Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 1 - 19)

Ordered: that Counsel and Parties be called in.

  1. CHAIRMAN: This is the first meeting of the Select Committee of the House of Lords on the Crossrail Bill. You will see that we have plaques to say who we are and I am not going to go into details about our backgrounds because you can look us up if you want to. All I can tell you is that we have all been very carefully vetted to see that we have no interests that would possibly conflict with our ability to make a completely impartial decision on the matters that are going to be raised in front of us. We of course have no constituencies like you had with the Members in the other place.

Chairman's Opening Address

  2. The purpose of these sessions will be to listen to the Petitioners and their agents and make sure that they have a full opportunity to present their case within the scope of their legitimate interests. They have a right to be heard and the Promoters are not going to object to any of them being heard. If, however, Petitioners want to raise the same point as was raised in Petitions in the House of Commons, we will want to know what has happened since then because the Promoters, I know, have been trying to negotiate agreements and settlements with Petitioners who raised matters then and, if there is still something wrong, we would like to know what it is.

  3. This is a completely fresh set of proceedings and we come to it totally fresh; it is a new hearing altogether. However, there is perhaps one point, and you will have heard this before in the House of Commons, and that is that this Bill has now received a Second Reading in the House of Lords and in the Bill, in one of the schedules, is a complete list of all the works that will be authorised under it, the terminals, stations, the shafts; a huge list of things. Those are the principles of the Bill and, although we are not going to stop anybody from raising other matters, I have to tell you that we are bound by the principles of the Bill and we will not be able to do a great deal to help you.

  4. One of the issues that arose before was the east and west terminals for Crossrail. It was suggested that perhaps it should go to Reading and to Ebbsfleet. There is one development about this which has happened fairly recently on 6 February, and there is a copy of this document at the back of the room, as indeed there are a lot of documents at the back of the room. At the second reading, the Minister made it plain that this Bill was not going to contain provisions to extend Crossrail either to Reading or Ebbsfleet or anywhere else other than what is in the Bill. However, on 6 February, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport made a written ministerial statement which may be of interest to those who want to take this point. In relation to the line between Maidenhead and Reading, the Government is safeguarding a route. As for the destination of Ebbsfleet, they have not safeguarded it yet, but they are in negotiations with all concerned, including of course the local authorities, for an equal safeguarding arrangement. I think you may be interested in seeing the text of this, and it is available to you at the back.

  5. It would not be done under this Bill, but there is a piece of legislation called the Transport and Works Act 1992 which enables railways and other infrastructural works to be carried out under an order system with public inquiries and, if the Government decided to extend Crossrail in either direction or both, it would be done under that legislation and not in this Bill.

  6. I think the agenda is fairly well fixed. If you are in any doubt about it or indeed if you are in any doubt about anything else, will you please contact our clerks, who are sitting on either side of me and they will be available throughout, and they can always explain things to you. There is also a great deal of paper on the table at the back of the room, and some of it, I think, will be fairly familiar to you, but there is a pretty large red binder which some of my colleagues have brought with them today and that contains a great deal of information which may assist you.

Promoter's Opening Address

  7. Now, the sittings: today we are going to finish listening to me and then I am going to ask the Promoters to give a factual explanation of what is in the Bill. I do not know whether that will be finished by lunchtime, maybe it will, in which case this afternoon we will have the first of three presentations, again factual presentations, to deal with major issues which have arisen in the Commons' hearings. This afternoon we will have noise, and you will have to be alert for that because it is not an easy subject. Then tomorrow we will have compensation in the morning and then ground settlement and subsidence after that. Then we will start tomorrow afternoon with the first of our site visits. We are going to Whitechapel and the Spitalfields area, especially Hanbury Street, where we expect to meet some of the Petitioners, and we will be glad to do so. On Thursday, we are doing another site visit to the Isle of Dogs where the same applies. I did not know until yesterday, but there is going to be a third site visit a little bit later on where we are going to listen to the noise of underground trains and that will, therefore, be another opportunity. It is not necessarily the end of site visits because, if we need to undertake more in order properly to appreciate what Petitioners are saying, we will of course gladly do so. Anyway, the detail of the programme is a provisional one at the moment and is at the back of the room, so you can have a look at that. It will give you an idea of when Petitioners are likely to be on and we will try very hard to stick to it, although I cannot guarantee that it will always be so. We are going to sit on Mondays from 2.30 to 4.30 and on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays from 10.00 until 1.00 and from 2.30 until 4.30 and, as far as I know, it will all be here because we have all the electronic equipment and the papers. There is also a website. It is called www.parliament.co.uk and this will contain a great amount of information, but also, I am now told, you will be able to listen to the proceedings online, so you may not even wish to come, but that would be a pity!

  8. There used to be an arrangement whereby all Petitioners had to put in an appearance on the first day of the Committee's session. That has been waived and it does not matter if you are not here today, Petitioners. As long as you turn up on the day that you are indicated to appear, that will be fine and, when your turn comes, you can have your agent, your counsel or you can do it yourselves, but we would like you please to announce loud and clear who you are and what the point is, what the Petition is about.

  9. I am afraid, if you want to refer to documents, you will have to produce rather a lot of them, 16 copies please, not only because we all need them on the Committee, but so do the shorthandwriters, so do our clerks of course and so do the people who are running the visual display and, therefore, I am afraid it is rather a lot. If you can possibly get them to us before it is your turn, so much the better because we will all then be able to look at them.

  10. Now, these are in fact formal proceedings, they are the equivalent to a court and, as one of our attendants has been saying this morning, no mobile phones please.

  11. Hybrid bills, which is what this is technically called, are now extremely rare; I think the last one was the Channel Tunnel Rail Link. We want to hear your cases, Petitioners and Promoters. You have, I am afraid, as I have said, to stick to the principle of the Bill if you wish us to do anything about it. That is what the procedure is designed to deal with. There is going to be no challenge to the right of Petitioners to appear and, therefore, as I think is a useful customary arrangement, the Promoters will produce, before the Petition is heard, a response document which will give their provisional answer to what it is that the Petition puts forward.

  12. In a moment, I am going to ask Mr Elvin, on behalf of the Promoters, to give us a purely factual outline of what is in the Bill. He may be going to use the screens for all I know, I expect he will. Later on, when we come to the Petitions, I think the arrangement is that, although technically the Petitioners are entitled to start, it might be more convenient if the Promoters made a short statement of their position before the Petitioner begins. The Petitioner will then present his or her case, the Promoters will produce their evidence and the Petitioner has the final speech. We will not be giving immediate decisions on each Petition because some of them may interact and have to be considered jointly with others, and we will of course produce a report at the end of the proceedings.

  13. I think that is all I need now to say, subject to being corrected, and I will, therefore, ask Mr Elvin, on behalf of the Promoters, to give us a factual description. It might be helpful, Mr Elvin, if you just introduce your colleagues because I know you are going to share the work out and we would like to know who you all are, so I will hand over to you.

  14. MR ELVIN: My Lords and Lady, thank you for that. My Lords, I will introduce the team first. To my left are my learned friends, Ms Natalie Lieven and Mr Timothy Mould, and behind me is Mr Reuben Taylor and Mr Gwion Lewis. My Lords, we will be dividing the work up between us during the course of hearing the Petitions. I will be dealing broadly with environmental issues, issues arising with regards to railways industry, the Spitalfields area and to the extent that we need to deal with anything regarding alternative routes. My learned friends, Ms Lieven and Mr Mould, will deal broadly with the other Petitions and, indeed, they are going to share these opening remarks in due course. Mr Taylor and Mr Lewis are providing general support to the three of us.

  15. My Lords, this opening aims to introduce you to the project in very broad terms. We will explain individual aspects in more detail when we deal with issues raised by Petitioners and we are proposing to present in conjunction with our Powerpoint slides, which your Lordships should also have in hard copy should you want to take them away and there are hard copies available for anyone else who may want them.

  16. Crossrail is a major new cross-London rail link to serve London and the South East. It will support and maintain the status of London as a world city by providing a world-class transport system.[1] It will allow people to travel from their homes straight into central London without having to change at rail termini and it will allow people to get more quickly to their destinations and to relieve congestion, both at termini and on the underground system.

  17. You will see this is a general route map of Crossrail and it is probably easier to see in the paper copies than it is on the screen, but you will note the termini in the East and the West and in the South, South East.[2] You will also see a station on there which I will draw your attention to because, for reasons which I do not understand, it has been omitted from some of the later maps. You will see the Maryland Station there which, whilst it is shown on this map and it has been shown on the remaining maps, has not been named but it is meant to be there.

  18. My Lords, the Bill has widespread support which we will refer to a little later and the almost universal view at Second Reading was that Crossrail is a top priority now and should go ahead as soon as possible.

  19. Turning briefly to the Bill process, of course this is a hybrid Bill, the first since CTRL over ten years ago.[3] As your Lordships will know, a hybrid Bill is one which has features of both public and private Bills. There is no requirement for the Promoter to establish the need for the Bill in Committee as this has been done on the floor of the House. As your Lordship has already mentioned, the principle of the Bill cannot be questioned in Committee. Clearly the Committee is to consider Petitions by those whose interests are particularly affected by the Bill.



1   Crossrail Ref: P1, The Route (LINEWD-OPN1-002) Back

2   Crossrail Ref: P1, General Route Map (LINEWD-OPN1-003) Back

3   Crossrail Ref: P1, The Bill Process (LINEWD-OPN1-004) Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008