Select Committee on European Union Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 100 - 112)

WEDNESDAY 10 JANUARY 2007

MR RUDY VOLDERS AND MR YANNIC HULOT

  Q100  Chairman: Not quite, except that both systems are subject to fraud because you have tried it.

  Mr Hulot: With the reverse charge the fraud will be at the retail side.

  Mr Volders: At the end.

  Q101  Chairman: You are moving the fraud around?

  Mr Volders: The risk is moving to the retailer.

  Mr Hulot: With carousel fraud you have a small group which specialises in this fraud but with the reverse charge you have many, many fraudulent companies. It is impossible to handle it. If you have a big problem, after you have a very big problem, it is very difficult to comprehend.

  Lord Cobbold: Does this mean that we need a complete rehash of the VAT system?

  Chairman: Go to an origin system.

  Q102  Lord Cobbold: Sales tax or whatever.

  Mr Hulot: No, because you have other typologies, for example the definitive regime. It is very dangerous. In your company you have one invoice from Bulgaria and you have to say in one or two weeks if you can make the reimbursement. If you try to have contact with Bulgaria it is impossible to read what you have on the invoice, it is another alphabet, and you have to contact the anti-fraud unit in Bulgaria and ask, "Is it possible that you have £1 million on this invoice" and you have to answer within 10 days, which is impossible with the system of international co-operation now.

  Q103  Lord Kerr of Kinlochard: You would not favour a move to an origin system because of the difficulty of trusting?

  Mr Hulot: At this stage of international co-operation it is impossible. You have to reinforce the possibilities of direct exchanges and control and so on.

  Q104  Lord Watson of Richmond: You were talking about the difficulty of getting responses from Germany and the United Kingdom. In terms of the new Member States—Bulgaria and Romania—have you established contact with them or not?

  Mr Hulot: Yes, we did immediately. In the last quarter of last year they contacted us and asked us to visit and in February we will go to Bucharest and Sofia to make them—

  Q105  Lord Watson of Richmond: That is reassuring.

  Mr Volders: It was also the politics to co-operate. These new Members must immediately co-operate. I have visited Lithuania and their exchange programmes for information are performing better than the Belgians.

  Mr Hulot: There will be members from the network at this moment.

  Mr Volders: They have invested in new ICT, so they are the best performing machines.

  Q106  Lord Watson of Richmond: That is the most reassuring thing I have heard this morning.

  Mr Hulot: It means that by now they will receive all suspect transactions in the direction of their country from all the other Member States.

  Q107  Chairman: I am personally most grateful for your help on the technical side because it has managed to knock on the head one or two ideas we were nursing about the technicalities of dealing with fraud. I have deliberately not sought to seek answers from either of you on the purely political questions because had Mr Jamar been here it would have been proper to ask him, but it is not quite proper to put those to you. We are meeting Eurostat at 11.30 so I am afraid we probably need to despair of Mr Jamar but, on the other hand, perhaps we might correspond with him.

  Mr Hulot: No problem at all.

  Lord Watson of Richmond: And with you, Mr Hulot.

  Q108  Chairman: This technical information is most useful. We are very grateful for both of these reports which we had not seen. We can ask more questions, if we may, in writing.

  Mr Hulot: You can ask more questions at the technical level and also at the political level.

  Chairman: The technical level is extremely helpful.

  Q109  Lord Watson of Richmond: You are aware that the European Parliament is also now going to carry out an investigation into carousel fraud.

  Mr Hulot: The Economic Committee.

  Q110  Chairman: I would still like to talk to the technical practitioners.

  Mr Volders: Just as an example, we had an amazing VAT fraud in mineral oils beginning in 2000 and what did we do? We co-operated with the economic enterprises and there are two federations of petrol oil in Belgium and the Netherlands. All of the petrol oil comes from Rotterdam and is sent to Belgium. We have done a protocol between the two organisations, the two countries, to give all information when there is a tanker that is leaving Rotterdam, the Belgian authority is informed and vice versa, reciprocity. There are now no mineral oil frauds because we know everything. That ship must arrive there and if it does not arrive we have a problem. We have not detected another construction of VAT fraud in the mineral oil area with this simple agreement between two federations. When I say it was €300 million in 2000 and we have estimated that because of the detection of fraud we have eliminated it to zero and we can say there is now €300 million in the Treasury for Belgium.

  Q111  Chairman: Some number.

  Mr Volders: That was just with this agreement. This was what Mr Hulot said also. All the Directives and Regulations for the exchange of information are already implemented but we must do it.

  Q112  Chairman: That is a useful answer.

  Mr Volders: How can we do it, we have a contact point like we have with Mr Simon Felderman, and now you have a contact point with Mr Hulot. That is the only thing, we must know each other and have confidence in each other.

  Chairman: That is entirely right.

  Lord Watson of Richmond: That is something we could help to facilitate. I have given you one name from that newspaper report from the Revenue service.

  Chairman: Thank you very much indeed.







 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007