Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 220 - 235)

  220. CHAIRMAN: Mr Thornely-Taylor, that was extremely interesting. Thank you very much. I think it is not inconceivable that we may see you again with some of the Petitioners, and we look forward to that. For the moment, thank you very much indeed.

  221. MR ELVIN: My Lord, I have one message that I was passed for my Lord, Lord Snape, in respect of his question; just to let him know that the RER does not have rubber tyres.

  222. LORD SNAPE: They did the last time I was there, Mr Elvin! Perhaps it is a while since I was there. Of course; I am sorry, it was the Metro, anyway, not the RER.

  223. CHAIRMAN: Is this collection of slides going to be made available to the Petitioners?

  224. MR ELVIN: Yes. Copies can be made for anyone who requires them. Indeed, it may be possible even to put them on the website, if the Committee thinks that is appropriate. As I said, we supplied a draft of those slides to Sharpe Pritchard, who are Agents for the two lead authorities remaining, dealing with noise issues.

  225. CHAIRMAN: I think you may have some more questions on some of these points that we have been talking about.

  226. MR ELVIN: If the events in the other place are anything to go by, I suspect you will be hearing a little more on this subject—but perhaps less than in the other place.

  227. CHAIRMAN: Unless there is anything else, Mr Elvin, I think that brings us to the end of this afternoon, and we will start again with another teach-in at 10 o'clock tomorrow morning, but with a different expert.

  228. LORD BROOKE OF ALVERTHORPE: One final question, my Lord Chairman. Which is the nearest equivalent that we could look at to what Crossrail will be like?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) My Lord, the nearest equivalent from the point of view of groundborne noise in this country is the Jubilee Line Extension. It is a smaller diameter tunnel, the trains are smaller, but it is the first major example of the great leap forward in track design for underground railways. Sadly, it is very hard to find anywhere where you can hear it. I was given the job of finding somewhere to do measurements for the original Crossrail project and I ended up in the second basement of Christies in King Street as being the only place I could find where you could hear it at all. It would be, I think, impossible to arrange a site visit because I do not know of anywhere that there is anything to hear. The Channel Tunnel Rail Link is also an underground railway; it, too, was designed to 40 LAmax,S. I have done some investigations to see how it has turned out, but all the indications are that it, too, is very low in level. I think it would be hard—the difficulty is that the actual noise levels from modern underground railways are very low and it is extremely difficult to find anywhere to listen to them.

  229. LORD SNAPE: I suspect, Mr Thornely-Taylor, my distinguished colleague has asked the wrong question. What he means: is there any comparison between Crossrail and the RER in Paris?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) There are major engineering differences between the tunnels and the stations, but I will leave it to others to expand on that.

  230. LORD SNAPE: I feared as much, my Lord Chairman.

  231. BARONESS FOOKES: Is there likely to be any pile driving going on?
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) The general answer is no. Most pile insertion will be by auguring into the ground or by using diaphragm walls instead of piles. There may be some insertion of sheet piles by vibratory means and it is not impossible that local circumstances might require more aggressive forms of insertion, but in general the answer is no—of the kind I think you have in mind.

  232. BARONESS FOOKES: I ask because during the Jubilee Line Extension I was a Deputy Speaker in the Commons and sitting in the Speaker's Chair one night it felt like a series of minor earthquakes.
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) That is something which I hope will not occur on Crossrail, my Lady.

  233. CHAIRMAN: Thank you very much. So 10 o'clock tomorrow morning and we will deal with compensation to start with.

  234. MR ELVIN: Yes. Mr Mould will be leading on compensation and Ms Lieven will be leading on settlement tomorrow.

  235. CHAIRMAN: Mr Thornely-Taylor, we will look forward to seeing you again some time in the future.
  (Mr Thornely-Taylor) I will look forward to it very much, my Lord.






 
previous page contents

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008