Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 13120 - 13139)

  13120. MR ELVIN: If there are any other matters arising from that or the Committee require further clarification, no doubt the Committee will let me know.

  13121. MS KHELA: Do I get a right of response to any of these issues? I have a report here which does not mention anything about Whitechapel Station. It mentions the 50-storey tower. Residents in Spitalfields have spent several years arguing on the Heron Tower and today we have heard something entirely different, that it is something to do with the station, yet the Mott MacDonald report in 2002—

  13122. CHAIRMAN: Are you at the moment representing the Association?

  13123. MS KHELA: Well, I am the agent, so I imagine I am.

  13124. CHAIRMAN: No, I do not think you are. You have got counsel.

  13125. MS KHELA: No, I do not have counsel actually.

  13126. MR GOODMAN: I am not instructed for the WHRA.

  13127. CHAIRMAN: Are you not?

  13128. MR GOODMAN: No.

  13129. MS KHELA: There is a report here which I have provided which quite clearly says, "Development east of Liverpool Street Station and Bishopsgate, a 50-storey building, constrains the alignment. Three alignments were considered in the Crossrail Report: alignments A and B with a station at Whitechapel and alignment C, without a station, running to the south of Whitechapel approximately along Commercial Road. Of these alignments, B and C can no longer be considered due to the development east of Liverpool Street Station, Aldgate, a 50-storey development. Should the development proposal change, then these alignments may become viable options once again". If the Committee does want to hear evidence on the piled buildings, which is the recent argument presented, they were the Spitalfields Petitioners who mentioned this and I will refer the Committee also to what Matthew Horton said—

  13130. CHAIRMAN: Please will you stop. There is no point in your going on with this. We have heard what Mr Elvin said—

  13131. MS KHELA: And Matthew Horton says at 3880—

  13132. CHAIRMAN: Please will you stop.

  13133. MS KHELA:—that there is a planning application which has been withdrawn which has now been shown as existing.

  13134. CHAIRMAN: If you will not stop, I will adjourn the Committee.

  13135. MS KHELA: I am not being heard?

  13136. CHAIRMAN: No, because I am telling you that it does not make any difference. We cannot do anything about it.

  13137. MS KHELA: We have not been consulted on option B and we were not allowed to comment. I think that is appalling, that we were not allowed to comment, so we were totally reliant on the third reading because we were denied the opportunity to be heard.

  13138. CHAIRMAN: This Committee is now adjourned for five minutes.

The Committee suspended from 2.42pm to 2.45pm

  13139. CHAIRMAN: Now, Mr Goodman, we have the evidence of Mr Berryman. Do I understand that you are not representing Woodseer and Hanbury Residents' Association?



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008