Select Committee on European Union Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witness (Questions 118-119)

Mr Bertie Armstrong

19 MARCH 2008

  Q118  Chairman: Welcome. Thank you for finding the time both to prepare your written evidence and to come and see us today. We are very grateful.

  Mr Armstrong: Thank you very much, my Lord Chairman. I am pleased to be here.

  Q119  Chairman: We proceed on these things, if you wish—and it will be often quite helpful—to have a general statement from yourself and then we go through a question and answer session—and I hope you have an indication of the subjects that we are likely to cover. Would you like to say something in general?

  Mr Armstrong: Yes, please. Although it is not necessarily wholly apposite to the questions you have asked, it is worth me making our position clear on the CFP in general, because it always becomes part of the debate. I have stated in my written evidence that if the CFP did not exist, a similar framework, an international framework, in order to properly manage a mobile resource accessed from several different places and in several different places, would have to exist. That can be interpreted as support for the CFP per se. That is not the case. I would not like to be seen as an apologist for the CFP. I would like to be seen as a reforming zealot for the CFP. That is not the same as, "Armstrong agrees with the CFP in its present form". That sets the scene.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008