Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 9560 - 9579)

  9560. Nothing that we ask for, in terms of operation and maintenance, has anything to do with sale of their capital asset. That is entirely separate; that is a matter for TfL. We say, in terms, to this Committee, for these matters of public interest to be led by commerciality—commercial objectives—particularly in the most unfortunate way it has been handled by TfL, would be a great disservice to the Government's policy for the railways of this country. My Lords, I apologise for going beyond one o'clock but I am very grateful to your Lordships.

  9561. CHAIRMAN: Just before you finish, I am looking at the page that has the three undertakings that you are seeking.[40] You have got number two.

  9562. MR PURCHAS: We have got number two.

  9563. CHAIRMAN: Number one and number three. To what extent are they going to impinge upon the duty of the Secretary of State to make quasi-judicial decisions if TfL comes forward with its current proposition?

  9564. MR PURCHAS: Number one is the one I look for. That, plainly, does not depend upon any decision or discretion if an application is made under section 7. So far as 3 is concerned, if it is expressed that there is no intention at present to exempt, that will be more comforting. I think we were alarmed by the fact that this sort of emerged out of nowhere, without anything being said about it at all. It is really 1 we are looking for, my Lord.

  9565. CHAIRMAN: But 3 might impinge upon—

  9566. MR PURCHAS: With 3 I can see problems. I hope I will not be hung, drawn and quartered by those behind me, but I can see problems. I think the Committee can still say something about it.

  9567. CHAIRMAN: I do not think there is any doubt we will say something about it. What we might recommend is another thing.

  9568. MR PURCHAS: Absolutely.

  9569. CHAIRMAN: Thank you very much indeed.

  9570. MR PURCHAS: I am obliged, my Lord.

  9571. CHAIRMAN: I think we will adjourn. I am not quite sure what are performance measurement is.

  9572. MR ELVIN: I think it is 100 per cent, my Lord. My Lord, the position is I am told that BAA is not going to come. I understand from Mr George for EWS that on the property issues Old Oak Common is now resolved, they are not going to raise the strategic freight site issues, and so I think we are dealing with, probably, the infrastructure provision question that we dealt with with the rail freight group yesterday and are coming back to tomorrow, and an issue about compensation under the Network Code—as I understand what Mr George said. What I was going to start by doing was calling Mr Berryman to give you some more information on T5 and the possibility of a western link to Heathrow.

  9573. CHAIRMAN: Would it not still be worthwhile trying to get back at half-past two?

  9574. MR ELVIN: I was just trying to give your Lordships some comfort that the issues this afternoon are not going to, hopefully, be too long.

  9575. CHAIRMAN: It is a comfort, thank you. We will adjourn until half-past two.

The Committee adjourned from 1.12 pm until 2.30 pm

  9576. CHAIRMAN: Welcome back. Mr Elvin, you were going to say something about British Airports Authority.

Heathrow Western Link

  9577. MR ELVIN: I have got a statement to read out, BAA.[41] I have an undertaking in respect of BAA's petition which I have been asked to read into the record and I think your Lordships have a copy. This relates to the outstanding concern I mentioned to you yesterday about works on the Piccadilly Line for the Heathrow Express. I say this: "The Secretary of State for Transport undertakes to use all reasonable endeavours to ensure that, save in respect of any emergency works required for the continued safe operation of either London Underground Limited's network or Network Rail Infrastructure Limited's network, there are no concurrent planned closures:

  (a) of all the railway lines between Paddington Station and the eastern end of the Heathrow spur attributable to the exercise of the powers of the Crossrail Bill to construct the authorised works and,
  (b) of the Piccadilly Line between Hammersmith and Heathrow during the hours when either Heathrow Connect services or Heathrow Express services and Piccadilly Line services are ordinarily scheduled to operate. The Secretary of State also undertakes to use all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the nominated undertaker for the relevant Crossrail works, Network Rail Infrastructure Limited and London Underground Limited, consult and co-operate with each other in the process of the planning of works that may give rise to the aforementioned concurrent planned closures". That is the resolution of the last issue with BAA.

  9578. CHAIRMAN: That will go on the Register?

  9579. MR ELVIN: That will go on the Register. That is a formal undertaking.



40   Committee Ref: A54, Undertakings sought by Network Rail (SCN-20080430-001) Back

41   Crossrail Ref: P68, Crossrail works and Piccadilly line undertaking (SCN-20080430-042) Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008