47%
| 0%
| 7%
| 6%
| 87%
|
| SIFEM |
88%
| 12%
| 0%
| 18%
| 3%
| N/A
| 79%
| N/A
| 18%
| 12%
| 70%
|
| SIMEST |
100%
| 0%
| 0%
| 2%
| 8%
| 8%
| 78%
| 4%
| 2%
| 5%
| 93%
|
| SOFID |
0%
| 83%
| 17%
| N/A
| N/A
| N/A
| 100%
| N/A
| 100%
| 0
| 0%
|
| SwedFund |
64%
| 36%
| 0%
| 8%
| 22%
| 1%
| 64%
| 5%
| 44%
| 21%
| 35%
|
| EBRD (**)
| 15%
| 85%
| 0%
| 36%
| 37%
| 8%
| 18%
| N/A
| | | |
| EIB (**) |
| | | 2%
| 65%
| 10%
| 23%
| N/A
| | | |
| IFC (**) |
18%
| 55%
| 27%*
| 48%
| 25%
| 2%
| 25%
| N/A
| | | |
Notes: Other sectors include: Global Financial Markets; Global
Manufacturing & Services; Health & Education; Oil, Gas,
Mining & Chemicals; Sub-National Finance; Information and
Communication Technology (ICT); etc. (i) In the case of CDC, the
underlying portfolio 'other' sector category e.g. includes: Health
Care 8%; Mining 6%; Others 6%. (*) The Global Trade Finance Programme
is included. Moreover, a new agreement will allow IFC to market
the products of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA),
a deal which will give businesses added comfort as they move into
riskier markets. In 2010, the percentages had increased to 31%,
whereas loans had fallen to 45% and equity (including equity-type,
quasi-equity products) had increased to 23% (IFC 2010 Annual Report).
(**) For sectors we used commitments.ACP = Africa, Caribbean and
Pacific.Source: Kingombe et al (2011) based on the EDFI annual
report, annual DFI reports and own calculationsKingombe, C., I.
Massa and D.W. te Velde (2011), "Comparing Development Finance
Institutions, Literature Review", Report for UK DFID and
presented at CDC Roundtable on 20 January 2011.Table 5 Geographical
distribution of 2009 portfolio
| | East Asia and Pacific
| Europe and Central Asia
| Latin America and Caribbean
| Middle East and North Africa
| South Asia
| Sub-Saharan Africa
|
| EBRD | 0.3%
| 99.7% |
0.0% | 0.0%
| 0.0% | 0.0%
|
| EIB (external)
| 7.4% | 0.0%
| 23.7% |
42.6% | 5.5%
| 20.8% |
| IFC | 10.9%
| 22.2% |
27.1% | 7.5%
| 16.8% |
15.6% |
Source: DFI annual reports
|
|
