Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 3240 - 3259)

  3240. MR WHEELER: This is the last page.

  3241. CHAIRMAN: The last page, we will finish that.

  3242. MR WHEELER: It seems to the residents who I represent that the Promoter cares a lot less about the listed buildings and the historic environment of our city than he does about the development potential of various sites on the city fringe. Furthermore, the Promoter has pursued a route that is demonstrably more circuitous, seemingly to protect these commercial interests as no other reason is apparent and to the detriment of the speed of operation, passenger comfort and safety, and the cost of both construction and future maintenance and, of course, to the detriment of the Spitalfields area. The base route has therefore been chosen on the basis of inadequate analysis to follow a safeguarded route for a failed and fundamentally different project on a tunnelling strategy that has been abandoned and on criteria for a shaft site that are no longer relevant. This is surely contrary to best practice, contrary to the strategy adopted by all other recent large-scale tunnel projects in the country, contrary to the best interests of the project itself and contrary to the public interest and, therefore, possibly illegal.

  3243. MR WHEELER: Returning to the issue of listed buildings, I will end my presentation with a request for a simple undertaking. That is that all listed and historic buildings undergo an accurate and comprehensive individual inspection and assessment in accordance with the guidelines of PPG 15, including internal issues, now and not once work has started, to determine the settlement impact and mitigation measures, first, for the long-term protection of the individual buildings that are affected and, secondly, to give a clear idea of the likely impact of the Promoter's preferred route alignment on the historic fabric of the area and, thirdly, in support of a proper analysis of the best route east out of Liverpool Street Station. Can you please assure us that we will not all be ignored --- I had crossed out the word "misled" in this presentation.

  3244. CHAIRMAN: Especially as it is misspelt.

  3245. MR WHEELER: That is why. Please give your assurance that we will not all be ignored yet again by Crossrail, and that the Promoter will now undertake the issues of settlement and the potential damage to the historic fabric of our area of the city seriously. I have asked for that specific undertaking, but can I just make a point cognisant of undertakings that all the residents of Spitalfields will be requesting at the end of the Spitalfields' presentations so what I need to say now is to confirm that I would ask that the same undertakings on behalf of the Petitioners that I represent will be granted. We have dealt with it in this way for convenience of the Committee to avoid repetition as I previously explained.

  3246. CHAIRMAN: Mr Wheeler, through you, could I request that the text of these various assurances and undertakings that you all would like to see are handed in pretty soon because otherwise it is not going to be possible for the Promoter to respond to them.

  3247. MR WHEELER: Sure, I will do that.

  3248. CHAIRMAN: You do not want to miss the opportunity when the Promoters are here dealing with your case to hear what it is they have to say about these things.

  3249. MR WHEELER: Yes, I only hesitate because I wonder how soon "soon" needs to be.

  3250. CHAIRMAN: The first thing that is going to happen when you come back from coffee is I am going to ask Mr Mould if he wants to ask you any questions. He probably will not but he may want to call evidence and in the course of that he may want to deal with this thing you are asking for.

  3251. MR WHEELER: During the break can I enquire as to how soon those undertakings can be got for you?

  3252. CHAIRMAN: It is entirely in your hands. If you want them properly attended to, the sooner everybody has them the better, but I cannot ask you under any time limit because it must be a matter for you and we cannot put pressure on you to produce documents you have not already got.

  3253. MR WHEELER: I will do my best to get hold of them immediately.

  3254. CHAIRMAN: It would be very helpful. Shall we adjourn for a quarter of an hour until five to 12.

After a short break

  3255. CHAIRMAN: I think we had better go on. Mr Mould, what do you want to do about this?

  3256. MR MOULD: My Lord, what I would like to do is first of all I certainly would not wish to ask Mr Wheeler any questions.

  3257. CHAIRMAN: You can if you want to and if he is prepared to answer them. If you do not want to, so be it.

  3258. MR MOULD: What I would much rather do is deal with the points he has raised with a view to giving the Committee and Mr Wheeler the reassurance that is required in relation to those points. That is what I would like to do. The way I propose to seek to do that is first of all remind the Committee that I am going to call Professor Mair tomorrow, and he will deal with detailed technical points in relation to assessment of settlement and will build, in that respect, on the presentation that he has already given to the Committee on the third day of the proceedings.

  3259. CHAIRMAN: He can also deal with this.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008