Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 12940 - 12959)

  12940. MR GOODMAN: My Lord, I can only take what has been said earlier by Ms Lieven that offers have not been taken up but certainly I would encourage any opportunity to discuss those with Crossrail.

  12941. CHAIRMAN: I am sure you would and it would be very sensible of you to, but has it happened?

  12942. MR GOODMAN: It has not happened. There have been no meetings, to my knowledge, between my clients and Crossrail.

  12943. CHAIRMAN: So they have never been through the interminable list of things you have very properly put into your Petition? They have never been discussed with the Promoters?

  12944. MR GOODMAN: May I say `not yet' would be my answer.

  12945. CHAIRMAN: This is the last day of this Committee's sitting and if we are going to do anything about it, it is a bit late to say not yet because there is a lot of detail there, is this not?

  12946. MR GOODMAN: There is, my Lord.

  12947. CHAIRMAN: And the Scottish case is only an example of the sort of thing that you want?

  12948. MR GOODMAN: Yes.

  12949. CHAIRMAN: But there are lots and lots more.

  12950. MR GOODMAN: My Lord, I understand the difficulty faced by your Lordship. Looking at the Petition there is a wide range of matters raised and the difficulty that I have had in advising my clients is that the expertise, as I flagged up earlier, upon which those kind of demands can be made is simply not available to them, and that is why I made the second suggestion I did, that if this kind of procedure in the future in the course of construction is to be very valuable to both parties, then my clients are going to have to have proper assistance.

  12951. MS LIEVEN: My Lords, if I can just say, having now seen this document for the first time and Mr Berryman having seen it, it is plain that the substance of it is what we are doing, it is just we are doing it through a complex suite of documents which is appropriate for a project the size of Crossrail. The precedent that has been put in front of you is for a surface level railway that has very little to do with the issues that arise with Crossrail, and Mr Berryman will go into the witness box in a minute and explain that the safeguards that Network Rail are giving on the Airdrie railway are, in substance, the same, or possibly a little less comprehensive, than what we are doing. It is just an example that if the Petitioners had only talked to us and given this material to us in advance, clearly, we could have sorted out these issues but, as far as this one is concerned, which is the one specific precedent they have produced, I can deal with it in evidence, I am happy to say.

  12952. BARONESS FOOKES: Mr Goodman, the Lord Chairman requested the Promoters to provide a list of all the arrangements that were being made through the various papers on noise and construction and so forth plus any particular undertakings and they have now been circulated.

  12953. MR GOODMAN: I have not had a chance to go through them.

  12954. BARONESS FOOKES: I appreciate that is probably not possible but my guess is that most of the concerns that have been expressed by your clients are actually addressed within this list of undertakings and general arrangements and that probably the real concern of your clients is whether they will actually be carried out in practice. That, as I understand it, is the worry of your clients, particularly as they appear to have no confidence in the local authority whom one would expect to be the first line of defence, as it were, for the interests of your clients. Would that be fair?

  12955. MR GOODMAN: That is certainly the way I have been trying to put the case to you this morning. The position is obviously that now it is very late in the process, it is going to be difficult for us, and has been very difficult, without any technical experts, for us to come up with any undertakings that are technically accurate or justifiable, and so my suggestion has been that the concerns be met by the provision of some form of technical assistance so that as the matters go along this feeling of anxiety that the bargains that have been struck will not be kept, that the local authority will not stick up for them—and, incidentally, the group of local authorities referred to by your Lordship earlier today does not include Tower Hamlets.

  12956. CHAIRMAN: It has done one of the generic exercises.

  12957. MR GOODMAN: I understand it is not included within all the agreements.

  12958. CHAIRMAN: It has not been doing noise ones but it has done one of them. I think it has done the local employment one.

  12959. MR GOODMAN: My Lady, that is certainty the thrust of my argument today that I hope the Committee will take on board.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008