Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 13480 - 13499)

  13480. LORD SNAPE: I had better defer to my colleague.

  13481. LORD BROOKE OF ALVERTHORPE: I am satisfied.

  13482. LORD SNAPE: We are satisfied.

  13483. MR ELVIN: Very well.

  13484. CHAIRMAN: The other loose end that I have is this question of the infrastructure manager.

  13485. MR ELVIN: My Lords, can I deal with this issue. Your Lordships will have seen from the paper, in which I have had some hand, the difficulty is this. Infrastructure manager, as you will have seen, has a different definition in both the ROGs and the Access Regulations. The infrastructure manager in reality for the Access Regulations is whoever has the appropriate degree of control. In both cases, it is a matter for negotiation between the interested parties, which is why this issue arose with Network Rail. There were negotiations with Network Rail, TfL, of course ourselves as Promoter and the ORR is going to be involved, as we told the Committee it would.

  13486. The infrastructure manager has not been finalised for either sets of regulations. It is not in dispute that Network Rail should be infrastructure manager under the ROGs, as I said during the course of the submissions by Mr Purchas.

  13487. CHAIRMAN: For the tunnel?

  13488. MR ELVIN: We are dealing only with the central tunnel. Network Rail is the infrastructure manager for the national network before you get to the central section.

  13489. So far as the access regulations are concerned, there is not as yet consensus, hence the issue with Network Rail. That will have to be agreed, because ultimately, if it is the Secretary of State who exercises the compulsory purchase powers under what will become the Crossrail Act, and there is a possibility that those powers can be delegated under the Act, if it is the Secretary of State, then of course, control will vest in whoever the Secretary of State gives control to under whatever agreement is reached, but we are seeking, as we said during Network Rail's Petition, to agree between the various interested parties. So, my Lords, the infrastructure manager has not yet been finally appointed but it is a matter for further negotiation and discussion, as we explained during the Network Rail Petition.

  13490. CHAIRMAN: Let me try and get this clear, because we were asked by Network Rail to recommend that they and not TfL should be the infrastructure manager for the central tunnel.

  13491. MR ELVIN: That is correct.

  13492. CHAIRMAN: But that would be two different infrastructure managers for the central tunnel according to which regulations you look at.

  13493. MR ELVIN: That is absolutely right.

  13494. CHAIRMAN: As I understand you are saying for the moment, for the purposes of the 2006 regulations, which is the ROGs, it will be Network Rail.

  13495. MR ELVIN: There is no dispute that it should be Network Rail. Network Rail I think are rather reluctant to take on that role unless they have the other role as well.

  13496. CHAIRMAN: However, Transport for London would like to have the other role?

  13497. MR ELVIN: That is what I understand.

  13498. CHAIRMAN: Then they are going to contract out track maintenance work.

  13499. MR ELVIN: Transport for London wish to have the central tunnel deregulated. They wish to have control of it and they wish to deal with the management of the infrastructure via contract, which may be to Network Rail but Network Rail do not want that type of arrangement.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008