Select Committee on European Union Written Evidence


Memorandum by The Scottish Government

LEVEL OF EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS

1.   The proposed level of emissions reductions and the automatic change from 20% to 30% should an international agreement be reached

  The Scottish Government supports the Commissions proposal for the level of the EU ETS central cap, and the proposal for its automatic adjustment once a comprehensive international climate agreement has been reached.

SCOPE AND OPERATION

2.   The sectors and gases that the Commission proposes to include and exclude. We would be particularly interested in views on the inclusion of Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) sectors, including agriculture

  The Scottish Government agrees with the Commission's proposals for the inclusion of CO2 emissions from petrochemicals, but not with the inclusion of aluminium smelting, due to the risk of carbon leakage in this sector.

  The Scottish Government is collaborating with the UK Government to explore the potential for including emissions from LULUCF into the ETS. The Scottish Government supports the UK position that difficulties with monitoring, reporting and verification of emissions from this sector mean it is not suitable for inclusion at this stage.

3.   The practical application and enforceability of the scheme

  In our partnership with the UK Government in implementing the scheme, the Scottish Government has not encountered any problems with application or enforceability that were not to be expected in a major, ground-breaking scheme such as the ETS.

4.   The key strengths and weaknesses of the proposal. You may wish to consider in particular:

    the extent to which the scheme as currently designed will encourage technological innovation;

    whether it will result in the appropriate price signal being sent;

    whether it will be efficient and/or equitable.

  The Scottish Government believe the Commission's proposals are generally strong and in the right direction. In particular, a set trajectory for reductions in the central cap, together with increasing levels of auctioning, will result in a robust price signal being sent. Proposals for opt-out of small emitters are also welcome.

5.   The potential application of the new Article 24a permitting allowances to be issued in respect of projects outside the scope of the Community scheme that reduce greenhouse gas emissions

  The Scottish Government is collaborating with the UK Government to examine the issues raised by this proposal. One of the matters we'll want to examine from the proposal is the need for limits on credits.

ALLOCATION AND AUCTIONING

6.   Whether decisions about the proportion of permits to be allocated for free rather than auctioned should be taken at the EU level or at the Member State level, and what the time-frame for such decisions should be

  The Scottish Government considers that the proportion of allowances to be distributed free of charge should be set using a central methodology. But auction levels should be determined on the basis of a minimum level. This would provide flexibility to allow Member States to auction more should national circumstances call for it. The Scottish Government considers the date for determining EU rules on free allocation should be brought forward to Dec 2009 to provide earlier certainty.

7.   Which sectors (if any) should continue to receive a proportion of their emissions permits allocated free of charge, and for how long

  The Scottish Government supports the Commission's intention that from 2013, with the exception of electricity generators and Carbon Capture and Storage infrastructure, and except where there is deemed to be a risk of carbon leakage, all installations will receive 80% of their share of the EU cap free of charge. The Scottish Government also agrees that this should decrease by an equal amount each year to arrive at 0% free allocation in 2020. The Scottish Government agrees with the Commission's view that an evidence-based approach to decisions on the risk of carbon leakage is required, and is involved in the UK Government's discussions with industry on this issue.

8.   Whether the redistributive element of the Commission's proposal (whereby poorer Member States are allocated more auctionable emissions permits, thereby increasing the revenues accruing to their Treasuries) is appropriate

  The Scottish Government recognises this is partly a reserved issue, but it would have impacts for implementation of the scheme, which is a devolved matter. The Scottish Government strongly supports the UK Government's view that environmental legislation is not the appropriate framework for the redistribution of resources between Member States.

THE INTERNATIONAL DIMENSION

9.   The extent to which EU operators should be allowed to meet obligations under the ETS by investing in projects to reduce emissions outside the EU through the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)

  The Scottish Government considers there should be a limit on the use of credits from outside the EU, but is currently involved in discussions with the UK Government on the Commission's proposals for the use of, and limits on, project credits.

10.   The likely feasibility of creating links between the ETS and other similar schemes around the world

  The Commission's proposals increase the feasibility of creating links between the ETS and other similar schemes around the world. The Scottish Government welcomes the flexibility in this regard as this is key to encouraging mandatory cap-and-trade systems around the world.

18 June 2008



 
previous page contents next page

House of Lords home page Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008