Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 11560 - 11579)

  11560. CHAIRMAN: We are not meant to make these amendments, are we? We are?

  11561. MR MOULD: That is the usual process.

  11562. CHAIRMAN: We are?

  11563. MR MOULD: Yes. Perhaps, whilst you are reading that, could I explain there is already a process, essentially a similar process, under Clauses 10 and 13 of the Bill in relation to ordinary planning controls because, as your Lordships will appreciate, the effects of Clause 10 is to grant planning permission for the Crossrail scheme. Clause 13 provides a similar power to the Secretary of State by order to provide for the switching back on of ordinary planning consent following completion of the Crossrail works so that any works of maintenance or alteration which thereafter require a grant of planning permission, that permission would need to be sought from the local planning authority in the usual way. Effectively we have spotted an omission. The same approach should apply in relation to the listed building and other conservation area consents. The purpose of this Clause is to make good that omission and ensure the same process applies the across the board.

  11564. CHAIRMAN: I have not been through all the scheduled works in Schedule 6 where there are changes.

  11565. MR MOULD: Shall I explain. That is the second category of minor amendments that are before you. I have just explained the first. The one I have just explained is effectively the changes to Clause 16. If I can turn to the other matters which are those that arise under Schedule 1, Schedule 3 and Schedule 5. What you have there is effectively a limited number of amendments to correct minor errors in those schedules. At the conclusion of the Select Committee proceedings in the other place the Bill was re-printed to incorporate the several hundred detailed amendments comprised in four additional provisions and two papers of amendments which have been agreed to join the course of the Bill passage through that Select Committee process. Since then the Promoter picked up a few further corrections and those are the corrections which are listed in the paper of amendments which are before you, but I can assure the Committee that none of the amendments alters any of the scheduled works or gives the Promoter power to acquire or use any additional land. To give an example, the first two amendments to Schedule 1 set out on the sheets in front of you are consequential on the deletion of a work, work 1/2 which was made in the first House, that is to say the deletion of that work was carried out in the first House. As the description of the termination point of works 1/3a and b made reference to work number 1.2, a deleted work, clearly the description needed to be adjusted to make good that error. The other amendments include the deletion of lines 25 to 30 on page 93 of the Bill and that is to remove three streets in Newham from the list of streets which may be temporarily stocked up as work 2/8 in the original Bill. The reason why that is important is because that work was deleted in AP3 and several land parcels are deleted as they no longer exist on the revised plans following amendments made as part of the additional provisions.

  11566. CHAIRMAN: This is the Schedule 3 one?

  11567. MR MOULD: These are Schedule 1, Schedule 3 and Schedule 5 changes, yes. They are very much minor consequential amendments to reflect a change.

  11568. CHAIRMAN: I am sure they are, but in Schedule 3 page 79, 20 and 9(30) why are you leaving out the London Borough of Tower Hamlets when it is not there in the first place and is in the second place?

  11569. MR MOULD: I think in relation to that, line 20, column 1.

  11570. CHAIRMAN: You are putting it in there?

  11571. MR MOULD: Yes, and in the other reference we are leaving it out.

  11572. CHAIRMAN: So as from line 20 onwards down to when you come to Greenwich it is all in Tower Hamlets and you do not need to say Tower Hamlets again in 30.

  11573. MR MOULD: That is right, that is the convention. You will see in the line in question, line 20, you will remember Fulbourne Street is in the immediate vicinity of Whitechapel Station. It is the location for the new station.

  11574. CHAIRMAN: Let me ask you one more thing about the Schedule 5 amendment which is on page 98, line 4. I am afraid I do not see 258.

  11575. MR MOULD: Column 2. Bear with me a moment. No, I think I will have to own up to that and say we are not quite sure. I think there must an incorrect reference there so what I will do—

  11576. CHAIRMAN: There must be, so it is no use asking us to make a whole lot of amendments if there is some doubt about their correctness.

  11577. MR MOULD: You are be absolutely right and, I suspect, there is a typographical error there and what I will do is ask—

  11578. CHAIRMAN: Would you like to go back over this list again and just check everything once more?

  11579. MR MOULD: By all means.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008