Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 12960 - 12979)

  12960. BARONESS FOOKES: It would be of value to your clients, I think, to go through this paper more thoroughly than one can do in a committee like this so they can see precisely in one formula what has been arranged and then to concentrate, I would suggest, on making sure that these rules are enforced in practice on the ground.

  12961. MR GOODMAN: Yes and indeed it would be sensible to take up the offer of a meeting with Crossrail to have that explained, if that is still open.

  12962. CHAIRMAN: I think it would have been very much better, truthfully, if your clients had gone to talk to Crossrail a long time ago, even if they did not have the expertise, because these things are not particularly difficult to understand, they really are not.

  12963. LORD BROOKE OF ALVERTHORPE: Is there a formal forum, a liaison group like has been suggested for Spitalfields?

  12964. MS LIEVEN: There will be, my Lord, yes. As I think we explained, the Spitalfields and Paddington ones were set up early—in Spitalfields because of local concerns and in Paddington because of the particular complexity of the issues in the scheme's evolution. The intention is that there will be similar liaison groups all the way up and down the route so there will be one in Mayfair. I do not know whether it will cover the whole of Mayfair and down to Tottenham Court Road but the area will be covered in the liaison group.

  12965. CHAIRMAN: Mr Goodman, I do not think all is lost. Here is the list of not only the undertakings but the environmental minimum requirements which are going to be imposed by contract on the nominated undertaker and you have got a whole list of protective provisions here which ought to be helpful to your clients.

  12966. MR GOODMAN: Yes, my Lord, some of them are helpful.

  12967. CHAIRMAN: The difficulty is that your clients will not discuss them with Crossrail.

  12968. MR GOODMAN: I am told that some of them are helpful and some of them do not go far enough as far as my clients are concerned.

  12969. CHAIRMAN: But you cannot tell us which ones?

  12970. MR GOODMAN: I can go through some of them in detail if it is helpful.

  12971. CHAIRMAN: I will tell you what we will do, if you want to pick out individual undertakings and minimum requirements which you say are inadequate, why do I not invite the Promoters to call Mr Berryman and you can put these points to him and say what it is that is wrong with the undertakings?

  12972. MR GOODMAN: I would be content to do that. I would need a small opportunity of taking instructions on that.

  12973. CHAIRMAN: Have you not taken instructions on all these things?

  12974. MR GOODMAN: I have only received this list this morning.

  12975. CHAIRMAN: But it has been available for ages.

  12976. MR GOODMAN: I have explained to your Lordship that I have not had the opportunity of reading every document and covering every angle that arises out of this case. It is simply not within the bounds of feasibility. I am doing this generously for the opportunity for myself but I am not doing it in a comprehensive fashion as though my clients were capable of instructing me to that degree of specificity and I do not have the back-up of any expertise by which I can assess the reasonableness of this.

  12977. CHAIRMAN: I do understand and I am sure they are very grateful to you for taking this case on in the way that you have, and so are we, but there is no way forward unless you can point to the deficiencies that you claim exist.

  12978. MR GOODMAN: If that is the only way that the Committee does see a way to go forward —- I have tried to present an alternative way forward that I thought would ameliorate anxieties and difficulties of this nature in future, because unless the suggestion I have put forward, or something of that nature, is adopted over the next five years when those problems arise my clients will simply be in the same position of not having any expertise by which they can assess properly the kind of undertakings or methodologies that are being employed, so that is the alternative that I proposed, and I propose that for very pragmatic reasons that I do not have the expertise personally by which I can go through and know which ones of these are in accordance with industry best practice or not; that is not something I know about.

  12979. CHAIRMAN: You cannot do it; I can quite see that.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008